How Do the Political Connections and the Corporate Governance Mechanisms Affect the Firm Risk of Chinese Dual-listed Companies?

Main Article Content

Wing Kwong Chan
Ei Yet Chu

Abstract

This research aims to assess the influences of political connections and corporate governance (CG) mechanisms on the firm risk of Chinese dual-listed companies (CDLC). CDLCs are Chinese companies that have core businesses in China and simultaneously list their shares in the Hong Kong and the China A-share markets. One hundred CDLCs are chosen for this research from 2003 to 2019. A binary variable of state control firm attribute (SCFA) is created to proxy the political connections to the Chinese government. The standard deviation of daily stock return and the mean of the natural logarithm of squared daily stock return are the two proxies of firm risk. The regression results show that the SCFA negatively influences the firm risk. Thus, the political connections, proxied by the SCFA, mitigate the firm risk. However, the state ownership’s influence on firm risk is insignificant. The regression results are supportive of our argument that SCFA and state ownership are two distinct concepts. Both the board size and independent director ratio insignificantly influence the firm risk. The CEO duality cannot be concluded to positively influences the firm risk and is not a destabilising factor in CDLCs. Evidence of the legal bonding effect is not observed in this research.

Article Details

How to Cite
How Do the Political Connections and the Corporate Governance Mechanisms Affect the Firm Risk of Chinese Dual-listed Companies?. (2024). Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 20(2), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2024.20.2.8
Section
Articles

References

Al-ahdal, W. M., Alsamhi, M. H., Tabash, M. I., & Farhan, N. H. S. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Indian and GCC listed firms: An empirical investigation. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101083

Ali, Z., & Tauni, M. Z. (2021). CEO overconfidence and future firm risk in China: The moderating role of institutional investors. Chinese Management Studies, 15(5), 1057–1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2019-0147

Aloui, M., & Jarboui, A. (2018). The effects of corporate governance on the stock return volatility: During the financial crisis. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(2), 478-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2017-0010

Al-zaidyeen, K. A. A., & Al-rawash, S. Z. (2015). The effect of ownership structure on corporate performance of listed companies in Amman Stock Exchange: An empirical evidence of Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(5), 41–49.

Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. L. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1411–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01115.x

Boateng, A., Cai, H., Borgia, D., Bi, X. G., & Ngwu, F. N. (2017). The influence of internal corporate governance mechanisms on capital structure decisions of Chinese listed firms. Review of Accounting and Finance, 16(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-12-2015-0193

Cao, L., Du, Y., & Hansen, J. Ø. (2017). Foreign institutional investors and dividend policy: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 26(5), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.001

Chakraborty, A., Gao, L., & Sheikh, S. (2019). Corporate governance and risk in cross-listed and Canadian only companies. Management Decision, 57(10), 2740–2757. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-1052

Chang, E. C., & Wong, S. M. L. (2004). Political control and performance in China’s listed firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.001

Chaudhary, P. (2021). Impact of board structure, board activities and institutional investors on the firm risk: evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 47(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2020-0281

Che, L. (2018). Investor types and stock return volatility. Journal of Empirical Finance, 47(September 2016), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.03.005

Chen, Z., Du, J., Li, D., & Ouyang, R. (2013). Does foreign institutional ownership increase return volatility? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.10.006

Chiang, Y. C., & Chan, M.-H. (2017). Foreign ownership and firm-level stock return volatility in Taiwan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-1).2017.10

Claessens, J. S., & Fan, P. H. (2002). Corporate governance in Asia. International Review of Finance, 3(2), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461723

Coffee Jr., J. C. (2002). Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listing and stock market competition on international corporate governance. Columbia Law Review, 1757. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/31

Daraghma, Z. M. A. (2016). The impact of foreign ownership on the stock returns and accounting performance of the listed corporations in the Palestine exchange. Information (Japan), 19(1), 121–137.

Dodd, O. (2013). Why do firms cross-list their shares on foreign exchanges? A review of cross-listing theories and empirical evidence. Review of Behavioral Finance, 5(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-05-2013-0020

Doku, J. N., Abdul-Razak Borowa, H., Mohammed, I., & Attah-Botchwey, E. (2023). Impact of corporate board size and board independence on stock returns volatility in Ghana. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2), 2204597. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2204597

Estwick, S. A. (2016). The impact of principal-principal conflict on financial flexibility: A case of Caribbean firms. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(4), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-12-2015-0043

Fang, H., Lee, J. S., Chung, C. P., Lee, Y. H., & Wang, W. H. (2020). Effect of CEO power and board strength on bank performance in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 69, 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101215

Ferris, S. P., Kim, K. A., & Noronha, G. (2009). The effect of cross-listing on corporate governance: A review of the international evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00743.x

