The Role of Gender and Status in Communication between Doctors and Patients in Malaysian Context
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the ways in which gender and status of doctors and patients influence the effectiveness of communication in sustainable health development among Malaysians. In order to conduct this research, we look at the interruption patterns in doctor-patient interaction because interruption provides an opportunity for interactants to dominate the conversation which can have negative effects on the treatment and consultation process. The data consists of 480 minutes of recorded conversations between doctors and patients of both genders during 160 consultation visits. We have used both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyse our data. Conversation analysis has also been used to evaluate the linguistic elements in their talk. The findings indicate that the gender of the interactants has effects on the interruption they make. It appears that male interactants in this study, regardless of their status as a doctor or patient, have the tendency to make intrusive interruptions more than female interactants. In addition, the status of the interactants was a determining factor in the interruption process. Doctors, holding a higher status at the time of consultation, made more intrusive interruptions and patients made more cooperative interruptions. However, based on the analysis, male doctors were more cooperative with their male patients than with their female patients which indicate that male doctors practised discrimination unintentionally. On the other hand, female doctors treated patients of both genders in the same manner. Based on our findings, listening skills and communication training for doctors can minimise miscommunication during consultation visits and enhance healthcare quality which ultimately assists to achieve sustainable health development goals.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, C., C.B. Peterson, L. Fletcher, J.E. Mitchell, P. Thuras and S.J. Crow. 2012. Weight loss and gender: An examination of physician attitudes. Obesity Research 9(4): 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.30
Beckman, H.B. and R.M. Frankel. 1984. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine 101(5): 692–696. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692
Belasen, A.R. and A.T. Belasen. 2018. Dual effects of improving doctor-patient communication: Patient satisfaction and hospital ratings. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14327715133074689875&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 (accessed 11 December 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3096056
Bilous, F.R. and R.M. Krauss. 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same-and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication 8(3/4): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X
Blair-Loy, M., L.E. Rogers, D. Glaser, Y.L. Wong, D. Abraham and P.C. Cosman. 2017. Gender in engineering departments: Are there gender differences in interruptions of academic job talks? Social Sciences 6(1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010029
Coates, J. 2004. Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. 3rd ed. London: Pearson Longman.
_____. 2011. Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Language and gender: A reader, eds. J. Coates and P. Pichler, 199–223. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell.
Drew, P. 2014. Conversation analysis in sociolinguistics. In Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide, eds. J. Holmes and K. Hazen, 9230–9246. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Fishman, P. 1980. Conversational insecurity. In Language: Social psychological perspectives, eds. H. Giles, P. Robinson and P.M. Smith, 127–132. Oxford: Pergamon.
_____. 1983. Interaction: The work women do. In Language, gender, and society, eds. B. Thorne, C. Kramarae and N. Henley, 89–101. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Franks, P. and K.D. Bertakis. 2003. Physician gender, patient gender, and primary care. Journal of Women’s Health 12(1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/154099903321154167
Fritzsche, K., C. Abbo, G. Frahm and S.D. Monsalve. 2014. The doctor-patient relationship. In Psychosomatic medicine: An international primer for the primary care setting, eds. K. Fritzche, S.H. McDaniel and M. Wirsching, 25–32. NY: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1022-5_5
Hall, J., J. Irish, D.L. Roter, C. Ehrlich and L. Miller. 1994. Gender in medical encounters: An analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychology 13(5): 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.13.5.384
Heritage, J. and D.W. Maynard. 2006. Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172
Heritage, J. and S. Sefi. 1992. Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, eds. P. Drew and J. Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S.D., D.A. Johnson and T. DiBenedetto. 2011. Participation in electronic discourse in a “feminist” field. In Language and gender: A reader, eds. J. Coates and P. Pichler, 171–182. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell.
Holmes, J. 2008. An Introduction to sociolinguistics. 3rd ed. United Kingdom: Pearson Longman.
James, D. and S. Clarke. 1993. Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. D. Tannen, 231–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, S.H., B. Gandek, S. Greenfield, W. Rogers and J. Ware. 1995. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style: Results from the medical outcomes study. Medical Care 33: 1176–1187. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199512000-00002
Leet-Pellegrini, H.M. 1980. Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In Language social psychological perspectives, eds. H. Giles, P. Robinson and P.M. Smith, 97–104. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Li, H.Z., M. Krysko, N.G. Desroches and G. Deagle. 2004. Reconceptualizing interruptions in physician-patient interviews: Cooperative and intrusive. Communication & Medicine 1(2): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/come.2004.1.2.145
Litosseliti, L. 2014. Gender and language theory and practice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784792
Maltz, D. and R. Borker. 2011. A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In Language and gender: A reader, eds. J. Coates and P. Pichler, 487–502. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell.
Mohajer, L. 2006. Power and solidarity in conversations of Iranian women. PhD diss., Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, Universiti Malaya.
Peräkylä, A. 2002. Agency and authority: Extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(2): 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_5
Peterson, C. 1986. Sex differences in conversational interruptions by preschoolers. Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association 8: 23–28.
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Street Jr, R.L. and T.L. Murphy. 1987. Interpersonal orientation and speech behavior. Communications Monographs 54(1): 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390215
Tannen, D. 1994. Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
_____. 2005. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tates, K., M.L. Antheunis, S. Kanters, T.E. Nieboer and M.B. Gerritse. 2017. The effect of screen-to-screen versus face-to-face consultation on doctor-patient communication: An experimental study with simulated patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(12): e421. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8033
West, C. 2011. When the doctor is a “lady”: Power, status and gender in physician-patient encounters. In Language and gender: A reader, eds. J. Coates and P. Pichler, 193–197. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell.
_____. 1998. “Not just doctors’ orders”: Directive-response sequence in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. In Language and gender: A reader, ed. J. Coates, 328–353. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell.
Willes, K. and K. Allen. 2014. The importance of sexual orientation disclosure to physicians for women who have sex with women. In Health care disparities and the LGBT population, eds. V.L. Harvey and T.H. Housel, 9–26. United Kingdom: Lexington Books.
Zhao, X. and W. Gantz. 2003. Disruptive and cooperative interruptions in primetime television fiction: The role of gender, status, and topic. Journal of Communication 53(2): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02595.x
Zimmerman, D.H. and C. West. 1975. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Language and sex: Difference and dominance, eds. B. Throne and N. Henley, 105–129. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.