Interactive Theatre: An Alternative Method of Teaching and Learning for Rural Young Children in Sekolah Kebangsaan Pekan Ranau, Sabah
Main Article Content
Abstract
Compared with children in urban areas, children living in rural areas experience a severe lack of exposure to alternative teaching and learning activities to enhance their self-potential. This development affects their opportunity to explore knowledge comprehensively. The Education Development Master Plan by the Ministry of Education identified five education gaps in the Malaysian education system. Among them are the urban and rural gaps and the gap between student achievement levels. In Malaysia, most districts that recorded the lowest performance in Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah are in Sabah and Sarawak. This fact is the foundation factor to justify the implementation of this study in Sekolah Kebangsaan Pekan Ranau, located in the rural district of Ranau in Sabah. A total of 60 level one students were involved in the research, which took place from 2017 until 2019. In other developments, the inclusion of theatre as part of the school curriculum in most urban areas in Malaysia has indicated a formal acceptance of the value of theatre as an educational tool. Therefore, this research focuses on using interactive theatre to develop teaching and learning strategies for young children in rural areas. Interactive theatre is a performance that engages the audience and makes them active participants in the show. It brings the audience into the same playing space as the actors and breaks the walls separating them from the actors’ world. Through practice-led research, the researcher conducted a workshop session that led to a live interactive theatre production. While the significant reference of this study is Dorothy Heathcote’s Mantle of the Expert, Piaget and Dewey’s concept of active learning was utilised to observe and analyse the research findings. This research indicates that interactive theatre activities successfully turn passive children into active participants. By getting the children involved in this performance, they shared the stage setting, became characters in the performance, and had the opportunity to change the direction of the play. As they immersed themselves in the performance, they unconsciously explored their ability to improvise the situation and articulate their opinion critically and creatively.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdul Said Ambotang, Baharom Mohamad, Mohd Yusof Abdullah, Mohd Suhaimi Taat, and Roslee Talip. 2014. “Faktor Penyumbang Terhadap Pencapaian Sifar Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah Di Sarawak.” Sains Humanika 2 (4): 191–196. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.487
Aitken, Viv, Deborah Fraser, and Graham Price. 2007. “Negotiating the Spaces: Relational Pedagogy and Power in Drama Teaching.” International Journal of Education and the Arts 8 (14): 1–19.
Aitken, Viv. 2013. “Dorothy Heathcote’s Mantle of the Expert Approach to Teaching and Learning: A Brief Introduction.” In Connecting Curriculum, Linking Learning. NZCER Press.
Biddle, Catharine and Amy Price Azano. 2016. “Constructing and Reconstructing the ‘Rural School Problem’: A Century of Rural Education Research.” Review of Research in Education 40 (1): 298–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16667700
Farmer, David. 2011. Learning through Drama in the Primary Years. Drama Resource.
Five Arts Centre Sdn Bhd. 2017. “Theatre-in-Education Programme, Young Theatre Penang and Five Arts Centre, Penang (1998–1999).” Arts Education Archive Malaysia. Accessed 20 April 2023. https://myartseducationarchive.com/selected-programs/theatre-in-education/
Haneem S., Marlenny Deenerwan, Mariani Md Nor and Nor Shuradi N. H. (2022). “He took off my pants! The implementation of creative drama in a sex education module.” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 27 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2021.1962268
Homan, Sidney. 2014. “Introduction: ‘What Have You Learned Today?’.” Comparative Drama 48 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2014.0008
Lefa, Baken. 2014. “The Piaget Theory of Cognitive Development: An Educational Implications.” Educational Psychology 1(1): 1–8.
Loy Chee Luen, Nordin Mamat, Nor Mashitah Mohd Radzi and Sopia Md Yassin. 2017. “Observation Instrument to Evaluate Early Childhood Educator’s Teaching Strategies using Creative Arts.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7 (4): 870–880. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2898
Pardjono. 2002. “Active Learning, The Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Constructivist Theory Perspectives.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 9 (3): 163–178.
Robson, Sarah. 2018. “What is Theatre in Education and Five Reasons How It Supports Organisations to Inspire Positive Change.” Gibber. Accessed 19 April 2023. https://www.wearegibber.com/blog/what-is-theatre-in-education/
Sawney, Fiona. 2003. It Opened My Eyes. Using Theatre in Education to Deliver Sex and Relationship Education: A Good Practice Guide. Health Development Agency.
Thambu, Nadarajan, Mohamad Khairi Haji Othman and Noor Banu Mahadir Naidu. 2020. “Using Forum Theatre to Develop Various Levels of Thinking Skills among Moral Education Students in Secondary School.” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction 17 (2): 167–194. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.6
Thambu, Nadarajan. 2019. Potential of Forum Theatre in Forming A Holistic Human Being: Qualitative Findings from Moral Education Class [Potensi Unsur-Unsur Teater Forum dalam Pembentukan Insan Menyeluruh: Dapatan Kajian Kualitatif Kelas Pendidikan Moral]. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3(1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/07
Thompson, James and Richard Schechner. 2004. “Why ‘Social Theatre’?” The Drama Review 48 (3): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054204041667767
Weir, Susan, Darina Errity and Laura McAvinue. 2015. “Factors Associated with Educational Disadvantage in Rural and Urban Areas.” The Irish Journal of Education/Iris Eireannach an Oideachais 40: 94–110. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24582832