(Re)Placing the Terengganu Peranakan Chinese as “Mek Awang”: Making Chinatown and Heritagising the Peranakan Identities in Kuala Terengganu
Main Article Content
Abstract
In 2017, the Terengganu Chinese Peranakan Association (TCPA) withdrew its participation in the 4th Annual Terengganu Peranakan Festival (TPF) organised by the Terengganu Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (TCCCI) because of a dispute over the combined term “Mek Awang”. To TCPA members, Mek Awang is a derogatory term, which the Malays used to refer to someone as being “soft”, effeminate, or a cross-dresser. However, TCCCI has appropriated the term Mek Awang and used it as a brand name to promote the festival, and to highlight the “uniqueness” of the Terengganu Peranakan Chinese community. This case is an example of how local cultural terms or practices have been readapted to suit tourism interests. Tourism is often accused of reinventing culture for capital ventures. Consequently, many academics and social critics have come to regard official national heritage sites and heritage tourism with scepticism and disdain. Combining ethnographic data from our in-depth interviews with the Terengganu Peranakan Chinese and our participant observation during the festival, we argue that the dispute over Mek Awang is not only a simple change in reference, but is also an indication of a deeper contemporary global process that affects ethnic minorities and their identities. We conclude that various attempts to commodify the peranakan experiences and culture in Terengganu as well as the intention to place the peranakan as a marketable heritage in Chinatown can be interpreted as attempts to replace a heterogeneous community with a homogeneous, uniform, genetic and identifiable ethnic category with a Peranakan1 (with capital “P”) identity.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, B.R.O.G. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Ang, I. 2001. On not speaking Chinese: Living between Asia and the west. London: Routledge.
________2011. Unsettling the national: Heritage and diaspora. In Heritage, memory and identity. The cultures and globalization series 4, eds. H. Anheier and Y.R. Isar, 82–94. London: Sage.
________2016. At home in Asia? Sydney’s Chinatown and Australia’s ‘Asian century’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 19(3): 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915573763.
Carstens, S. 2005. Histories, cultures, identities: Studies in Malaysian Chinese worlds. Singapore: NUS Press.
David, A. 2017. Terengganu Peranakan group: Stop using ‘Mek Awang’ term. New Straits Times. 6 July. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/255018/terengganu-peranakan-group-stop-using-mek-awang-term (accessed 2 June 2018).
Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2011. Population distribution and basic demographic characteristics 2010. Putrajaya: Department of Statistics.
Dhoraisingam, S.S. 2006. Peranakan Indians of Singapore and Melaka: Indian Babas and Nyonyas Chitty Melaka. Singapore: ISEAS. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812305992
Eom, S. 2013. The specter of modernity: Open ports and the making of Chinatowns in Japan and South Korea. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 24(2): 39–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41945722.
Eriksen, T.H. 2002. Ethnicity and nationalism. 2nd ed. London: Pluto Press.
Gosling, L.A.P. 1964. Migration and assimilation of rural Chinese in Terengganu. In Malayan and Indonesian studies: Essays presented to Sir Richard Winstedt on his eighty-fifth birthday, eds. J. Bastin and R. Roolvink, 203–221. London: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, J. 2003. Ethnic heritage as a tourist attraction: The peranakans of Singapore. International Journal of Heritage Studies 9(1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352725022000056613.
Jenkin, G. 2010. Interpreters of space, place, and cultural practice: Processes of change through tourism, conservation, and development in George Town, Penang Malaysia. In Heritage tourism in Southeast Asia, eds. M. Hitchcock, V.T. King and M. Parnwell, 147–172. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Liu, C.H. 2012. The Chinese in Kuala Terengganu from the beginning of the 18th century to the 20th century. Inaugural Biennial Conference on Malaysian Chinese Studies, Kuala Lumpur. 9–10 June. (???. ??18-20???????????) http://www.cmcs.my/2012/paper/2.pdf
Loo, H.C. 2009. Contested media narratives: Negotiating nationalism and ethnicity in Malaysia. PhD diss., School of Culture and Communication, Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne.
Loo, H.C. and F. Muller. 2016. Ethnic minorities and multi-ethnic heritage in Melaka: Reconstructing Dutch Eurasian and Chitty Melaka identities through Facebook. In The Asia-Pacific in the age of transnational mobility: The search for community and identity on and through social media, ed. C. Gomes, 143–168. London: Anthem Press.
Loo. Y.M. 2012. ‘No Chinatown, please!’: Contesting race, identity and postcolonial memory in Kuala Lumpur. The Journal of Architecture 17(6): 847–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.746025.
