The Impact of Promoter on Firm Value: Evidence from Emerging Economies

Main Article Content

Aghila Sasidharan
Rahul Sukumaran
Sobhith Jose

Abstract

Using panel regression on a sample of 1,532 firms listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India and 450 firms in the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) of China, this study examines the impact of promoter ownership on firm value. We find that promoter have positive impact on firm value in China while it is inversely related to India due to the entrenchment effect or opportunistic behaviour of the promoter. We provide evidence that the opportunistic behaviour of the promoter can be reduced only through monitoring by the corporate governance mechanisms such as board of directors. We contribute to the existing literature on corporate governance and corporate finance by examining the link between promoter ownership and firm value. Our results help the regulators and policy makers to formulate a regulation that reduces the opportunistic behaviour of promoters.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aghila Sasidharan, Rahul Sukumaran, & Sobhith Jose. (2024). The Impact of Promoter on Firm Value: Evidence from Emerging Economies. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2024.29.2.4
Section
Original Articles

References

Altaf, N., & Ahmad, F. (2019). Working capital financing, firm performance and financial constraints: Empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(4), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-02-2018-0036

Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567

Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1991). Negotiated block trades and corporate control. The Journal of Finance, 46(3), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03769.x

Bebchuk, L. A., & Roe, M. J. (1999). A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance. Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 127–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229459

Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan.

Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Roudaki, J. (2018). Related party transactions and firm valuation: Evidence from the New Zealand context. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 26(1), 65–83.

Chee, T., Ryan, A. M., Wasif, A., Robbins, C. W., & Finnerty, J. (2017). The impact of accountable care organizations on the integration of care for vulnerable populations. Health Services Research, 52(1), 89–108.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511

Demsetz, H. (1985). Commentary on liability rules and the derivative suit in corporate law. Cornell Law Review, 71, 352–356.

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354

Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7

Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–669.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1985). Organizational forms and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90045-5

Fehre, K., & Weber, F. (2019). Why some are more equal: Family firm heterogeneity and the effect on management’s attention to CSR. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12225

Ghalke, A., Haldar, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Family firm ownership and its impact on performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00527-7

Goel, A., Dhiman, R., Rana, S., & Srivastava, V. (2022). Board composition and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-09-2021-0483

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Karpoff, J. M., Malatesta, P. H., & Walkling, R. A. (1996). Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(96)00883-5

Kearney, A. T. (2004). FDI Confidence Index, Global Business Policy Council. The Global Business Policy Council. https://www.kearney.com/documents/291362523/291366906/FDICI-2004.pdf/ace36650-6b81-9596-75f2-d667fcf7fd0c?t=1500027456000

Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042

La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Majumdar, A. (2020). Convergence in corporate governance: The case of China and India. BRICS Law Journal, 7(1), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-1-59-90

Manna, A., Sahu, T. N., & Pandey, K. D. (2020). Board size, multiple directorship and performance of Indian listed firms. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 19(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2020.104754

Michiels, A., Botero, I. C., & Kidwell, R. E. (2022). Toward a family science perspective on executive compensation in family firms: A review and research agenda. Family Business Review, 35(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211064410

Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mishra, R., & Kapil, S. (2017). Effect of ownership structure and board structure on firm value: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance, 17(4), 700–726. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0059

Mishra, A. K., Jain, S., & Manogna, R. L. (2021). Does corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in India? Empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(1), 71–82.

Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7

Pandey, K. D., & Sahu, T. N. (2019). Concentrated promoters’ ownership and firm value: Re-examining the monitoring and expropriation hypothesis. Paradigm, 23(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890719844422

Pandey, K. D., & Sahu, T. N. (2021). Ownership concentration and agency crises in Indian manufacturing firms. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/227853372091084

Rana, A. A. (2021). Role of corporate finance law in corporations. International Journal of Research, 8, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3861737

Reeb, D. M., & Zhao, W. (2013). Director capital and corporate disclosure quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.11.003

Ryngaert, M. D., & Thomas, S. (2007). Related party transactions: Their origins and wealth effects. SSRN, 970689. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.970689

Salerka, E. (2005). Ownership concentration and firm value: A study from the Indian corporate sector. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(6), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2005.11052627

Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 94(1 Part 3), 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2443.00010

Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2012). Corporate governance in India. SAGE Publications India.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Value maximization and the acquisition process. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.1.7

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Srinivasan, P. (2013). An analysis of related-party transactions in India. Working Paper No. 402. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.

Thenmozhi, M., Saravanan, P., & Sasidharan, A. (2019). Impact of excess cash on earnings management and firm value: Evidence from China. Corporate Ownership and Control, 17(1), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i1siart7