Visitors’ Interaction in an Experiential Designed Environment: A Case Study of a Multimedia Gallery
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, there has been a shift in the built environment in creating engaging exhibition spaces such as museums and galleries. This is a challenge nowadays as the creation of digital exhibition spaces depend largely on technological content and devices. Issues arise where visitors may not perceive the intended environment. It is seen that this sense of change needs further study on visitors’ perception and behaviour as users of the space. Experiential design deals with human interaction with the built environment. The objective of this study is to observe how visitors’ behaviour and interaction are influenced by the experiential design concept. A case study is conducted at a local gallery with selected visitor profile of young adults and adults with art and design background. The investigation is done based on the case study guideline, mapping out setting, and timing and tracking observation method to gauge visitors’ perception and action in a multimedia gallery. Eighty visitors were observed throughout the three-day exhibition from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Data collected answers the research question: how does the experiential design concept influence visitors’ behaviour and interaction in a multimedia gallery? The findings are beneficial to understand gallery visitors’ needs in achieving fulfilling interactive and engaging experience. From the observation done, it is identified that multimedia galleries incorporated with experiential design elements build meaningful experiences through the five senses, promotes a sense of place and well-being as well as the allowance for visitors to be more confident in approaching tools and devices that are unfamiliar to them. Curators, designers and artists will gain from this research in designing better interactive environment. The research limitation is the visitor age group which is the young adults and adults’ age group, as well as the single case study done.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
American Association of Museums. 2012. TrendsWatch2012: Museums and the pulse of the future. https://www.aam-us.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2012_trendswatch.pdf
Barton, J. and B. Meszaros. 2021. Extending the museum-visitor experience. Society for Experiential Graphic Design. https://segd.org/extending-museum-visitor-experience
Bowen, G. A. 2005. Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report 10(2): 208–222. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1846
Chan, J. K. L. 2009. The consumption of museum service experiences: Benefits and value of museum experiences. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management 18(2–3): 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620802590209
Crowe, S. et al. 2011. The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 11: 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Del Chiappa, G., L. Andreu, and M. G. Gallarza. 2014. Emotions and visitors’ satisfaction at a museum. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research 8(4): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-03-2014-0024
Demaria, K. n.d. Experiential design and interior spaces: The new movement that is shaping the way we connect. Retrieved from https://www.terramai.com/blog/experiential-design-interior-spaces/
Dika, P. 2020. Review of Oliver Grau, Janina Hoth, & Eveline Wandl-Vogt (Eds.) (2019). Digital art through the looking glass: New strategies for archiving, collecting and preserving in digital humanities. Postdigital Science and Education 2: 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00100-z
Duguleana, M. et al. 2019. VR technologies in cultural heritage: First international conference, VRTCH 2018 Brasov, Romania, May 29–30, 2018, revised selected papers. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05819-7
Falk, J. H. and L. D. Dierking. 2000. Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Fallah, S. M. and S. M. Fallah. 2015. Identifying environmental affordance in design case study: Kerman, Iran. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences 5(7S): 445–450.
Forrest, R. 2015. Design factors in the museum visitor experience. PhD diss., The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.296
Geismar, H. 2018. Museum object lessons for the digital age. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351714
Gensler. 2017. Experience Index. Gensler Research Institute. https://www.gensler.com/uploads/document/552/file/Gensler-Experience-Index-2017.pdf
Giannini, T. and J. P. Bowen. 2016. Curating Digital Life and Culture: Art and information. Proceedings of Electronic Visualisation and the Arts Conference, London, UK. 12–14 July. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2016.46
———. 2017. Life in code and digits: When Shannon met Turing. Proceedings of Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London, UK. 11–13 July. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/eva2017.9
———. 2018. Of museums and digital culture: A landscape view. Proceedings of Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London, UK. 9–13 July. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2018.34
Glover, J. and J. Linowes. 2019. Complete virtual reality and augmented reality development with Unity. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.
González-Rodríguez, M. R., A. M. Domínguez-Quintero, and B. Paddison. 2020. The direct and indirect influence of experience quality on satisfaction: The importance of emotions. Current Issues in Tourism 23(22): 2779–2797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1668917
Guba, E. G. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ 29(2): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
Harada, T. et al. 2018. Museum experience design based on multi-sensory transformation approach. 15th International Design Conference (DESIGN 2018), Dubrovnik, Croatia. 21–24 May. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0150
Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2000. Changing values in the art museum: rethinking communication and learning. International Journal of Heritage Studies 6: 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272500363715
iCreative. 2017. Installation art. https://icreativeox.xyz/2017/08/22/installation-art/ (accessed 24 July 2021).
Kotler, N. and P. Kotler. 2000. Can museums be all things to all people?: Missions, goals, and marketing’s role. Museum Management and Curatorship 18(3): 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770000301803
Lang, J. 2011. Creating architectural theory: The role of behavioral sciences in environment design, trans. A. Eynifar. Tehran: Tehran University publications.
Levent, N. S. and A. Pascual-Leone. 2014. The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory, and space. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Li, Y. C., A. W. C. Liew, and W. P. Su. 2012. The digital museum: Challenges and solution. ICIDT 2012: 8th International Conference on Information Science and Digital Content Technology 3: 646–649.
Matthews, G. and P. Buxton. 2018. Museums, art galleries and temporary exhibition spaces. In Metric handbook: Planning and design data, 6th Edition, ed. P. Buxton. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230726
McIntosh, A. J. 1999. Into the tourist’s mind: Understanding the value of the heritage experience. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 8(1): 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v08n01_03
Motalebi, G. 2001. Psychology of the environment, a new science in the service of architecture and urban designing. Honar- Ha-Ye-Ziba Journal 10: 52–67.
Parker, E. and M. Saker. 2020. Art museums and the incorporation of virtual reality: Examining the impact of VR on spatial and social norms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 26(5–6): 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519897251
Recupero, A. et al. 2019. Bridging museum mission to visitors’ experience: Activity, meanings, interactions, technology. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02092
Reinwardt Academie. 2013. Museum Experience as defined by John Falk and Lynn Dierking 2013. Slideshare. https://www.slideshare.net/RubenSmit/museumexperience-as-defined-by-john-falk-lynn-dierking-2013
Schensul, S. L, J. J. Schensul, and M. D. LeCompte. 1999. Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Book 2, ethnographer’s toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Serrell, B. 1998. Paying attention: Visitors and museum exhibitions. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums. Simon, N. 2010. The participatory museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
StudioVN. 2019. What is experiential design? Why is it important for the construction industry? https://www.estudiovn.com/post/experiential-design-interiors
Varitlova, D. A. 2019. Museum as an element of multicultural space. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science Engineering 698(3): 033032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/698/3/033032
Vesci, M. et al. 2021. The mediating role of visitor satisfaction in the relationship between museum experience and word of mouth: Evidence from Italy. The TQM Journal 33(1): 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2020-0022