Garanina, T., & Kaikova, E. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and agency costs: cross-country analysis. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 16(2), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2015-0043

Ghadhab, I. (2019). Does cross-listing in the US mitigate stock crash risk? International evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 63(October 2018), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.04.007

Ghosh, C., Giambona, E., Harding, J. P., & Sirmans, C. F. (2011). How entrenchment, incentives and governance influence REIT capital structure. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-010-9243-6

Gul, S., Sajid, M., Razzaq, N., & Afzal, F. (2012). Agency cost, corporate governance and ownership structure (the case of Pakistan). International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(9), 268–277. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42418/

Hatane, S. E., Supangat, S., Tarigan, J., & Jie, F. (2019). Does internal corporate governance mechanism control firm risk? Evidence from Indonesia’s three high-risk sectors. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(6), 1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0071

Hatem, B. S. (2015). What determines cumulative abnormal returns? An empirical validation in the French market. International Business Research, 8(12), 89. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n12p89

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html

Karolyi, G. A. (2006). The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: Challenging conventional wisdom. Review of Finance, 10(1), 99–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10679-006-6980-8

Korczak, A., & Korczak, P. (2013). The development of emerging stock markets and the demand for cross-listing. Journal of Empirical Finance, 24, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.08.002

Liljeblom, E., Maury, B., & Hörhammer, A. (2020). Complex state ownership, competition, and firm performance: Russian evidence. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(2), 189–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2017-0287

Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2019.12.001

Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 159–184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126768

L. X., Jiang, F., & Sathye, M. (2017). Does bonding really bond? Liability of foreignness and cross-listing of Chinese firms on international stock exchanges. Research in International Business and Finance, 41(April), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.033

Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004

Ma, J., & He, X. (2018). The Chinese Communist Party’s integration policy towards private business and its effectiveness: An analysis of the Ninth National Survey of Chinese Private Enterprises. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 4(3), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218782636

Mathew, S., Ibrahim, S., & Archbold, S. (2016). Boards attributes that increase firm risk: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 16(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2015-0122

McMillan, D. G., & Evans, P. (2015). Stock returns and volatility dynamics in China: Does the control of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) matter? China Finance Review International, 5(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2014-0041

Merz, A., & Trabert, S. (2020). Board size, firm type, and stock return volatility. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3549906

Mezhoud, M., Sghaier, A., & Boubaker, A. (2017). The impact of internal governance mechanisms on the share price volatility of listed companies in Paris Stock Exchange. Bulletin of Applied Economics, 4(1), 1–12.

Moyer, R. C., Rao, R., & Baliga, B. R. (1996). CEO duality, firm performance and corporate governance: What’s the fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199601)17

Naufa, M. A., Lantara, I. W. N., & Lau, W. Y. (2019). The impact of foreign ownership on return volatility, volume, and stock risks: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.09.002

Pham, D. H., & Pham, Q. V. (2020). The impact of ceo duality on firm performance: Examining the life-cycle theory in Vietnam. Accounting, 6(5), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.010

Queiri, A., Madbouly, A., Reyad, S., & Dwaikat, N. (2021). Corporate governance, ownership structure and firms’ financial performance: Insights from Muscat securities market (MSM30). Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), 640–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2020-0130

Sabbaghi, O. (2016). Corporate governance in China: A review. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 16(5), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2015-0162

Sayari, N., & Marcum, B. (2018). Reducing risk in the emerging markets: Does enhancing corporate governance work? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.01.002

Sethi, P., Sahu, T. N., & Maity, S. (2022). Firm performance, vertical agency crisis and corporate governance of Indian listed companies. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 7(1). 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-01-2022-0003

Vo, X. V. (2015). Foreign ownership and stock return volatility: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 30, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2015.03.004

Wang, Q. (Sophie), Anderson, H. D., & Chi, J. (2017). The impact of VC backing on the corporate governance of Chinese IPOs. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3), 330–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-02-2017-0015

Wu, X., & Li, H. (2015). Board independence and the quality of board monitoring: Evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 11(3), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-07-2014-0101

Xie, F., Anderson, H. D., Chi, J., & Liao, J. (2019). Does residual state ownership increase stock return volatility? Evidence from China’s secondary privatization. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.012

Xie, F., Anderson, H. D., Chi, J., & Liao, J. (2023). State control and stock price crash risk: New evidence of the conservatism of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 19(4), 853–889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-08-2021-0373

You, L., Payne, J. D., & Lin, S. W. J. (2018). Do multiple foreign listings create value for firms? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.12.006

Yu, M. (2013). State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2013.03.003

Zhang, C., Cheong, K. C., & Rasiah, R. (2018). Board independence, state ownership and stock return volatility during Chinese state enterprise reform. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(2), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2016-0172