Ng, K.Y. 2018. Tourist arrivals and hotel occupancy in Penang. Penang Monthly. February. http://penangmonthly.com/article.aspx?pageid=10147&name=tourist_arrivals_and_hotel_occupancy_in_penang (accessed 2 June 2018).
Penang Institute. 2018. Quarterly Penang statistics. https://penanginstitute.org/resources/data-centre/97-quarterly-penang-statistics/ (accessed 2 June 2018).
Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, T. and J. Tacchi. 2015. Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE: London.
Pue, G.H. 2016. Peranakan as plural identity: Cases from Peninsular Malaysia. Regional Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 1(1): 67–93.
________2018. Cina Peranakan Kelantan menerusi lensa sosiologi. Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.
Pue, G.H. and A.B. Shamsul. 2012. Peranakan as a social concept. Selangor: Institute of Ethnic Studies.
Pue, G.H., P.L. Ong and H.C. Loo. 2018. The Cheng Mua community of Kuala Terengganu. In Waterfront heirlooms: Reflections of the Kampong China Peranakan, ed. Rosita Abdullah Lau, 34–37. Kuala Lumpur: My Viscom Editions Sdn Bhd.
Ravichandran, M. 2009. The evolution of the Chitty community of Melaka. Jebat 36: 1–15. Schlesinger, P. 1991. Media, the political order and national identity. Media, Culture and Society 13(3): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016344391013003002.
Suryadinata, L. 2015. Introduction. In Peranakan communities in the era of decolonization and globalization, ed. L. Suryadinata, xi–xv. Singapore: Chinese Heritage Centre.
Tan, C.B. 2002. Chinese minority in a Malay state: The case of Terengganu in Malaysia. Singapore: Times Media Private Limited.
________2013. Chinatowns: A reflection. In Chinatowns around the world: Gilded ghetto, ethnopolis and cultural diaspora, eds. B.P. Wong and C.B. Tan, 263–283. Leiden: Brill.
Tan, Y.S. and Kamarudin Ngah. 2013a. Identity maintenance and identity shift: The case of the Tirok Chinese Peranakan in Terengganu. Asian Ethnicity 14(1): 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2012.710401.
________2013b. Socio-historical development of the Kampong Cina settlement in Kuala Terengganu. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
________2015. Culture, identity and foodways of the Terengganu Chinese. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
Teo, G.L. 2002. Sikap masyarakat Cina luar bandar Terengganu terhadap konsep negara Islam ala-PAS: Satu kajian kes di Kampung Banggol Kemang-Tirok. Academic exercise, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation. 2015. [Preservation Glossary] Today’s word: Heritage tourism. 17 June. https://savingplaces.org/stories/preservation-glossary-todays-word-heritage-tourism#.WxONRVOFMnU (accessed 2 June 2018).
The Star. 2019. Tourism target achieved. 16 March. https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2019/03/16/tourism-target-achieved/ (accessed 8 March 2020).
The Sun Daily. 2017. Terengganu targets tourism to contribute 30% to state’s economy. 19 September. http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/09/19/terengganu-targets-tourism-contribute-30-states-economy (accessed 2 June 2018).
________2018. Terengganu targets 5.5 million tourists this year. 2 February. http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2018/02/02/terengganu-targets-55-milliontourists-year (accessed 2 June 2018).
Tourism Malaysia. 2014. About Malaysia. http://www.tourism.gov.my/en/my/about-malaysia (accessed 16 November 2014).
________2015. Facts and figures. http://corporate.tourism.gov.my/research.asp?page=facts_figures (accessed 15 September 2015).
Wong, B.P. 2013. Introduction: Chinatowns around the world. In Chinatowns around the world: Gilded ghetto, ethnopolis and cultural diaspora, eds. B.P. Wong and C.B. Tan, 1–18. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255906_002
Wood, R.E. 1997. Tourism and the state: Ethnic options and constructions of otherness. In Tourism, ethnicity and the state in Asian and Pacific society, eds. M. Picard and R. Wood, 1–34. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
Worden, N. 2010. National identity and heritage tourism in Melaka. In Heritage tourism in Southeast Asia, eds. M. Hitchcock, V.T. King and M. Parnwell, 130–146. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
World Monument Fund. n.d. Kampung Cina River Frontage. https://www.wmf.org/project/kampung-cina-river-frontage (accessed 2 June 2018).
Wolcott, H.F. 1999. Ethnography: A way of seeing. Lanham: AltaMira Press.