Midwives and Herbal Remedies: The Sustainable Ethnoscience
Main Article Content
Abstract
The traditional Malay practices of pre and postnatal care have been fascinating to help understand women’s health and reproductive role. Women within midwives and midwifery contexts made their status recognised back in the ancient practice. The ethnoscience methods about women’s health have been the centre of discussion way back in the Aztec, Mayan and Egyptian civilisations, yet the topic never gets exhausted. The ethnographic research on midwives conducted in Terengganu in the 1980s and other new literature provided a variation to the study of midwives. This article attempts to revisit the observation of midwives on herbal remedies and other healing processes after a gap of more than 30 years. The question remains whether or not this traditional practice, including herbal intake for diet, bath and massage is sustained in this millennium society. Also, this article analyses the factors and reasons for the persistence of such methods. This research utilises participant observation and intensive interviews with midwives from the west coast of Malaysia. A similar pattern of answers provides essential themes on the utilisation of ethnoscience knowledge on women and health, especially the benefits of herbal remedies for fertility, pregnancy, pre, and postnatal care. Furthermore, practice and belief integrate into modern medicine. The expression of such methods manifests in the cultural capital that views the healing process is integral. As a result, this ethnoscience phenomenon reinvents in a new commercial form that fits modern medicine as a way to rejuvenate women after childbirth.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aguilar, L. 2014. Redefining the past: Women in classical Mayan culture. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=uresposters (accessed 15 December 2017).
Aztec Gender Roles in Society. n.d. Female role. https://genderrolesaztec.weebly.com/female-role.html (accessed 15 December 2017).
Azlizan Mat Enh and Suraini Rosli. 2018. Institusi Perbidanan di Selangor, (1900–1955). Akademika 88(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad.2018-8801-02
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
_____. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education, ed. J. Richardson, 241–258. Westport CT: Greenwood. http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/sites/socialcapitalgateway.org/files/data/paper/2016/10/18/rbasicsbourdieu1986-theformsofcapital.pdf (accessed 7 April 2018).
Chan, R.S.K. 2017. Ah Beng subculture and the anti-capital of social exclusion. UKM Ethnic Studies Paper Series No. 54 (August). Selangor: Institute of Ethnic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Coulon, A. 1995. Ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984126
Davis, I. 2009. The new normal. McKinsey Quarterly. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/the_new_normhttp://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/the_new_normalal (accessed 3 October 2017).
De Graaf, N.D., P.M. De Graaf and G. Kraaykap. 2000. Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education 73(2): 92–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673239
DiMaggio, P. 1982. Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of US high school students. American Sociological Review 47(2): 189–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094962
DiMaggio, P. and J. Mohr. 1985. Cultural capital educational attainment and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology 90(6): 1231–1261. https://doi.org/10.1086/228209
Evenden, D. 2000. The midwives of seventeenth-century London. London: Cambridge University Press. Graetz, B. 1988. The reproduction of privilege in Australian education. British Journal of Sociology 39(3): 358–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/590483
Grant, T. and S. Carter. 2004. Women in medicine: A celebration of their work. Canada: Firefly Books.
Inglehart, R. and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jonsson, J.O. 1987. Class origin, cultural origin, and educational attainment: The case of Sweden. European Sociological Review 3(3): 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036451
Jordan, B. 1989. Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Social Science & Medicine 28(9): 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90317-1
Keng, S.L. 2005. Malaysian midwives’ views on postnatal depression. British Journal of Midwifery 13(2): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2005.13.2.17465
Laderman, C. 1983. Wives and midwives: Childbirth and nutrition in rural Malaysia. USA: University of California Press.
_____. 1991. Taming the wind of desire: Psychology, medicine, and aesthetics in Malay shamanistic performance. USA: University of California Press. Mahmood Mamdani. 2012. Define and rule: Natives as political identity. USA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067356
Mark, J.J. 2016. Women in ancient Egypt. https://www.ancient.eu/article/623/women-in-ancient-egypt/ (accessed 15 December 2017).
Martin, K.C. 2015. Readings in social theory and modernization. USA: Boston University College of General Studies, Massachusetts.
Najla Barnawi, S. Richter and Farida Habib. 2013. Midwifery and midwives: A historical analysis. Journal of Research in Nursing and Midwifery 2(8):114–121.
Novella, S. 2013. The science medicine: Herbs are drugs. Skeptical Inquirer 37(2). http://www.csicop.org/si/show/herbs_are_drugs (accessed 18 April 2017)
Okka, B., Y. Durduran and N.D. Kodaz. 2015. Traditional practices of Konya women during pregnancy, birth, postpartum period and newborn care. Turk J Med Sci 46: 501–511. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1504-120
Robinson, R.V. and M.A. Garnier. 1985. Class reproduction among men and women in France: Reproduction theory on its home ground. American Journal of Sociology 91(2): 250–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/228277
Schutt, R.K. 2015. Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. 8th ed. Canada: Sage Publication Inc.
Skye, A.D. 2010. Aboriginal midwifery: A model for change. Journal de la Santé Autouchtone, Janvier 6(1): 28–37.
Stamarski, C.S. and S.S.H. Leanne. 2015. Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Front Psychol 6: 1400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
Stuart, C.C. 2014. Midwifery service and practice in Malaysia. British Journal of Midwifery 4(5). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.1996.4.5.245
Sullivan, A. 2001. Cultural capital and education attainment. Sociology 35(4): 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501008938
Taylor, S.J., and R. Bogdan. 1998. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. 2002. Penn Museum archaeologists uncover 3700 year old “magical” birth brick at mayor’s residence just outside Abydos, Egypt. 2002. https://www.penn.museum/old/information/press-room/press-releases-research/985-penn-museum-archaeologists-uncover-3700-year-old-qmagicalq-birth-brick-at-mayors-residence-just-outside-abydos-egypt (accessed 14 December 2018).
Towler L, and J. Bramall. 1986. Midwives in history and society. London: Croom Helm.
Verniers, C. and J. Vala. 2018. Correction: Justifying gender discrimination in the workplace: The mediating role of motherhood myths. PLOS ONE 13(7): e0201150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201150
Wazir Jahan Karim. 1984. Malay midwives and witches. Social Science and Medicine 18(2): 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(84)90036-4