Motivations for Activism: Exploring Bersih Activists’ Communicative Ecologies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media provides people with new ways of approaching and engaging in politics. This article explores how Bersih activists develop new communicative practices and motivations for their activism. The study investigates the communicative strategies that they employed in using social media to mobilise their supporters and explores their personal communicative experiences, which are likely to enhance their public commitment. This study draws on data collected from a longitudinal study conducted before and after the 14th General Election (GE14) in 2018, which saw the fall of the dominant Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition after ruling continuously for six decades. Findings show Bersih activism uses mediated and unmediated communication strategies in mobilisation, each of which is organised in a particular way that connects activists with their local and global networks. This study concludes that motivation moderates the three layers of activists’ communicative ecology and the integration of social media into their everyday life helps to actualise collective affordances. Bersih activists use social media to deliver truthful information about their activism as this helps to combat the distribution of fake news, and reinforce the political participation that helps to sustain Malaysian democracy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Altheide, D.L. 1994. An ecology of communication: Toward a mapping of the effective environment. The Sociological Quarterly 35(4): 665–683.
Bennett, W.L. and A. Segerberg. 2011. Digital media and the personalization of collective action. Information, Communication and Society 14(6): 770–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141
______. 2012. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication and Society 15(5): 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
______. 2013. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boulianne, S. 2015. Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication and Society 18(5): 524–538. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Breese, E.B. 2011. Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory 21: 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01379.x
Buchanan, T. 2020. Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation. PLOS ONE 15(10): e0239666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
Castells, M. 2012. Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Chichester: Wiley.
Chan, T.C. 2018. Democratic breakthrough in Malaysia: Political opportunities and the role of Bersih. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37(3): 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700306
Chon, M.G. and H. Park. 2020. Social media activism in the digital age: Testing an integrative model of activism on contentious issues. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 97(1): 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019835896
Diani, M. 1992. The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review 40: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
Earl, J., J. Hunt, R.K. Garrett and A. Dal. 2014. New technologies and social movements. In The Oxford handbook of social movements, eds. D. della Porta, and M. Diani, 355–366. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, M. 2019. Civil society. Cambridge: Polity.
Foth, M. and G. Hearn. 2007. Networked individualism of urban residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings. Information, Communication and Society 10(5): 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658095
Fuchs, C. 2014. Social media: A critical introduction. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.
Gerbaudo, P. and E. Treré. 2015. In search of the “we” of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication and Society 18: 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043319
Gilchrist, A. 2009. The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development. 2nd ed. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity.
Harlow, S. 2011. Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media and Society 14: 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410408
Ikegami, E. 2000. A sociological theory of publics: Identity and culture as emergent properties in networks. Social Research 67(4): 989-1029.
Jenkins, J.C. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527–553. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2946077
Johns, A. and N. Cheong. 2019. Feeling the chill: Bersih 2.0, state censorship, and “Networked Affect” on Malaysian social media 2012–2018. Social Media+ Society 5(2): 1–12. https://doi.org/2056305118821801
Johns, A. 2020. ‘This will be the WhatsApp election’: Crypto-publics and digital citizenship in Malaysia’s GE14 election. First Monday 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i1.10381
Kavada, A. 2015. Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication and Society 18: 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
Khoo, G.C. 2013. Bersih dan Ubah: Citizenship rights, intergenerational togetherness and multicultural unity in Malaysia. In Worlding multiculturalisms: The politics of Inter-Asian Dwelling, ed. D.S. Goh, 109–126. London: Routledge.
