Get the jab: Government multisemiotic legitimation of COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present article studies how the government of Malaysia legitimises COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccination is a whole government endeavour but the Special Committee on COVID-19 Vaccine Supply (Jawatankuasa Khas Jaminan Akses Vaksin COVID-19 [JKJAV]) is the central government organisation that manages national-level vaccination. The management involves a discursive aspect and the discourse on social media sites should be explored because it frames beliefs and practices about vaccines. A qualitative analysis of legitimating strategies and their language and image features were conducted on Malay language posts on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter from February 2021 to July 2021. The posts discursively legitimise COVID-19 vaccines in terms of their characteristics and benefits. The multisemiotic legitimation is achieved by mixing rationalisation, moralisation and authorisation. JKJAV proposes that vaccines are the best means of protection, encouraged by various sources. Cumulatively, the vaccine favourable discourse makes vaccination an exercise of personal choice by an individual. The agency is justified by rational, moral and authoritative reasons, to recreate social dynamics before the pandemic.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Berrocal, M., M. Kranert, P. Attolino, J.B. Santos, S.G. Santamaria, N. Henaku, A.L. Koffi,
C. Marziani V. Mažeikienė, D. Pérez, K. Rajandran and A. Salamurović. 2021. Constructing collective identities and solidarity in premiers’ early speeches on COVID-19: A global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication 8: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00805-x
Betsch, C., N. Brewer, P. Brocard, P. Davies, W. Gaissmaier, N. Haase, J. Leask, F. Renkewitz, B. Renner, V. Reyna, C. Rossmann, K. Sachse, A. Schachinger, M. Siegrist and M. Stryk. 2012. Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine 30(25): 3727-3733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
Betsch, C., F. Renkewitz, T. Betsch and C. Ulshöfer. 2010. The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. Journal of Health Psychology 15(3): 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309353647
Blankenship, E., M. Goff, J. Yin, Z. Tsz, K. -W. Fu, L. Hai, N. Saroha and I. Fung. 2018. Sentiment, contents, and retweets: A study of two vaccine-related Twitter datasets. The Permanente Journal 22: 17–138. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-138
Brewer, N., G. Chapman, A. Rothman, J. Leask and A. Kempe. 2017. Increasing vaccination: Putting psychological science into action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 18(3): 149–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618760521
Broniatowski, D., K. Hilyard and M. Dredze. 2016. Effective vaccine communication during the Disneyland measles outbreak. Vaccine 34(28): 3225–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.044
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. 2018. Immunization: The basics. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm (accessed 19 August 2021).
Chaidas, D. 2018. The benefits of narratology in the analysis of multimodal legitimation: The case of New Democracy. Discourse and Communication 12(3): 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757770
Colson, V. 2011. Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news. Journalism 12(7): 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412834
Daugherty, T., H. Gangadharbatla and L. Bright. 2010. Telepresence and persuasion. In Immersed in media: Telepresence in everyday life, eds. C. Bracken and P. Skalski, 113–136. New York: Routledge.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2021. Employment statistics first quarter 2021. https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epProductCatalogForm.seam?cid=396558 (accessed 18 August 2021).
. 2019. Statistics yearbook 2019. https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epFreeDownloadContentSearch.seam?cid=396677 (accessed 18 August 2021)
Digital Influence Lab. 2020. Malaysia digital marketing statistics 2020. https://digitalinfluencelab.com/malaysia-digital-marketing-stats/ (accessed 18 August 2021).
Dredze, M., D. Broniatowski, M. Smith and K. Hilyard. 2016. Understanding vaccine refusal. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 50(4): 550–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.002
Dubé, E., D. Gagnon and N. MacDonald. 2015. Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine 33(34): 4191–4203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041
Dunn, A., D. Surian, J. Leask, A. Dey, K. Mandl and E. Coiera. 2017. Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States. Vaccine 35(23): 3033–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.060
du Pré, A. and B. Overton. 2021. Communicating about health. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fowler, E., S. Gollust, A. Dempsey, P. Lantz and P. Ubel. 2012. Issue emergence, evolution of controversy, and implications for competitive framing: the case of the HPV vaccine. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17(2): 169–189.
Halliday, M. and C. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Harvey, K. and N. Koteyko. 2013. Exploring health communication. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096437
Iacobucci, G. 2019. Vaccination: “Fake news” on social media may be harming UK uptake, report warns. BMJ 364:1365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l365
JKJAV 2021. Program imunisasi COVID-19 kebangsaan. https://www.vaksincovid.gov.my/pdf/Program_Imunisasi_COVID-19_Kebangsaan_Versi_Bahasa_Malaysia. pdf (accessed 18 August 2021).
Kata, A. 2010. A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28(7): 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
Kearney, M., P. Selvan, M. Hauer, E. Leader and P. Massey. 2019. Characterizing HPV vaccine sentiments and content on Instagram. Health Education & Behavior 46(2S): 37–48.
Ledin, P. and D. Machin. 2018. Doing visual analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
Mackay, R. 2015. Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence. Discourse & Society 26(3): 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564737
Mishler, E. 1984. The discourse of medicine. Norwood: Ablex.
Mohr, S. and K. Frederikson. 2020. A constructed reality? A Fairclough-inspired critical discourse analysis of the Danish HPV controversy. Qualitative Health Research 30(7): 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320909098
Moran, M., M. Lucas, K. Everhart, A. Morgan and E. Prickett. 2016. What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 9(3): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2016.1235531
Neneng Nurlaela Arief, Siti Karlinah, Yanti Setianti and Sri Susilawati. 2018. Counterfeit vaccines in Indonesia: Managing the issue through media. Journal of Communication Management 22(4): 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2018-0081
Rajandran, K. 2020. ‘A long battle ahead’: Malaysian and Singaporean Prime Ministers employ war metaphors for COVID-19. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 20(3): 261–267. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2003-15
Reyes, A. 2011. Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society 22(6): 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
Schmidt, A., F. Zollo, A. Scala, C. Betsch and W. Quattrociocchi. 2018. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine 36(25): 3606–3612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040
van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and social practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
Wang, G. 2020. Legitimization strategies in China’s official media: The 2018 vaccine scandal in China. Social Semiotics 30(5): 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766262
Ward, S. and J. Budarick. 2020. Adopting to the postmodern medical paradigm: How the Daily Telegraph used emotion and anecdote to legitimize vaccination. Media International Australia 181(1): 103–119.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2017. Communicating risk in public health emergencies. Geneva: World Health Organization.