Heritage Conservation: Authenticity and Vulnerability of Living Heritage Sites in Melaka State
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Melaka Historical City, together with George Town, Penang, were conferred the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site (WHS) in 2008. One of the requirements in order to remain in the listing is a high degree of local community participation in its continued conservation. This is in order that the local communities who are regarded as stakeholders and custodians of the sites would actively participate in their protection. Similarly, living heritage sites in Melaka seek to recreate historical settings to simulate past time periods, thus providing visitors a glimpse of what it would be like to live in the past. Such sites call for the participation and involvements of the ethnic-specific group to shape and preserve its cultural heritage and identity. Living heritage sites can also be regarded as a way for the community to seek relevance especially in a multi-cultural society. However, authenticity is among the major concerns of the living heritage sites as well as other factors that they encountered in the face of modernisation and development that subsequently contribute to their vulnerabilities. The focus of this article is the living heritage sites in Melaka. The discussion is based on the study of the three living heritage sites in Melaka. The living heritage sites are Kampung Morten, Kampung Chetti and Kampung Portugis. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with various key individuals of the three communities as well as focus group discussions with members of the community. The study shows that although there are concerns that need to be addressed the informants believe that through the living heritage sites the community members are able to express their cultural identity, pride and knowledge to their younger members as well as share them with the society in general.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Andaya, B. W. and L. Y. Andaya. 1991. A history of Malaysia. MacMillan: London. Asmaliana. 2013. Melaka in a glance. 27 March. http://asmaliana.com/blog/2013/03/27/melaka-in-a-glance/comment-page-1/ (accessed 20 November 2017).
Bernama. 2016. 15.7 million visitors to Melaka in 2015. 6 January. http://tourism-melaka.blogspot.my/2016/01/157-million-visitors-to-melaka-in-2015.html (accessed 20 November 2017).
Byrne, D. 2014. Counter heritage: Critical perspectives on heritage conservation in Asia. New York: Routledge.
Corsane, G., ed. 2005. Heritage, museums and galleries: An introductory reader. Routledge: New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203326350.
Cutter, S. L., B. J. Boruff and W. L. Shirley. 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84: 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002.
Freyfogle, E. T. 2006. Why conservation is failing and how it can regain ground. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300110401.001.0001.
Galla, A. 1993. Heritage curricula and cultural diversity. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Graham, B. and P. Howard. 2008. The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Ashgate: England.
Handler, R. and E. Gable. 1997. The new history in an old museum: Creating the past at Colonial Williamsburg. USA: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1988.3.3.02a00020.
Handler, R. and W. Saxton. 1988. Dyssimulation: Reflexivity, narrative and the quest for authenticity in "living history". Cultural Anthropology 3(3): 242–260. http://doi.10.1525/can.1988.3.3.02a00020.
Howard, P. 2003. Heritage: Management, interpretation, identity. London: Continuum. Huber, M. W., ed. 2011. Museums and memory. Newfound Press: Tennessee.
International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM). 2015. People-centerd approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage: Living heritage. Guidance Note. Rome: ICCROM.
International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). 1964. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Second International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice. http://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed 23 June 2017).
ICOMOS Australia. 1999. Burra Charter (fourth version): The Australia ICOMOS charter for the conservation of places of cultural significance. http://www.icomos.org/australia/burra/html (accessed 23 June 2017).
ICOM Asia Pacific. 2002. Shanghai charter. http://archives.icom.museum/shanghai_charter.html (accessed 23 June 2017).
Jones, S. 1996. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In Culture, identity and archeology: The construction of European communities, eds. P. GravesBrown, S. Jones and C. Gamble. New York: Routledge.
Kwanda, T. 2010. Tradition of conservation: Redefining authenticity in Javanese architectural conservation. In Heritage 2010 – Portugal: International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development, Evora, Portugal. 22–26 June.
Labadi, S., ed. 2007. World heritage: Challenges for the millennium. Paris: UNESCO.
Miura, K. 2008. The need for anthropological approaches to conservation and management of living heritage sites: A case study of Angkor, Cambodia. In Interpreting Southeast Asia's past: Monuments, image and texts, eds. E. A. Q. Bacus, I. C. Clover and P. D. Sharrock. Singapore: NUS Press.