Khoo, Y.H. 2014. Electoral reform movement in Malaysia: Emergence, protest, and reform. Suvannabhumi 6(2): 85–106. http://doi.org/10.22801/svn.2014.6.2.85
Kunst, J.R., B. Boos, S.Y. Kimel, M. Obaidi, M. Shani and L. Thomsen. 2018. Engaging in extreme activism in support of others’ political struggles: The role of politically motivated fusion with out-groups. PLOS ONE 13(1): e0190639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190639
Lee, F. and J.M. Chan. 2016. Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication and Society 19(1): 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530
Lim, J.B.Y. 2014. Rhizomatic behaviours in social media: v-logging and the independent film industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Cultural Studies 17(5): 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913505177
______. 2017. Engendering civil resistance: Social media and mob tactics in Malaysia. International Journal of Cultural Studies 20(2): 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916683828
Lim, M. 2012. Clicks, cabs and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication 62(2): 231–248. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
______. 2013. Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(4): 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386
______. 2017. Digital media and Malaysia’s electoral reform movement. In Citizenship and democratization in Southeast Asia, eds. W. Berenschot, H.S. Nordholt and L. Bakker, 211–237. Brill: Leiden.
Mattoni, A. 2017. A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies 16(4): 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250
McCarthy, J.D. and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212–1241. Montagno, M.J., J.J. Garrett-Walker and J.T.T. Ho. 2021. Two, four, six, eight… why we want to participate: Motivations and barriers to LGBTQ+ activism. Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology 31: 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2528
Nadzri, M.M.N. 2018. The 14th general election, the fall of Barisan Nasional and political development in Malaysia, 1957–2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37(3): 139–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700307
Neo, R. 2021. The failed construction of fake news as a security threat in Malaysia. Contemporary Politics 27(3): 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1884397
New Straits Times. 2017. Speech by PM Najib Razak at 2017 Global Transformation Forum. 22 March. https://www.nst.com.my/news/2017/03/223260/full-text-speech-pm-najib-razak-2017-global-transformation-forum
Ngu, I.Y. 2021. Personalized communicative ecologies: The role of social media in the Bersih movement’s mobilization. PhD diss., Curtin University.
Norris, P. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pandey, V., S. Gupta and M. Chattopadhyay. 2019. A framework for understanding citizens’ political participation in social media. Information, Technology & People 33(4): 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2018-0140
Poell, T. 2014. Social media and the transformation of activist communication: Exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Information, Communication and Society 17(6): 716–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.812674
Postill, J. 2014. A critical history of internet activism and social protest in Malaysia 1998–2011. Asiascape: Digital Asia Journal 1–2: 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340006
Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Selvanathan, H.P., Y.H. Khoo and B. Lickel. 2020. The role of movement leaders in building intergroup solidarity for social change: A case of the electoral reform movement in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Psychology 50(1): 224–238. https://doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.2598
Seol, S., H. Lee, J. Yu and H. Zo. 2016. Continuance usage of corporate SNS pages: A communicative ecology perspective. Information and Management 53(1) :740–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.010
Subramaniam, S. 2011. Assessing political dynamics in contemporary Malaysia: Implications for democratic change. AsiaNetwork Exchange 19(1): 42–52.
Tacchi, J., D. Slater and G. Hearn. 2003. Ethnographic action research: A user’s handbook. New Delhi: UNESCO.
Tacchi, J. and J. Watkins. 2007. Participatory research and creative engagement with ICTs. Paper presented at Proceedings ACM Sensys 2007 workshop: Sensing on everyday mobile phones in support of participatory research, the Sensys Conference Hotel, the Swissôtel Sydney.
Tapsell, R. 2018. The smartphone as the “weapon of the weak”: Assessing the role of communication technologies in Malaysia’s regime change. Journal of Current SoutheastAsianAffairs37(3):9–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700302
Tilly, C. 2004. Social movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers, LLC.
Tye, M., C. Leong, F. Tan, B. Tan and Y.H. Khoo. 2018. Social media for empowerment in social movements: The case of Malaysia’s grassroots activism. Communications of the Associations for Information Systems 42(15): 408–430. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04215
Weiss, M.L. 2013. Parsing the power of “new media” in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(4): 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.759332
Welsh, B. 2011. People power in Malaysia: Bersih rally and its aftermath. Asia Pacific Bulletin 128. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/system/tdf/private/apb128.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=33000 (accessed 10 August 2018).
Woolley, S.C. and P.N. Howard. 2018. Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, X., C. Lampe and N.B. Ellison. 2016. The social media ecology: User perceptions, strategies and challenges. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858333