Probation Officers and the Experience of Juvenile Offenders in the Juvenile System
Main Article Content
Abstract
Probation officers are among the individuals who come in closest contact with juvenile offenders in Malaysia. They have extensive responsibilities in the juvenile justice, such as interviewing the juvenile offenders about their social system, writing a probation report for the court, and making recommendations based on their observations. This makes them reliable figures for ascertaining what is happening in the juvenile system. Based on this, this article argues that it is pivotal to study the perceptions of the probation officers regarding the juvenile experience to understand the effectiveness of the system. In this mixed method study, 12 probation officers from 6 states in Malaysia were interviewed. The close-ended items required them to rate each component of the questionnaire, which are related to aspects of the preparation of offenders for entry into the system, their participation inside the system, and their outcomes. The participants' ratings indicated higher-than-average satisfaction. However, the qualitative data showed a mixed response, with respondents expressing more scepticism about the system and often focusing on external factors. Additionally, the probation officers discussed the importance of modules for the juvenile offenders' benefit upon release. The responses from the probation officers shed light on how the experiences of the juvenile offenders can be improved through a three-layer plan that includes the process of preparation, detention, and release.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aida, S. A., H. H. Aili, K. S. Manveen, W. I. Salwina, K. P. Subash, C. G. Ng and A. G. Muhsin. 2014. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among juvenile offenders in Malaysian prisons and association with socio-demographic and personal factors. International Journal of Prisoner Health 10: 132?143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-06-2013-0029
Annison, J., T. Eadie and C. Knight. 2008. People first: Probation officer perspectives on probation work. Probation Journal: The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice 55(3): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550508095122
Austin, J. and P. L. Hardyman. 2004. The risks and needs of the returning prisoner population. Review of Policy Research 21: 13?29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00055.x
Bradshaw, W., D. Roseborough and M. S. Umbreit. 2006. The effect of victim offender mediation on juvenile offender recidivism: A meta-analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24: 87?98. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.159
Bradshaw, W. and D. Roseborough. 2005. Restorative justice dialogue: The impact of mediation and conferencing on juvenile recidivism. Federal Probation 69: 15?21.
Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77?101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burnett, R. and F. McNeill. 2005. The place of the officer–offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice 52: 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550505055112
Chung, H. L. and L. Steinberg. 2006. Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders. Developmental Psychology 42: 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.319
Davies, K. and M. J. Gregory. 2010. The price of targets: Audit and evaluation in probation practice. Probation Journal 54: 400?414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550510381327
Dorey, P. 2005. Policy making in Britain: An introduction. Newcastle: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279410
Galbavy, R. J. 2003. Juvenile delinquency: Peer influences, gender differences, and prevention. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 25: 65?78. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v25n02_05
Gillies, R., A. Carroll, K. Swabey, D. Pullen, A. Fluck and J. Yu. 2014. The role of postsecondary education among ex-inmates living crime-free. Proceedings of the 2014 joint Australian Association for research in education and New Zealand Association for research in education conference, Brisbane, Australia. 30 November?4 December.
Harris, R. J. 1980. A changing service: The case for separating 'care' and 'control' in probation practice. British Journal of Social Work 10: 163?184.
Hazel, N. 2008. Cross-national comparison of youth justice. London: Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.
Heslop, J. 1991. Diverting young offenders from the formal justice system. In Preventing juvenile crime conference proceedings, no. 9, eds. J. Vernon and S. McKillop, 81?87. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
House of Commons Justice Committee. 2011. The role of the probation service. London: House of Commons. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmjust/519/519i.pdf.
Jaafar Abdul Wahid. 1978. The treatment of juvenile delinquents and youthful offenders in Malaysia. Japan: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/51521NCJRS.pdf
Lipsey, M. W. and F. T. Cullen. 2007. The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 297?320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
Lipsey, M. W., D. B. Wilson and L. Cothern. 2000. Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. April. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/181201.pdf.
McLaughlin, E. and J. Muncie, eds. 2013. Abolition. The SAGE dictionary of criminology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development and UNICEF Malaysia. 2013. The Malaysian juvenile justice system: A study of mechanisms for handling children in conflict with the law. Putrajaya: Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development.
Moffatt, S., M. White, J. Mackintosh and D. Howel. 2006. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? BMC Health Services Research 6: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-28
Mohd Al Adib Samuri and Nooraziah Mohd Awal. 2009. Hukuman terhadap pesalah kanak-kanak di Malaysia: Pencegahan atau pemulihan? Jurnal Undang-Undang 35?54.
Mowen, T. J. and C. A. Visher. 2015. Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly 32: 337?359. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.771207
Mutter, R., D. Shemmings, P. Dugmore and M. Hyare. 2008. Family group conferences in youth justice. Health and Social Care in the Community 16: 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00770.x
Naser, R. L. and N. G. La Vigne. 2006. Family support in the prisoner reentry process. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 43: 93?106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n01_05
Nasimah Hussin. 2010. The rights of victims of crime under Malaysian law: Legal framework and prospect for reforms. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 5: 35?43. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v05i04/51661
Nellis, M. 2002. Community justice, time and the new national probation service. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 41: 59?86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00225
Paparozzi, M. A. and P. Gendreau. 2005. An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal 85: 445?466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505281529
Rosansky, J. 2010. Reducing recidivism: Stopping the trend of criminal relapse in America. https://www.palmbeachstate.edu/academicservices/Documents/Reducing_Recidivism.pdf
Rosenblatt, J. A., A. Rosenblatt and E. E. Biggs. 2000. Criminal behavior and emotional disorder: Comparing youth served by the mental health and juvenile justice systems. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 27: 227?237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287315
Siegel, L. J. and B. C. Welsh. 2016. Juvenile delinquency: The core. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Smith, P., C. Goggin and P. Gendreau. 2002. The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.
Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM). 2008. Human rights and the administration of juvenile justice. Malaysia: SUHAKAM. http://www.iccwtnispcanarc.org/upload/pdf/7965505086Human%20Rights%20and%20the%20Administration%20of%20Juvenile%20Justice.pdf.
The Child Justice Alliance. n.d. What is the role of probation officers? The Child Justice Alliance. http://www.childjustice.org.za/downloads/FactSheets/What%20is%20the%20role%20of%20probation%20officers-revised.pdf.
Thielbar, K. n.d. Education in juvenile detention centers. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Chicago. http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/centers/childlaw/childed/pdfs/2011studentpapers/thielbar_juvenile_detention.pdf.
Wemmers, J. 2009. Where do they belong? Giving victims a place in the criminal justice process. Criminal Law Forum 20: 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-009-9107-z
Worrall, A. and R. C. Mawby. 2014. Probation worker cultures and relationships with offenders. Probation Journal 61: 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550514548251