The Role of Institutions and Industrial Policy: The Constraints of Industrial Development in Sabah

Main Article Content

Firdausi Suffian

Abstract

This article examines the role played by institutions in Sabah’s industrial development. Industrialisation is widely acknowledged as the key to pursuing structural change and attaining an economy-wide accumulation of capabilities because it involves capital-intensive activities that require investments in physical capital, human capital and technological advancement, all of which lead to the modernisation of the state’s economy. Thus, the configuration of a nation’s industrial policy is central to expanding and diversifying downstream activities. Nonetheless, effective industrial policy implementation depends on the role played by institutions that take elite policy actors into account when configuring economic interests and priorities. In the case of Sabah, although the state is rich in resources, the implementation of its industrial policy seems to have been impeded by certain factors. Political influence is embedded in existing institutions, and there are uneven power relations, patronage and rent-seeking behaviours. These have collectively constrained industrial policy arrangements and implementation. This study employs qualitative methods, gathering primary data via elite interviews and augmenting this with extensive secondary sources.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Firdausi Suffian. 2024. “The Role of Institutions and Industrial Policy: The Constraints of Industrial Development in Sabah”. Kajian Malaysia 42 (1): 43‒69. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2024.42.1.3.
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, I. 2003. Spearheading the manufacturing sector as a major contributor of growth. In Reinventing Sabah: Global challenges and policy responses, eds. J. Yaakub and S.Y. Chong, 133–146. Kota Kinabalu: Institute for Development Studies (Sabah).

Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson. 2008. The role of institutions in growth and development. Commission on Growth and Development, Working paper no.10, The World Bank.

Agus, Y.M. 2001. Sabah politics under Pairin. Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 6: 1–20.

Alavi, H. 1982. State and class under peripheral capitalism. In Introduction to the sociology of developing countries, eds. H. Alavi and T. Shanin, London: Macmillan Press.

Amsden, A.H. 2001. The rise of ‘the rest’: Challenges to the West from late industrialising economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Andreoni, A. and H.J. Chang. 2019. The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 48: 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.10.007

Athukorala, P.C. 2011. Growing with global production sharing: The tale of Penang export hub. Working papers in Trade and Development 2011/13, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra. http://crawford.anu.edu.au/acde/publications/#working-papers (accessed 27 February 2021).

______. 2014. Industrialisation through state-MNC partnership: Lesson from Malaysia national car project. Working Paper No. 2014/06, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Australian National University.

Athukorala, P.C. and S. Narayan. 2017. Economic corridors and regional development: The Malaysian experience, Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series.

Best, M. 2020. How growth really happens: the making of economic miracles through production, governance and skills. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chan, J. 2018. New Sabah govt mulls lifting ban on export of timber logs. Malay Mail. 22 December. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/12/22/new-sabah-govt-mulls-lifting-ban-on-export-of-timber-logs/1934243 (accessed 5 May 2021).

Chang, H.J. 1994. State, institutions and structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5(2): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(94)90006-X

______. 2003. Industrial policy and East Asia: The miracle, the crisis and the future. In Manufacturing competitiveness in Asia, ed. K.S. Jomo, 23. London: Routledge.

______. 2011. Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics 7(4): 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000378

Chang, H.J. and A. Andreoni. 2017. Bringing production and employment back into development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10: 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00359-3

Chang, H.J. and P. Evans. 2005. The role of institutions in economic change. In Reimagining growth, eds. G. Dymski and S. Da Paula. London: Zed Press.

Cimoli, M., G. Dosi and J. Stiglitz. 2009. Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Estache, A. and R. Foucart. 2016. Corruption and incompetence in public procurement. Working Paper 2016-05, Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

Evans, P. 1995. Embedded autonomy, states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gomez, E.T. 2014. Government-linked companies, the financial sector, and socioeconomic development in Malaysia. London: Routledge

______. 2018. Business as usual: Regime change and government-linked companies in Malaysia. Global Asia. https://www.globalasia.org/v14no1/focus/business-as-usual-regime-change-and-government-linked-companies-in-malaysia_edmund-terence-gomez (accessed 12 January 2021).

Hollingworth, R.J. 2000. Doing institutional analysis: Implication for the study of innovation. Review of International Political Economy 7(4): 595–644.

Hoyle, B.S. 1980. Economic development of Sabah. Geography Association Journal 65(4): 284–296.

Hutchinson, F.E. 2014. Malaysia’s federal system: Over and covert centralisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 44(3): 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.878374

Hydrocarbon. 2008. Sabah-Sarawak gas pipeline. https://www.hydrocarbons-technology.com/projects/sabah-sarawak/ (accessed 25 July 2021).

Johnson, C. 1999. The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Jomo, K.S. 1993. Industrializing Malaysia: Policy, performance, prospects. London: Routledge.

______. 2007. Industrialisation and industrial policy in Malaysia. In Malaysian industrial policy, eds. K.S. Jomo, 1–34. Singapore: NUS Press.

Jomo, K.S., C.Y. Chung, B.C. Folk, I. ul-Haque, P. Phongpaichit, B. Simatupang and M. Tateishi. 1997. Southeast Asia’s misunderstood miracle: Industrial policy and economic development in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Oxford: Westview Press.

