Enhancing Federal Government Mandates to Ensure Continuity of Heritage Legacies

Main Article Content

Sarah Aziz
Siti Zuhaili Hasan

Abstract

The responsibility to ensure a legacy is continued, particularly for cultural and natural heritage, often rests with the government agencies, who are armed with the necessary legislative mandates to safeguard and protect them. Heritage in itself has a complex meaning, from the determination of the subject matter itself, the characterisation of its nature and value, to regulating the interactions that may have positive or negative impacts to it. It transcends guarding an object or subject, and involves the complex human-environment relations to the object or subject, encompassing that which is tangible and intangible. In addition, there are times when both cultural and natural heritage become interlinked resulting in it being categorised as mixed heritage, which requires a different set of approaches that complements the need for both cultural and natural heritage conservation. The question to be addressed revolves on what needs to be safeguarded and how can it be properly contextualised, taking into account the complex nature of heritage conservation and the interactions between those who know, those who have "inherited" and have cared for it, with those who are tasked to safeguard it. In addition, there is a need to look at the roles of those who act as custodians, by exploring what entails from the mandate given, towards enabling a collaborative arrangement, in order to ensure that existing mandates become complementary and mutually supportive. This article looks at the intricate relationship focusing on different Federal government mandate holders of cultural and natural heritage conservation, taking into account the federated system of government in place in Malaysia. It briefly discusses a segment of the current Federal government arrangement, and challenges as well the opportunities ahead in Malaysia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sarah Aziz, and Siti Zuhaili Hasan. 2017. “Enhancing Federal Government Mandates to Ensure Continuity of Heritage Legacies”. Kajian Malaysia 35 (Supp. 1): 165–183. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.Supp.1.9.
Section
Articles

References

Aas, C., A. Ladkin and J. Fletcher. 2005. Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of Tourism Research 32(1): 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.005.

Araoz, G. F. 2011. Preserving heritage places under a new paradigm. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1(1): 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129933.

Blake, J. 2000. On defining the cultural heritage. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49(1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129933.

Copyright Act. 1987. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Daily, G. C. and P. R. Ehrlich. 1999. Managing earth's ecosystems: An interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2: 277–280. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3659017.de

Jesus Jopela, A. P. 2011. Traditional custodianship: A useful framework for heritage management in Southern Africa? Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 13(2–3): 103–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355211X13179154165908.

Edson, G. 2004. Heritage: Pride or passion, product or service? International Journal of Heritage Studies 10(4): 333–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1352725042000257366.

Federal Constitution of Malaysia. 1957. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Geological Survey Act. 1974. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Geographical Indications Act. 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Harvey, D. C. 2001. Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 7(4): 319– 338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13581650120105534.

International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). 1987. Charter for the conservation of historic towns and urban areas. http://www.icomos.org/en/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/chartersand-standards/159-charter-for-theconservation-of-historic-towns-and-urban-areas (accessed 10 April 2017).

Jokilehto, J. 2005. Definition of cultural heritage: References to documents in history. ICCROM Working Group Heritage and Society. http://cif.icomos.org/pdf_docs/Documents%20on%20line/Heritage%20definitions.pdf. (accessed 10 April 2017).

Jokilehto, J. 2006. World heritage: Defining the outstanding universal value. City and Time 2(2): 1–10. http://ceci-br.org/novo/revista/docs2006/CT-2006-45.pdf (accessed 10 April 2017).

Local Government Act. 1976. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. Lowenthal, D. 2005. Natural and cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 11(1): 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527250500037088.

May, P. J. 1993. Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12(4): 634–663. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3325344.

Munjeri, D. 2004. Tangible and intangible heritage: From difference to convergence. Museum International 56(1–2): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00453.x.

National Forestry Act. 1984. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. National Heritage Act. 2005. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

National Land Code. 1965. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Oxford English Dictionary. 2017. Online version. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/custodian (accessed 20 April 2017).

Poria, Y., A. Reichel and A. Biran. 2006. Heritage site management: Motivations and expectations. Annals of Tourism Research 33(1): 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.001.

Reyers, B., D. J. Roux, R. M. Cowling, A. E. Ginsburg, J. L. Nel and P. O' Farrell. 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conservation Biology 24(4): 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01497.x.

Rico, T. 2015. Heritage at risk. In Heritage keywords: Rhetoric and redescription in cultural heritage, eds. K. L. Samuels and T. B. Rico, 147–162. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.

Sarah Aziz, Halimaton Saadiah Hashim, Tanot Unjah, Rahimah Abdul Aziz and K. L. Chan Geraldine. 2011. Land use planning statutes for Langkawi Geopark conservation and development. Planning Malaysia: Conservation with development: Showcasing Langkawi Geopark (Special issue): 83–102.

Strange, I. and D. Whitney. 2003. The changing roles and purposes of heritage conservation in the UK. Planning Practice and Research 18(2–3): 219–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269745032000168278.

Tengberg, A., S. Fredholm, E. Eliasson, I. Knez, K. Saltzman and O. Wetterberg. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services: 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006.

Town and Country Planning Act. 1976. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 1994. Expert meeting on the 'Global Strategy' and thematic studies for a representative World Heritage List: WHC-94/CONF.003/ INF 6. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/1994/whc-94-conf003-inf6e.pdf (accessed 10 April 2017).

Uzzell, D. L. 1998. Interpreting our heritage: A theoretical interpretation. In Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation: Problems and prospects, eds. D. L. Uzzell and Ballantyne, 11–25. London: The Stationery Office. http://www.academia.edu/301486/Interpreting_our_heritage_a_theoretical_interpretation. (accessed 13 April 2017).

Vecco, M. 2010. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11: 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006.

Wildlife Conservation Act. 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Winter, T. 2013. Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19(6): 532–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.720997.