Soft Power, Confucius Institute and China’s Cultural Diplomacy in Malaysia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The point of departure in this study is to assess the effectiveness of China’s cultural diplomacy in Malaysia by looking at the employment of three main strategies and its limitations. The study utilises the methods of interview and empirical case study by firstly, giving a detailed look into the Kong Zi Institute (Confucius Institute) in Malaysia, and secondly, investigating some rarely-noticed diplomatic undertakings from the provincial or city governments of China. While the Confucius Institute and some image-building efforts represents the aspect of China’s central government’s soft power policy in Malaysia, the Chinese officials from local governments tend to focus on cultural and economic initiatives with the ethnic Chinese social organisations in Malaysia. After examining the Kong Zi Institute and discussing China’s provincial-local governments’ cultural outreach activities, the third aspect that this article examines is the narrative of Chinese Dream propagated by the Chinese officials in Malaysia. The article ends with an assessment of Malaysian perceptions and responses towards the Chinese official initiatives. Overall, the impact of China’s cultural diplomacy, either the Confucius Institute or other initiatives, in raising the positive image of China, may not be said to be either a success or failure. Malaysian’s positive image of China may have been caused by other factors not directly related to China’s cultural diplomacy, but other factors, including the foreign policy of China and the remarkable economic achievement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ainol Madziah Zubairi and Isarji Hj Sarudin. 2009. Motivation to learn a foreign language in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 9(2): 73–87.
Awang Sariyan, ed. 2011. Prof. Wu Zhong Yu: 50 tahun dalam pengembangan Bahasa Melayu di China. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia.
Bong, M.S. 2014. Malaixiya daxue Kong Zi hanyu xueyuan zai Malaixiya huaren shehui beijing xia de fazhan xianzhuang yu zhanwang (The present situation and development prospect of the Kong Zi Institute at University of Malaya under the context of Malaysian Chinese Society).
Master’s diss., Xiamen University. Borneo Post. 2016. Sarawak tandatangani MoU dengan Fujian. 18 July. http://www.theborneopost.com/2016/07/18/sarawak-tandatangani-mou-dengan-fujian/ (accessed 20 August 2016).
Chen, Z. 2014. Kong Zi Institute for the teaching of Chinese language: Director’s message. http://kongzium.edu.my/?page_id=2161 (accessed 1 September 2014).
Confucius Institute Headquarters (Hanban). 2014. Confucius Institutes worldwide celebrate “Confucius Institute Day”. 16 October. Bejing: Confucius Institute Headquarters (Hanban).
______2015. Conficius Institute annual development report 2015. Beijing: Confucius Institute Headquarters (Hanban).
Dai, R. 2013. Kong Zi xueyan yu Zhongguo yuyan wenhua waijiao (Confucius Institute and China’s language and cultural diplomacy). Shanghai: Shanghai Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.
Guo, J. 2013. Zhongguo wenhua fazhan zhanlue yanjiu (Studies of China’s cultural development strategy). Hong Kong: Zhong Hua Shuju.
Hartig, F. 2012. Confucius Institutes and the rise of China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 17(1): 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-011-9178-7
Hsiao, M.H.-H. and A.H. Yang. 2014. Differentiating the politics of dependency: Confucius Institutes in Cambodia and Myanmar. Issues and Studies 50(4): 11–44.
Huang, H. 2014. Zhongguo zhili dazhao xianjingguo, Zhongguo meng 2020 hongyuan xiangtong (China wishes to become a developed state, the connection between China Dream and Vision 2020). 5 May. http://www.nanyang.com/node/621027 (accessed 24 June 2014).
Hughes, C. 2014. Confucius Institutes and the university: Distinguishing the political mission from the cultural. Issues and Studies 50(4): 45–84. https://doi.org/10.11619/africa.2014.84_45
Koning, J. and A. Susanto. 2008. Chinese Indonesians and “the rise of China”: From business opportunities to questions of identity. In China in the world: Contemporary issues and perspectives, eds. E.K.-K. Yeoh and J.H.-L. Loh, 161–184. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya.
Kornphanat, T. 2016. Culture and commerce: China’s soft power in Thailand. International Journal of China Studies 7(2): 151–174
Kuik, C.-C. 2010. Analyzing Malaysia’s changing alignment choices, 1971–89. Jebat 37: 41–74.
Lee, K.H. 2015. Images and the shaping of Malaysia’s China policy: 1957–1974. International Journal of China Studies 6(2): 107–128.
Ngeow, C.-B. 2017. Barisan Nasional and the Chinese Communist Party: A case study in China’s party-based diplomacy. The China Review 17(1): 53–82.
Ngeow, C.-B. and C.-B. Tan. 2018. Cultural ties and states’ interest: Malaysian Chinese and China’s rise. In China’s rise and Chinese overseas, eds. B.P. Wong and C.-B. Tan, 96–116. Oxon, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231952-6
Nguyen, V.C. 2014. Confucius Institutes in the Mekong region: China’s soft power or soft border? Issues and Studies 50(4): 85–118.
Nye, J. 1990. Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.
______2005. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
______2011. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs. Office of Confucius Institute BFSU. 2014. Annual report 2014, Confucius Institute Beijing Foreign Studies University. Beijing: Office of Confucius Institute.
Pan, S.-Y. 2013. Confucius Institute Project: China’s cultural diplomacy and soft power projection. Asian Education and Development Studies 2(1): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/20463161311297608
Paradise, F.J. 2009. China and international harmony: The role of Confucius Institutes in Bolstering Beijing’s soft power. Asian Survey 49(4): 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.4.647
Shalins, M. 2014. Confucius Institutes: Academic malware. The Asia-Pacific Journal 12(46): 4220. Starr, D. 2009. Chinese language education in Europe: The Confucius Institutes. European Journal of Education 44(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.01371.x
Suryadinata, L. 2017. The rise of China and the Chinese overseas. Singapore: ISEAS. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814762656
Thung, J.L. 2014. Confucius Institute at the Al-Azhar University, Indonesia: The unseen power of China. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on “China’s soft footprints in Southeast Asia”, Manila. 4–5 August.
Thuno, M. 2001. Reaching out and incorporating Chinese overseas: The trans-territorial scope of the PRC by the end of the 20th century. The China Quarterly 2001: 910–929. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443901000535
Wibowo, I. 2011. China’s soft power and neoliberal agenda in Southeast Asia. In Soft power: China’s emerging strategy in international politics, ed. Mingjiang Li, 207–224. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Wu, Y. 2013. Kong Zi xueyuan yu Zhongguo wenhua de guoji chuanbo (Confucius Institute and the international diffusion of Chinese culture). Hangzhou: Zhejiang Daxue Chubanshe.
Zhong, C. 2014. Malaixiya Kong Zi xueyuan xuesheng hanyu xuexi dongji diaocha yanjiuyi Malaxiya daxue xuesheng weili (A study of the motivation of learning of the students at the Kong Zi Institute at the University of Malaya). Master’s diss., Beijing Foreign Studies University