Jomo, K.S. and C.H. Wee. 2014. Malaysia@50: Economic development, distribution and disparities. Kuala Lumpur: Strategic Information and Research Development Malaysia.

Kaldor, N. 1967. Strategic factors in economic development. New York: Ithaca.

Kar, S., A. Roy and K. Sen. 2019. Double trap institutions and development. Economic Modelling 76: 243–259.

Kaur, A. 1998. Economic change in East Malaysia: Sabah and Sarawak since 1850. Basingstoke: MacMillan.

Khan, M.H. 1998. Patron-client networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. European Journal of Development Research 10: 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819808426700

______. 2000. Rents, efficiency and growth. In Rents, rent seeking and economic development: Theory and evidence in Asia, eds. M.H. Khan and K.S. Jomo, 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leftwich, A. 2010. Beyond institutions: Rethinking the role of leaders, elites and coalitions in the institutional formation of developmental states and strategies. Forum for Development Studies 37(1): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410903558327

Lim, R. 2008. Federal-state relations in Sabah, Malaysia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Loh, K.W. 2010. Restructuring federal–state relations in Malaysia: From centralised to co-operative federalism. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs 99(407): 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358531003656180

MPC (Malaysia Productivity Corporation). 2016. High cost of doing business in Sabah. https://www.mpc.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Chapter-8.pdf (accessed 13 June 2021).

March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. 1984. The new institutionalism: Organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840

McMorrow, J. and M.A. Talip. 2001. Decline of forest area in Sabah, Malaysia: Relationship to state policies, land code and land capability. Global Environment Change 11: 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00059-5

McNamara, D.L. 2012. Corporatism and Korean capitalism. New York: Routledge.

MID (Ministry of Industrial Development). 1987. Sabah action blueprint 1987. Sabah: Sabah Government Press.

______. 1996. Sabah industrial master plan 1996. Sabah: Sabah Government Press.

______. 2000. Sabah industrial action plan 2000–2005. Sabah: Sabah Government Press. MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry). 1986. First Industrial Master Plan 1986–1995. Kuala Lumpur: Industrial Policy Division, MITI.

Mulok, D., K. Mansor and M. Kogid. 2015. Sabah development corridor (SDC). Paper presented at Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke-10, Melaka. 18–20 September.

Myrdal, G. 1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: G. Duckworth. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

______. 1991. Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97

Rafiq, I. and K. Mansur. 2020. Sabah economic model: An overview. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences 10(3): 475–484. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v10-i3/8156

Rasiah, R. 1996. Innovations and institutions Moving towards the technology frontier in Malaysia’s electronics industry. Journal of Industry Studies 3(2): 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719600000008

Rasiah, R. 2020. Industrial policy and industrialization in South East Asia. In The Oxford handbook of industrial policy, eds. A. Oqubay, C. Cramer, H.J. Chang and R. Kozul-Wright, 680–715. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rasiah, R. and I. Shari. 2001. Market, government and Malaysia’s new economic policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 57–78.

Rodrik, D. 2000. Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire theme. Studies in Comparative International Development 35(3): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699764

Rodrik, D., A. Subramaniam and F. Trebbi. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9: 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85

SDC (Sabah Development Corridor). 2006. Sabah Development Corridor Blueprint 2006–2025. Kota Kinabalu: Institute for Development Studies (Sabah).

Sabah. 1963. Sabah Annual Report, 1963. Jesselton: Government Printing Department.

Second Malaysia Plan. 1971–1975. Kuala Lumpur: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department.

Scott, W.R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Steinmo, S. 2008. Historical institutionalism. In Approaches and methodologies in the social science: A pluralist perspectives, eds. D.D. Porta and M. Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suffian, F. 2019. The role of institutions and development: The political economy of Malaysia’s industrial policy-making. Journal of Administrative Science 16(1): 1–33.

Suffian, F. 2021. Political economy of Malaysia industrial policy: Institutional capacity and automotive industry. London: Springer.

Tan, J. 2009. Can the East Asian developmental state be replicated? The case of Malaysia. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Thelen, K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369

Wade, R. 2018. The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change 49(4): 518–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12381

Wee, C.H. 1995. Sabah and Sarawak in the Malaysian Economy. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Social Analysis.

Weiss, L. 1995. Governed interdependence: Rethinking the government-business relationship in East Asia. The Pacific Review 8(4): 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749508719160

Whitfield, L. and L. Buur. 2014. The politics of industrial policy: Ruling elites and their alliances. Third World Quarterly 35(1): 126–144.

Whitley, R. 2003. How national are business system? The role of different state types and complementary institutions in constructing homogenous systems of economic coordination and control. Manchester: Manchester Business School.

Witt, M. and G. Redding. 2013. Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review 11(2): 265–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt002

World Islamic Economic Forum. 2020. Sabah’s development-centric budget to transform the state’s economy—Chief Minister. https://wief.org/news/sabahs-development-centric-budget-to-transform-the-states-economy-chief-minister/ (accessed 13 June 2021).