The Influence Of Embedding Different Loadings Of MWCNTs On The Structure And Permeation Of CAB Blended Membrane

Main Article Content

Anas Khalid Abdelsalam Abdelgadir
Zeinab Abbas Jawad
Peng Chee Tan
Siaw Khur Wee

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been widely known to be the main contributor
to global warming and temperature fluctuations. The CO2 gas is primarily found in the combustion of fossil fuels and natural gases. Several approaches were considered in the industry to minimise CO2 emissions such as ammonia scrubbing and membrane technology.
In recent years, membrane technology has exhibited excellent CO2 separation performance especially the mixed matrix membrane (MMM) due to its combined properties of organic and inorganic materials. The small footprint and high efficiency of the membrane technology compared with the traditional gas separation processes has  given it a distinct
advantage. In this work, the MMMs are synthesised from the cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) polymer and the functionalised multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) through Chen’s soft-cutting method. This study aims to synthesise an excellent MMM with high separation performance by studying the effects of incorporating different amounts of MWCNTs fillers into the CAB blended membrane. The fabricated MMM was developed
using 4 wt% of CAB with molecular weights of 12000, 65000 and 70000 mixed in a ratio of 1:1:1. The functionalised MWCNTs were incorporated into the CAB matrix with different filler loadings ranging from 0.0125 wt% to 0.2 wt%. The separation performance of the fabricated MMM was successfully conducted towards CO2/N2 separation. The highest CO2 and N2 gas permeance were exhibited from the MMM-0.025 with average values of 36.0 ± 0.4 GPU and 28.0 ± 0.2 GPU, respectively. Further, the highest CO2/N2 selectivity

Article Details

How to Cite
Anas Khalid Abdelsalam Abdelgadir, Zeinab Abbas Jawad, Peng Chee Tan, and Siaw Khur Wee. 2026. “The Influence Of Embedding Different Loadings Of MWCNTs On The Structure And Permeation Of CAB Blended Membrane”. Kajian Malaysia 31 (1): 15-36. https://doi.org/10.21315/.
Section
Articles

References

Brunetti, A. et al. (2010). Membrane technologies for CO2 separation. J. Membr.

Sci., 359(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.040

Zhao, L. et al. (2008). A parametric study of CO2/N2 gas separation membrane

processes for post-combustion capture. J. Membr. Sci., 325(1), 284–294.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.058

Baker, R. (2001). Future directions of membrane gas-separation technology.

Membr. Technol., 138, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-2118(01)80332-3

Lee, R. J. et al. (2016). Improvement of CO2/N2 separation performance by polymer

matrix cellulose acetate butyrate. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 206, 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/206/1/012072

Shen, Y. & Lua, A. C. (2012). Preparation and characterization of mixed matrix

membranes based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) and zeolite 4A for gas separation.

Polym. Eng. Sci., 52(10), 2106–2113. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23165

Hamm, J. B. S. et al. (2017). Recent advances in the development of supported

carbon membranes for gas separation. Int. J. Hydr. Energy, 42(39), 24830–24845.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.071

Nejad, M. N. & Asghari, M. (2016). Investigation of carbon nanotubes in mixed

matrix membranes for gas separation: A review. Chem. Bio. Eng. Rev., 3(6),

–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600012

Dechnik, J. et al. (2017). Mixed-matrix membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 56(32),

–9310. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201701109

Murali, R. S. et al. (2010). Gas permeation behavior of Pebax-1657 nanocomposite

membrane incorporated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,

(14), 6530–6538. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie9016495

Ye, F., Zhang, J. M. & Zhang, J. (2015). Gas separation properties of cellulose

acetate butyrate/MWCNTs mixed matrix membranes. Acta Polym. Sin., 12, 1396–

https://doi.org/10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2015.15095

Mina, U. et al. (2017). Effect of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on

maize genotypes health index. Ecol. Ind., 105, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.060

Chen, J., Dyer, M. J. & Yu, M. F. (2001). Cyclodextrin-mediated soft cutting

of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123(25), 6201–6202.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja015766t

