A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO THE START-UP BUSINESS ECOSYSTEM: A CROSS-COMPARISON OF KOREA, CHINA, AND JAPAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore in detail the business ecosystems for high-tech start-ups in Korea, China, and Japan using a dynamic approach. For this purpose, this study proposes the start-up life cycle (SLC) framework, which includes the stages of technology optimisation (R&D), fundraising, and exit, which is based on overcoming obstacles at each developmental stage, such as the Valley of Death and Darwinian Sea, the two major startup business barriers. Thus, this study enables accounting for the macroscopic dynamic flow and quantitative comparison of the business ecosystem. Each country shows very different start-up business ecosystem characteristics: Korea has a supply-centric ecosystem, whereas Japan and China have a technology-centric and a market-centric ecosystem, respectively. The analysis performed in this study enables us to recognise the significant differences between the technology start-up ecosystems in the three countries. Furthermore, the SLC framework suggested in this study not only allows for an analysis of the critical path of the entrepreneur and the capital in the start-up business ecosystem but also permits an understanding of the characteristics of the start-up business ecosystem of each country through radial graphs. This study dynamically contributes to the understanding of the entire start-up business ecosystem in each country and enables an understanding of the direction of future start-up policies by comparing the three different ecosystems.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Auerswald, P.E., & Branscomb, L.M. (2003). Valleys of Death and Darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024980525678
Azorín, J.M., & Cameron, R. (2010). The application of mixed methods in organisational research: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 95–105.
Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (2000). Flexible recycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. In K. Martin (Ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region (pp. 166–189). San Francisco, CA: Stanford University Press.
Beer, S. (1964). Cybernetics and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
Bruton, G.D., & Rubanik, Y. (2002). Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00079-9
Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed methods research: The five Ps framework. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 96–108.
Campbell, A., Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & van Basten Batenburg, R. (2003). The future of corporate venturing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 30–38.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D.J. (2012). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.
Chang, V., & Uden, L. (2008, February). Governance for e-learning ecosystem. Paper presented at the Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST 2008), Phitsanulok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2008.4635164
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.001.0001
Creswell, J.W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In T. Cijek (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Currall, S., & Towler, A. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: Toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 513–526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
Gobble, M.M. (2014). Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 55.
Hammerstedt, R.H., & Blach, E.L. (2008). Commercialization of basic research from within the university and return of value to the public. Animal Reproduction Science, 105(1), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.014
Han, J. (2003). Venture business and business strategy. Seoul, Korea: Hongmoon Publishers, Inc.
Han, J., Lee, C., & Kim, Y. (2007). An exploratory study on new venture policies for research institute based entrepreneur in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 29(3), 99–117.
Herrmann, B.L., Marmer, M., Dogrultan, E., & Holtschke, D. (2012). Startup ecosystem report 2012. Telefónica digital partnered with Startup Genome. Retrieved 5 July 2016 from http://multisiteblog.digital.telefonica.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/Startup-Eco_14012013.pdf
Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, L., & Nummela, N. (2006). Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
IMF (International Monetary Fund). (2016). Regional economic outlook: Asia and Pacific. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship (Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project).
Babson Park, MA: Babson College. Keil, T., McGrath, R.G., & Tukiainen, T. (2009). Gems from the ashes: Capability creation and transformation in internal corporate venturing. Organization Science, 20(3), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0373
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations: London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209915
Kim, J. (2014). Platform business and network strategy. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 57–74.
Kim, J. (2016). The platform business model and business ecosystem: Quality management and revenue structures. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2113–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1251882
Lee, M. (2012). Homo mobilians. Seoul, Korea: Bookconcert Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.699830
Lee, M., & Lee, J. (2010). Super organic enterprise. Seoul, Korea: Gimm-Young Publishers, Inc.
Li, Y.-R. (2009). The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation, 29(5), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.007
Manigart, S., & Struyf, C. (1997). Financing high technology startups in Belgium: An explorative study. Small Business Economics, 9(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007967722346
Mathews, J.A. (1997). A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. California Management Review, 39, 26–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165909
McGrath, R.G. (2010). Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005
Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
Moore, J.F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business.
Murphy, L.M., & Edwards, P.L. (2003). Bridging the valley of death: Transitioning from public to private sector financing. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R.A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00519.x
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of “significant” findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Seoul, Korea: Random House LLC.
Rossman, G.B., & Wilson, B.L. (1985). Numbers and words combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900505
Rossman, G.B., & Wilson, B.L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic.” Quality and Quantity, 28(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098947
Rothschild, M. (2004). Bionomics: Economy as business ecosystem. New York, NY: Beard Books.
Schwab, K., Porter, M.E., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2007). The global competitiveness report 2007–2008. Chineham, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.
Smith, R., Pedace, R., & Sathe, V. (2011). VC fund financial performance: The relative importance of IPO and M&A exits and exercise of abandonment options. Financial Management, 40(4), 1029–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01170.x
Spilling, O.R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2
Srinivasan, K. (2009). Management of technology: From invention to innovation. ELICINA Electronics Outlook, 12(5), 27–28.
Townsend, A.K. (2009). Business ecology: Why most green business practices don’t work… and what to do about it. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing Limited.
Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosma, N. (2005). Success and risk factors in the prestartup phase. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-6994-6
Zacharakis, A.L., Shepherd, D.A., & Coombs, J.E. (2003). The development of venturecapital-backed internet companies: An ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00084-8
Zahra, S.A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007
Zahra, S.A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons, 55(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004
Zhang, J., & Liang, X.-J. (2011). Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: The case of China Mobile. Telecommunication Policy, 35, 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.009