Nizamuddin Alias. n.d. Melaka as a World Heritage Site: A study from the legal point of view (Melaka sebagai Tapak Warisan Dunia: Kajian dari pandangan perundangan). Jurnal Perspektif. 3(1): 60–77. http://www.myjurnal.my/filebank/published_article/30508/5.PDF (accessed 23 June 2017).
Nordin Hussin. 2007. Trade and society in the Straits of Melaka: Dutch Melaka and English Penang, 1780–1830. Singapore: National University of Singapore (NUS) Press.
Pillai, P. 2015. Yearning to belong. Malaysia's Indian Muslims, Chitties, Portuguese Eurasians, Peranakan Chinese and Baweanese. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).
Poliaus, I. 2014. The past in the present: A living heritage approach – Meteora, Greece. London: Ubiquity Press.
Rahimah Abdul Aziz, Halimaton Saadiah Hashim, Ong Puay Liu, Geraldine Chan Kim Ling, Sarah Aziz, Ruslin Amir and Sharina Abdul Halim. 2015. Laporan penglibatan pihak berkepentingan dalam governans pemuliharaan warisan: Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah. Laporan akhir penyelidikan. Bangi: The Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), UKM.
Singh, S. R., Mohammad Reza Eghdami and S. Singh. 2014. The concept of social vulnerability: A review from disasters perspectives. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies (IJIMS) 1(6): 71–82. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f6bd/4afdfab5f57d0fbc1d62675b03cf3abdc5e7.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).
Siti Norlizaiha Harun and Izzamir Ismail. 2011. The conservation plan for World Heritage Site: George Town, Penang and Malacca, Malaysia. The 1st International conference on rebuilding place: From culture to art and architecture, University Kuala Syiah, Banda Acheh, Indonesia. 4 October. https://www.academia.edu/6035394/THE_CONSERVATION_PLAN_FOR_WORLD_HERITAGE_SITE_GEORGE_TOWN_PENANG_AND_MALACCA_MALAYSIA
Sr Brit Anak Kayan. 2015. University-community engagement programme: A case study of traditional Melakan house inspection in Malacca Historical City, Malaysia. The Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement 10(1): 1–40.
Starproperty.my. 2013. Malacca's most famous Malay village, Kampung Morten, is named after a british-era collector of land revenue. 11 October. http://www.starproperty.my/index.php/articles/property-news/malaccas-most-famous-malayvillage-kampung-morten-is-named-after-a-british-era-collector-of-land-revenue/ (accessed 12 December 2016).
Stovel, H. 2004. Authenticity in conservation decision-making: The world heritage perspective. Journal of Research in Architecture and Planning, Conservation and Cultural Heritage Volume 3: 1–8.
______1998. Risk preparedness: A management manual for World Cultural Heritage. Rome: ICCROM. http://www.iccrom.org/ifrcdn/pdf/ICCROM_17_RiskPreparedness_en.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2004. Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. A global report. New York: UNDP-Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BRCP).
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2010. Community-based approach to museum development in Asia and the Pacific for culture and sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
______1972. UNESCO Convention concerning the protection of world cultural and natural heritage. http://whc/unesco.org/en.conventiontext/ (accessed 20 December 2016).
Varutti, M. 2010. The politics of imagining and forgetting in Chinese ethnic minority museums. Outlines – Critical Practice Studies 12(2): 69–82.
World Heritage Centre (WHC). 2008. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. Paris: UNESCO, World Heritage Centre. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
______. 2005. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Wijesuriya, G. 2005. The past is in the present: Perspectives in caring for Buddhist heritage sites in Sri Lanka. In Conservation of living religious heritage: Papers from the ICCROM 2003 Forum on living religious heritage, conserving the sacred, eds. H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Priceand R. Killick. Rome, Italy: International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).
Xie, P. F. 2004. Visitors' perception of authenticity at a rural heritage festival: A case study. Event Management 8: 151–160. https://doi.org/10.3727/1525995031436908.