Pakatan Harapan’s performance in the 2021 Sarawak State Election
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to examine the performance of Pakatan Harapan (PH) in the 2021 Sarawak State Election (SSE21). It explains the three main reasons for PH’s dismal showing. First, local-based political parties took advantage of structural weaknesses in Sarawak PH and managed to convince Sarawakians that state rights could only be protected by political entities controlled by Sarawak leaders. Second, the “Sarawak First” sentiment changed the political landscape of Sarawak and increased the sense of solidarity among Sarawakians. It was the driving force behind the campaign messages of the local-based political parties that resonated well among the majority of the Sarawakian voters. Third, the three PH coalition parties in Sarawak, namely Democratic Action Party (DAP), Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and Parti Amanah Negara (AMANAH) did not have a common political ideology to bind them together, strengthening the common belief that DAP, PKR and AMANAH came together simply out of convenience to gain power. In order to survive in Sarawak, PH needs to rebuild its image and political strategies relevant to the needs of the Sarawakians voters. This article is based on data from online media sources and observations made during the election on 18 December 2021.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anand, R. 2021. Sarawak polls feature many firsts, but no shocks anticipated. The Straits Times, 5 December. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/sarawak-polls-features-many-firsts-but-no-shocks-anticipated (accessed 6 December 2021).
Awang Azman Awang Pawi, Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Rosmadi Fauzi and Suffian Mansor. 2016. The rise of politic ethnonationalism in the state of Sarawak Borneo. Journal of Scientific Research and Development 3(7): 78–85.
Case, W. 2019. Politics in Malaysia today: Demise of the hybrid? Not so fast. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 15(2): 1–29.
Chin, J. 2015. The ‘Pek Moh’ factor and the Sarawak parliamentary seats. In Coalitions in collision: Malaysia’s 13th general elections, eds. J. Savaranamuttu, H.G. Lee and Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman, 181–198. Petaling Jaya: SIRD/ISEAS. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814620659-011
. 2018. Sabah and Sarawak in the 14th General Election 2018 (GE14): Local factors and state nationalism. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37(3): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700308
Goh, P.P. 2021a. DAP’s poor showing in Sarawak polls due to its 22-month failure at the federal level. New Straits Times, 19 December. https://www.nst.com.my/news/politics/2021/12/755893/daps-poor-showing-sarawak-polls-due-its-22-month-failure-federal-level (accessed 22 December 2021).
. 2021b. Experts: Unlike GPS, Sarawak PH has no solid ideology, framework to bind member parties. New Straits Times, 28 November. https://www.nst.com.my/news/politics/2021/11/749527/experts-unlike-gps-sarawak-ph-has-no-solid-ideology-framework-bind (accessed 1 December 2021).
. 2021c. Sarawak DAP’s defeat due to low turnout among Chinese voters in urban seats. New Straits Times, 29 December. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/12/758762/sarawak-daps-defeat-due-low-turnout-among-chinese-voters-urban-seats (accessed 2 January 2022).
Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor. 2018. The 14th General Election, the fall of Barisan Nasional, and political development in Malaysia, 1957–2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37(3): 139–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700307
Nur Atika Hairi. 2018. Coalition politics among opposition parties in Malaysia: A case study of Pakatan Rakyat (2008–2016). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR) 129: 173–181. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsps-17.2018.36
Onn, L.P. and K. Zhang. 2021. What awaits Sarawak in the state election? ISEAS Perspective 165: 1–17. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2021-165-what-awaits-sarawak-in-the-state-election-by-lee-poh-onn-and-kevin-zhang/
Ostwald, K. 2020. Malaysia 2020: The impasse of two-coalition politics. ISEAS Perspective 25: 1–8. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ISEAS_Perspective_2020_25.pdf.
Ostwald, K. and S. Oliver. 2020. Four arenas: Malaysia’s 2018 election, reform, and democratization. Democratization 27(4): 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1713757
Ufen, A. 2020. Opposition in transition: Pre-electoral coalitions and the 2018 electoral breakthrough in Malaysia. Democratization 27(2): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1666266
. 2021. The downfall of Pakatan Harapan in Malaysia: Coalitions during transition.
Asian Survey 61(2): 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2021.61.2.273
Wan Saiful Wan Jan. 2020. Why did BERSATU leave Pakatan Harapan? Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814881906
Weiss, M.L. and A. Puyok. 2017. The 2016 Sarawak State Election old stories and new punch lines. In Electoral dynamics in Sarawak: Contesting developmentalism and rights, eds. M.L. Weiss and A. Puyok, 1–22. Petaling Jaya: SIRD/ISEAS. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814762823-004
Welsh, B. 2020. Malaysia’s political polarization: Race, religion and reform. In Political polarization in South and Southeast Asia: Old divisions, new dangers, eds.
T. Carothers and A. O’Donohue, 41–52. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endownment for International Peace.
Yeoh, T. 2020. Federal-state friction: Amid Malaysia’s dual political and pandemic plight. New Mandala, 12 August. https://www.newmandala.org/federal-state-friction-amid-malaysias-dual-political-and-pandemic-plight/ (accessed 2 January 2022).