Governance Networks for Effective Custodians' Participation in the Sustainability of Langkawi as a Geopark

Main Article Content

Geraldine K. L. Chan

Abstract

The Global Geopark Networks (GGN) created the concept of "geopark" as a geographically designated area that contains geological, ecological, historical cultural resources for community sustainable development primarily through tourism activities. The Langkawi archipelago has always been rich in such resources and heritage, and was conferred the geopark status by GGN in 2007. Since then, the government and some private, non-governmental organisations have been involved in many geopark projects and activities. Some of them are members of the top down governance system while other parties work independently of one another. For Langkawi to sustain in the long run as a successful and economically developed geopark without the depletion of its geological, ecological, cultural and historical resources, its governance system can be further improved. Effective custodian participation is best achieved through proper governance network system whereby the networks are established between at least two or more organisational and non-organisational custodians irrespective of their social status, ethnicity, gender, wealth and income levels. Specifically, the custodians should work closely together and establish networks in a transparent, accountable, responsible, fair, trustworthy and consistent manner. Effective participation should be in terms of shared norms of behaviour such as cooperation, assistance and influence. Furthermore, such effective participation is based on shared views, shared values, shared norms and other shared aspects guided to some extend by basic network principles such as reciprocity and mutuality. This implies that similarity or commonality is a key feature in social networks formation of the custodians. Trust is also present as a network element. For Langkawi to sustain as a geopark in present and future times, effective participation from all custodians can be achieved through governance networks or social networks. This paper will present some findings from two empirical studies conducted on effective governance networks for the success of Langkawi as a geopark.

Article Details

How to Cite
Geraldine K. L. Chan. 2017. “Governance Networks for Effective Custodians’ Participation in the Sustainability of Langkawi As a Geopark”. Kajian Malaysia 35 (Supp. 1): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.Supp.1.6.
Section
Articles

References

Burt, R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caspersen, O. H. 2009. Public participation in strengthening cultural heritage: The role of landscape character assessment in Denmark. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography 109(1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2009.10649594

Carson, D. and J. Macbeth, eds. 2005. Regional tourism cases: Innovation in regional tourism. Australia: Common Ground Publishing. http://sustain.pata.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/FINAL_REGIONAL-Tourism-Cases.pdf (accessed 24 August 2012).

Chan Kim Ling @ Geraldine. 2015. Social networks as social capital for eco-tourism in Langkawi Geopark: A preliminary sociological study. Geografia Online (Malaysian Journal of Society and Space) 11(13): 156–164.

______. 2009. Social capital and social networks in the Malaysian corporate elite world: A conceptual framework. Jurnal E-Bangi 4(1): 30–45.

______. 2008. Jaringan elit korporat dan cabaran sosio-budaya di Malaysia: Senario pada awal dan pertengahan 1990an. In Transformasi masyarakat Malaysia: Cabaran famili, gender dan sosiobudaya, ed. Rahimah Abdul Aziz, 180–216. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

______. 2007. Mengkonseptualisasi modal sosial dan pengorganisasian elit korporat Malaysia: Satu kes untuk memahami Indonesia? In Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam era globalisasi dan lokalisasi: Mewujudkan kemakmuran bersama, Vol 1, eds. Armida S. Alisjahbana, Ramdan Panigoro, Parikesit, Abd Hair Awang, Chan Kim Ling @ Geraldine, Junaenah Sulehan, Nik Hairi Omar, Shaiful Bahri Md. Radzi, Ruzy Suliza Hashim and Zarina Othman. Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran.

______. 2005. Social organisation of the business elite and big business growth: Malaysia during the 1990s economic boom. Akademika 65(1): 69–90.

______. 2004. Business-politics relations in Malaysia: A sociological analysis of interlocking directorships. Ph.D. diss., London School of Economics and Political Science.

Chan, K. L. Geraldine, S. Selvadurai, Rahimah Abdul Aziz and Afiqah Norizan. 2016. Building a social network model for effective stakeholders' participation and cooperation in heritage conservation and sustainable development in Langkawi, Geopark. Research report. FRGS/1/2013/SS03/UKM/02/4.

Chan, K. L. Geraldine, Abdul Hadi Harmans Shah, S. Selvadurai, Rahimah Abdul Aziz and Afiqah Norizan. 2015. Social networks and sustainability in Langkawi Geopark. In Civilization, hopes and discontent: Insights from the social sciences and humanities, 65–85. Bangi: Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan.

Chan, K. L. Geraldine, Halimaton Saadiah Hashim and Sarah Aziz. 2011. Introducing network planning: An example from Langkawi. Planning Malaysia (Journal of the Malaysia Institute of Planning) 1(Special issue): 159–184.