Ahmad, A. L. et al. (2014). A cellulose acetate/multi-walled carbon nanotube

mixed matrix membrane for CO2/N2 separation. J. Membr. Sci., 451, 55–66.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.043

Jiang, L. Y., Chung, T. S. & Kulprathipanja, S. (2006). An investigation to revitalize

the separation performance of hollow fibers with a thin mixed matrix composite

skin for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci., 276(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.041

Aroon, M. A. et al. (2010). Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes

for gas separation: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol., 75(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.08.023

Liu, K. et al. (2008). Assembly of β-cyclodextrins acting as molecular bricks onto

multiwall carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112(4), 951–957. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp0756754

Ismail, A. F. et al. (2011). Gas separation performance of polyethersulfone/multi-

walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol., 80(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.031

George, S. C. & Thomas, S. (2001). Transport phenomena through polymeric

systems. Prog. Polym. Sci., 26(6), 985–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00036-8

Wijmans, J. G. & Baker, R. W. (1995). The solution-diffusion model: A review.

J. Membr. Sci., 107(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I

Yu, B., Cong, H. & Zhao, X. (2012). Hybrid brominated sulfonated poly(2,6-

diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and SiO2 nanocomposite membranes for CO2/

N2 separation. Prog. Nat. Sci., 22(6), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.11.004

Husain, S. & Koros, W. J. (2007). Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes made with

modified HSSZ-13 zeolite in polyetherimide polymer matrix for gas separation.

J. Membr. Sci., 288(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.016

Sahoo, N. G. et al. (2010). Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized

carbon nanotubes. Prog. Polym. Sci., 35(7), 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.03.002

Sanip, S. M. et al. (2011). Gas separation properties of functionalized carbon

nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol., 78(2), 208–213.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.003

Lee, R. J. et al. (2018). Incorporation of functionalized multi-walled carbon

nanotubes (MWCNTs) into cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) polymeric matrix to

improve the CO2/N2 separation. Process. Saf. Environ., 117, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.021

Puleo, A. C., Paul, D. R. & Kelley, S. S. (1989). The effect of degree of acetylation

on gas sorption and transport behavior in cellulose acetate. J. Membr. Sci., 47(3),

–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83083-5

Mustafa, A. et al. (2010). The effect of functionalization carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

on the performance of PES-CNTs mixed matrix membrane. Int. J. Sci. Eng., 1(1),15–20.

Lavorgna, M. et al. (2013). Silanization and silica enrichment of multiwalled

carbon nanotubes: Synergistic effects on the thermal-mechanical properties of

epoxy nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J., 49(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.003

Lou, Y. et al. (2014). A facile way to prepare ceramic-supported graphene oxide

composite membrane via silane-graft modification. Appl. Surf. Sci., 307, 631–637.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.088

Farahani, M. H. D. A., Hua, D. & Chung, T. S. (2018). Cross-linked mixed

matrix membranes (MMMs) consisting of amine-functionalized multi-walled

carbon nanotubes and P84 polyimide for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)

with enhanced flux. J. Membr. Sci., 548, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.037

Aghaei, Z. et al. (2018). The influence of fumed silica content and particle size in

poly (amide 6-b-ethylene oxide) mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Sep.

Purif. Technol., 199, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.035

Moghadassi, A. R. et al. (2014). Fabrication and modification of cellulose

acetate based mixed matrix membrane: Gas separation and physical properties.

J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(3), 1050–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.042

Rao, P. S. et al. (2008). A comparison of carbon/nanotube molecular sieve

membranes with polymer blend carbon molecular sieve membranes for the gas

permeation application. Microp. Mesop. Mat., 113(1), 499–510. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.008

Tseng, H. H. et al. (2009). Preparation and characterization of carbon molecular

sieve membranes for gas separation—The effect of incorporated multi-wall carbon

nanotubes. Desalin., 240(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.048

Sun, H. et al. (2017). Fabrication of polyimide and functionalized multi-walled

carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes by in-situ polymerization for

CO2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol., 177, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.015

Cong, H. et al. (2007). Carbon nanotube composite membranes of brominated

poly(2,6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci., 294(1),

–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.035