REGULATION, INCENTIVES AND GOVERNMENT POLICY: HOW DOES IT STIMULATE R&D ENGINEERS' INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOURS IN MALAYSIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY SMEs?
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study seeks to examine the relationship between regulation, incentives and government policy to R&D (research and development) engineers' innovative behaviour in Malaysia biotechnology SMEs. This research is empirical study where survey data was drawn from 218 R&D engineers in biotechnology SMEs in Malaysia. The data were analysed using SmartPLS which is Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) tool. The result unfolds that government policy is positively and significantly associated with innovative behaviour. Nevertheless, regulation was found significant to innovative behaviour but demonstrates negative magnitude. On the other hand, incentives was insignificant to innovative behaviour. This in turn suggests that government policy is critical to foster innovative behaviour whereby the regulation enforcement that indicates disequilibrium possess by higher compliance cost be a disincentive for the R&D engineers to act innovatively. Contradict to previous studies, the insignificant relationship between incentives and individual innovative behaviour, possibly influence by lack of coordination, monitoring and vetting system with regards to the incentives distribution.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Agarwal., U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. & Howitt, P. (2005), Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701
Ahn, J. M. and York, A. S. (2011). Resource-based and institution-based approaches to biotechnology industry development in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 257–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9147-2
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S. & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Antoncic, B. (2007). Intrapreneurship: A comparative structural equation modeling study, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), 309–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570710734244
Atkinson, R. D. & Ezell, S. J. (2012). Innovation economics: The race for global advantage. Yale Press.
Awang, A. H., Sapie, N. M., Hussain, M. H., Ishak, S. & Md Yusof, R. (2014). Organizational learning and work environment: A formation of innovative work behavior at small medium enterprises (SMEs). Proceeding of The 11th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, 30–38.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least square (PLS) approach to causal modeling, personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issues on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285–324.
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
Bessen, J. & Hunt, R. M. (2007). An empirical look at software patents. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 157–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00136.x
Bessen, J. & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Do patents perform like property? Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 8–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2008.34587991
Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Blind, K. (2012). The influence of regulation on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy, 41, 391–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.008
Bysted, R. & Hansen, J. R. (2015). Comparing public and private sector employees' innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841977
Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi trait multi method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Carlin, W. & David, S. (2006). Macroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions and Policies. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Carlsson, B. & Stankiewicz, R. (1995). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, in Carlsson, B. (ed.) Technological systems and economic performance: the case of factory automation, Boston, Dordrecht and London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 21–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0145-5_2
Chin, W. W. (1998).The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Colombo, M. G., D'adda, D. & Piva, E. (2010). The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 113–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9111-9
Colombo, M. G., Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Dynamics of science-based entrepreneurship, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9114-6
De Jong, J. P. J. & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative Work Behavior: Measurement and Validation, Research Report of Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Deak, C. & Peredy, Z. (2015). Policy framework conditions to foster “system innovation” with some illustration from an international perspective. Journal of Innovation Management, 14–24.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Neumayer, E. & Perkins, A. (2015). Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology: Evidence from automobile patents. Research Policy, 44(1), 244–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.017
Dhar, R. L. (2015). The effects of high performance human resource practices on service innovative behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.002
EPU. (2008). 7th Malaysia Plan. Retrieved July 20, 2012 from www.epu.gov.my/.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fiske, D. W. (1982). Convergent–discriminant validation in measurements and research strategies. In D. Brinbirg & L. H. Kidder (Eds.), Forms of validity in research (pp. 77–92).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Guan, J. C. & Yam, R. C. M. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms' innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.001
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 283–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_4
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A. (2013). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1–328.