Chan, K. L. Geraldine, Sarah Aziz, Halimaton Saadiah Hashim and Rahimah Abdul Aziz. 2010. Sistem jaringan governans untuk Langkawi Geopark: Pengkisahan konseptual. Akademika 80: 69–84.

Chan, G. and Mohamad Zaki Ibrahim. 2008. Conceptualising network society in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science 36(5): 773–791. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853108X364226.

Christakis, N. A. and J. H. Fowler. 2009. Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Cooper, C., N. Scott, R. March, I. Wilkinson, C. Pforr and G. Thompson. 2006. The network structure of tourism operators in three regions of Australia. Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd. http://sustain.pata.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Cooper_NetwrkTourismOps.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017).

Dale, A., C. Ling and L. Newman. 2010. Community vitality: The role of community-level resilience adaption and innovation in sustainable development. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/1/215 (accessed 17 September 2013).

Drexhage, J. and D. Murphy. 2010. Sustainable development: From Bruntland to Rio 2012. Background paper: Prepared for the consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting, 19 September. http://www.surdurulebilirkalkinma.gov.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/Background_on_Sustainable_Development.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).

Few, R. n.d. Containment and counter-containment: Planner/community relations in conservation planning. The Geographical Journal 167(2): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4959.00011.

Field, J. 2003. Social capital. London: Routledge. Global Geoparks Network. n.d. What is a UNESCO global geopark? http://www.globalgeopark.org/aboutGGN/6398.htm (accessed 17 November 2017).

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.

______1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.

Hampton, M. P. 2004. Heritage, local communities and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research 32(3): 735–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.010

Hanberger, A. 2011. Evaluation of local sustainable development – approaches and use. In Evaluation for participation and sustainability in planning, eds. A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee and J. Woltjer. Oxon: OX: Routledge.

Kapferer, B. 1972. Strategy and transaction in an African factory: African workers and Indian management in a Zambian town. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Khan, S. 2009. Sustainable development and community participation: A case study of Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. http://www.iese.ac.mz/lib/publication/II_ conf/CP31_2009_Khan.pdf (accessed 17 September 2013).

Kolleck, N., G. de Haan and R. Fischbach. 2011. Social networks for path creation: Education for sustainable development matters. Journal of Futures Studies 15(4): 77–92. http://www.jfs.tku.edu.tw/15-4/A06.pdf (accessed 1 November 2012).

Leeuwis, C. 2000. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change 31: 931–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00184.

Lourenço, N., C. R. Machado, M. do Rosário Jorge and L. Rodrigues. n.d. Sustainability: Importance of social networks in the decision-making processes. Working paper.

Monno, V. and A. Khakee. 2011. More of the same or just right and robust? Evaluating participatory planning. In Evaluation for participation and sustainability in planning, eds. A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee and J. Woltjer. Oxon: OX: Routledge.

Morris, J. n.d. Removing the barriers to community participation. A report by The National Community Forum, UK. National Marine Sanctuaries. n. d. Custodian participation Module 5. http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/management/pdfs/Day5-CUSTODIANS-MANUAL.2.pdf (accessed 24 August 2012).

Oels, A. 2003. Evaluating stakeholder participation in the transition to sustainable development: Methodology, case studies, policy implications. NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Pradhananga, N. and C. Landorf. 2008. Stakeholder participation at World Heritage Sites: An analysis of the past and present conservation systems of the Kathmandu Valley World Heritage Site. http://www.guthiaustralia.org/files/Full%20Paper%20Heritage%202008.pdf (accessed 17 September 2013).

Pumar, E. S. 2005. Social networks and the institutionalization of the idea of sustainable development. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 25(½): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330510791298

Scott, J. 1991. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: SAGE Publications.

Scott, J. and G. Marshall. 2005. Oxford dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sharma, S. and I. Henriques. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal 26: 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.439.

United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UNWCED). 1987. Our common future. Switzerland: WCED. http://www.un-documents.net/ourcommon-future.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1997. Governance for sustainable human development, A UNDP policy document. http://www.pogar.org/publications/other/undp/governance/undppolicydoc97-e.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).

United Nations Economic and Social Council. 2006. Definitions of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration. Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fifth Session, New York, Agenda Item 5. 27–31 March. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan022332.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).

UNPAGLOSSARY. n.d. UN public administration glossary. http://www.unpan.org/Directories/UNPAGlossary/tabid/928/Default.aspx (accessed 25 April 2017).

Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478.

Williard, T. 2009. Social networking and governance for sustainable development. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/social_net_gov.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).

World Bank. 1991. Managing development: The governance dimension. A discussion paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/884111468134710535/pdf/34899.pdf (accessed 25 April 2017).