Analysis of the Visual Similarities and Differences Between the Character of Hikayat Seri Rama (Malaysia) and Ramakien (Thailand) Called Hanuman for the Creation of Digital Artworks
Main Article Content
Abstract
Hanuman’s portrayal in Hikayat Seri Rama and Ramakien extends beyond physical characteristics to include symbolic meaning and narrative significance. This research systematically examines the visual similarities and differences between Hanuman in these two epics. The methodology follows a five-step process adapted from Newbold (2015) to analyse digital representations of Southeast Asian folklore characters. Four images of Hanuman’s shadow puppet were selected for detailed visual analysis. The study identifies three primary comparative dimensions: visual appearance, lines and shapes, and the colour and symbolic elements of costumes. In Ramakien, Hanuman is depicted with white fur, elaborate golden armour, and a crown, symbolising purity, strength, and heroism in Thai culture. In contrast, Hikayat Seri Rama presents Hanuman in simpler attire, emphasising cunning and agility, and reflecting Malay artistic conventions as well as Islamic and local cultural influences. This analysis highlights the distinctiveness and interconnectedness of Southeast Asian folklore and demonstrates an approach for integrating traditional narratives into digital media, thereby fostering regional cultural expression through folktales.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aveling, H. 2012. “‘Sita Puts Out the Fire’: Some Depictions of the Testing of Sita’s Virtue in Indonesian, Malay, and Thai Literature.” Kritika Kultura 18: 25–43. https://doi.org/10.13185/KK2012.01802
Azim, S. 2022. “The Power of Digital Storytelling: How Technology Navigated Folklores During the Pandemic.” Global Media Journal: Indian Edition 14(1): 1–33.
Balakrishnan, P., M. L. Abdul Rahman, and J. Harun. 2020. “Crime Lead to War in Ramayana and Hikayat Seri Rama.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10(1): 196–208. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i1/6837
Chattopadhyay, A., and M. K. Das. 2022. “When Folk Meets Digital: A Study of Purulia Chhau and the Mediatization of Religion.” Global Media Journal: Indian Edition 14(1): 1–25.
Chaudhury, S. R. 2024. “‘Laugh Like Surpanakha’: Modern Literary Re-imagining of a Famous Villainess in Indian Folkloric Traditions.” Cultural Analysis 22(1): 52–72.
Dawson, D. B. 2024. “Embodiment and Meaning: Muay Thai in Different Cultural Contexts.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Anthropological Society 48(1): Article 4. https://doi.org/10.56702/MPMC7908/saspro4801.4
Dilfa, N. K. 2021. “Locating the Tradition of Mappila Ramayana in a Context of Cultural Grafting.” Language in India 21(7): 271–281.
Fukuoka, M. 2022. Ramayana Theater in Contemporary Southeast Asia. 1st ed. Jenny Stanford Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003290957-1
Ghosh, B., R. Singh, and M. Sawant. 2024. “Digital Technology: A Step to Protect Cave Art of Indian Subcontinent as National Heritage—a Review.” Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture 53(1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2023-0047
Hidajat, R., Pujiyanto, Hartono, M. A. Hasyimy, S. Wulandari, and N. Ramadani. 2021. “The Aesthetics of the Hanoman Character in the Performing Aparts of the Indonesia-Thailand Ramayana Stories.” KnE Social Sciences 5(6): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i6.9189
Khalis, F. M., and N. Mustaffa. 2017. “Cultural Inspirations towards Malaysian Animation Character Design.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 33: 487–501. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2017-3301-32
Kia, K. K. 2014. “Digital Puppetry of Wayang Kulit Kelantan: A Study of Its Visual Aesthetics.” PhD diss., Cultural Center University of Malaya. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Kong, L., X. Guo, and Y. Liu. 2024. “The Impact of Digital Media, Virtual Reality, and Computer-generated Art on Traditional Art Forms.” SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418301004
Kuroda, K. 2020. “Folk Dance-dramas as Hybrid Culture in the Thai-Malay Border Region: Nora, Makyung, and Mek Melung.” PhD diss., Kansai Gaidai University.
Lim, S. L. 2010. “Transmitting the Ramayana Epic from India to Southeast Asia and the West through Shadow Puppetry and Visual Art.” Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Mesangrutdharakul, W. 2016. “The Tamil’s Ramayana at Batu Cave, Malaysia. A Comparative Case Study of Thai Ramayana and Valmiki’s Ramayana.” Review of Integrative Business Economy Research 5: 100–106.
Newbold, C. 2015. “How to Do a Visual Analysis (A Five-Step Process).” The Visual Communication Guy. https://thevisualcommunicationguy.com/2015/01/12/how-to-do-a-visual-analysis-a-five-step-process/
Putrawan, I. N. A. 2023. “The Value of Religious Moderation in the Ramayana Epic.” International Conference on Hindu Studies 1(1): 1–15.
Rajantheran, M., K. Maniam, S. S. Kandasamy, and S. J. I. Samuel. 2019. “Hikayat Seri Rama: Establishing the Source.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 7(6): 347–359.
Singh, R. 2015. “Cross-cultural Narratives: The Ramayana in Malaysia and Thailand.” Southeast Asian Arts Journal 18(1): 34–49.
Suaib, N. M., N. A. F. Ismail, S. Sadimon, and Z. Mohd Yunos. 2020. “Cultural Heritage Preservation Efforts in Malaysia: A Survey.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 979: 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/979/1/012008
Swain, M. J., and D. H. Ballard. 1991. “Color Indexing.” International Journal of Computer Vision 7(1): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130487