Hall, L. A. & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2002). A study of R&D, innovation and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4), 231–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5
Holtz-Eakin, D. (2000). Public policy towards entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 15(4), 283–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011153921409
Huang, X., Schroder, B. & Steffens, P. (1999). The Chinese steel industry in transition: Industry perspective on innovation policy. R&D Management, 29(1), 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00113
Jaffe, A. B. & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perception of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.238
Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25823
Kang, K. N. & Lee, Y. S. (2008). What Affects The Innovation Performance in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in The Biotechnology Industry? An Empirical Study on Korean Biotech SMEs. Biotechnology Letters, 30(10), 1699–1704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9745-y.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Straw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
Kemp, R. & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments. Ecological Economics, 72, 28–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
Kolvereid, L. & Obloj, K. (1994). Entrepreneurship in emerging versus mature economies: An exploratory survey. International Small Business Journal, 12(4), 14–27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242694124001
Kosters, S. (2010). Subsidizing start-ups: Policy targeting and policy effectiveness. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10(3), 199–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10842-010-0083-0
Lach, S. (2002). Existence and persistence of price dispersion: An empirical analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 433–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8737
Lohmöller, J. B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4
Lu, Y., Tsang, E. W. K. & Peng, M. W. (2008). Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific: Toward an institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 361–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9100-9
Malmberg, A. & Power, D. ( 2005). How do firms in clusters create knowledge, Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 409–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662710500381583
Massa, S. & Testa, S. (2008). Innovation and SMEs: Misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers. Technovation, 28, 393–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.002
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Odoardi, C., Montani, F., Boudrias, J-S & Battistelli, A. (2015). Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior: The role of group and psychological processes, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 545–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0131
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L. & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: NY. Haper and Row Publishers Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12, 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-120710-100452
Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue: Fundamental Research Issues in Strategy and Economics), 95–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
Porter, M. & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environmentcompetitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rahim, R. A., Salleh, N. F., Ahmad, S. F. S. & Mustapha, R. M. R. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership style, knowledge management practices, and innovative behavior. Proceedings of the Colloquium on Administrative Science and Technology, 499–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-45-3_48
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M. & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001
Ren, F. & Zhang, J. (2015). Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees' innovative behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.992659
Ringle, C M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) beta. http://www.smartpls. de. Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., Shanock, L., Scott, C. W. & Shuffler, M. (2010). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 49, 149–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20339
Romijin, A. & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in Southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053–1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
Santarelli, E. & Vivarelli, M. (2002), Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 39–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.1.39
Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Theory of economic development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.F
Scott, J. (2000). Rational choice theory. In G. Browning, A. Halcli & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. London: Sage
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed.
Scott, A. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: Geography and the creative field revisited. Small Business Economics, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-6493-9
Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinates of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 137, 580–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256701
Sharif, N. (2012). Facilitating and promoting innovative entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: Theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(2), 139–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.230
Shu. C., Zhou, K. Z., Xiao, Y. & Gao, S. (2014). How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–15. SMECorp, (2014). New SME Definition. Retrieved July 4, 2014 from http://www.smecorp.gov.my/vn2/.
Spector, P. E. & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables, Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 287–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428110369842
Ta?tan, S. B. & Davoudi, S. M. M. (2015). An examination of the relationship between leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior with the moderating role of trust in leader: A study in the turkish context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 23–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.862
Tolbert, P. S. & Zucker, L. G. (1985). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 22–39.
Trippl, M. & Tödtling F. (2008). From the ivory tower to the market place: Knowledge organizations in the development of biotechnology clusters. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 38(2), 159–175.
Trott, P. (2012). Innovation management and new product development (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H. & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008
Wang, C. (2013). Can institutions explain cross country differences in innovative activity? Journal of Macroeconomics, 37, 128–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.05.009
Welter, F. & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x
West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 3–13).
Wright, B. W., Pardey, P. G., Nottenburg, C. & Koo, B. (2007). Agricultural innovation: investments and Incentives, Chapter in Evenson, R. E. and Pingali, P. eds. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 3.
Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y. & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2011). Utilitarianism or romanticism: The effect of rewards on employees' innovative behaviour, International Journal of Manpower, 32(1), 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437721111121242