THE FORMALISATION OF SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT IN THE MEDICAL RELIEF NGO: THE EVIDENCE OF MERCY MALAYSIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social engagement involves the participation of a group people in undertaking collective activities in social community. The paper aims to examine the formalisation of NGO social engagement to their stakeholders. The MERCY's social engagement is not only focusing on the traditional forms of reports i.e. social reports to the stakeholders but includes the forms of actions including conversation, behavioural explanations and reasonable conduct through negotiation of performance and impact among stakeholders. The social engagement paradigm emphasises on the rights and contracts between two parties (i.e. Accountor and Accountee). The qualitative research is employed by undertaking empirical case study research for MERCY, an international disaster relief NGO that highlight an understanding of social engagement through the power of negotiation. The data are gathered through indepth series of interviews and documentary reviews, which was analysed through thematic analysis. The findings revelas the social "closeness" within the community can be seen from the moral values imperatives that had driven by the trustworthiness and willingness of the people in the community to engage in the volunteering work.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdul Rahim, A. R., & Goddard, A. (1998). An interpretive inquiry of accounting practices in religious organisations. Financial Accountability and Management 14(3), 183–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00060
An-Na'im, A. (2002). Religion and global civil society: inherent incompatibility or synergy and interdependence. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. K. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 55–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashton, R. H., & Ashton, A. H. (1995). Personalities on judgement and decision making: research in accounting and auditing. In R. H. Ashton, & A. H. Ashton (Eds.), Management and decision making research; accounting and auditing (pp. 3–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720420.003
Assad, M. J., & Goddard, A. R. (2010). Stakeholder salient and accounting practices in Tanzanian NGOs. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(3), 276–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513551011032482
Atack, I. (1999). Four criteria of developing NGO legitimacy. World Development, 27(5), 855–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00033-9
Awio, G., Northcott, D., & Lawrence, S. (2011). Social capital and accountability in grassroots NGOs. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(1), 63–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513571111098063
Belal, A. R., Cooper, S. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2013). Vulnerable and explitable: the need for organisational accountability and transparent in emerging and less developed economies. Accounting Forum, 37, 81–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.001
Bendell, J. (2000). Introduction: working with stakeholder pressure for sustainable development In J. Bendell (Ed.), Terms of Endearment. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing/New Academy Business. http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-907643-14-9_2
Blader, S. L., & Rothman, N. B. (2014). Paving the road to preferential treatment with good intentions: Empathy, accountability and fairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.001
Bryman, A. (1989). Research Methods and Organisation Studies. Hemel Hempstead: Unwin Hyman. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203359648
Buhr, N. (2001). Corporate Silence: environmental disclosure and the North American free trade agreement. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 405–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0434
Burgess, R. (1984). In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. Hemel Hempstead: Allen and Unwin. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203418161
Connolly, C., & Kelly, M. (2011). Understanding accountability in social enterprise organisations: a framework. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 224–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17508611111182386
Edwards, M., & Fowler, A. (2002). Intoduction: changing challenges for NGDO management. In M. Edwards, & A. Fowlwe (Eds.), The Earthscan Reader on NGO Management. London: Earthscan.
Fernando, J. L., & Heston, A. W. (1997). Introduction: NGOs between states, markets, and civil society. In J. L. Fernando & A. W. Heston (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social science (Vol. 554, pp. 8–20). Philadelphia: Sage Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716297554001001
Fisher, J. (1998). Nongovernments: NGOs and the Political Development of the Third World. Hartford Kumarian Fry, R. E. (1995). Accountability in organisational life: problems or opportunity for nonprofits? Non-profit Management and Leadership, 6(2), 181–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060207
Gelfand, M. J., Lim, B. C., & Raver, J. L. (2004). Culture and accountability in organisations: Variations in forms of social control across cultures. Human Resources Management Review, 14, 135–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.007
Gray, R., Bebbington, J., & Collison, D. (2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(3), 319–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570610670325
Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D. L., Evans, R., & Zadek, S. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(3), 325–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579710178106
Gray, R., Owen, D. L., & Adams, C. A. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.
HAP International. (2008). The guide to the HAP standard: Humanitarian accountability and quality management. Oxford: Oxfam GB. http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/9780855987619
Hardy, L., & Ballis, H. (2013). Accountability and giving accounts - In reporting practices in a religious corporation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(4), 539–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513571311327453
Hasan, B., & Siti Nabihah, A. K. (2012). Examining accounting and accountability issues in religious context: insights from literature. Aceh International Journaal of Social Science, 1(1), 24–31.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (2000). Political responsibility in transnational NGO advocacy. World Development, 28(12), 2051–2065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00078-4
Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (2007). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. London: Earthscan.
Katz, H., & Anheier, H. (2006). Global correctedness: The structure of transnational NGO networks. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2005/2006 (pp. 240–265). London: Sage Publication Ltd.
Lehman, G. (1995). A legitimate concern for environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1995(6), 393–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1995.1037
Lehman, G. (1999). Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 217–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00044-0
Lehman, G. (2007). The accountability of NGOs in civil society and its public spheres. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18, 645–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.04.002
Lehman, G. (2013). Moral will, accounting and the phronemos Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2 July 2013, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.10.004
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.
Mohamad, M. (2008). Religion, human rights and constitutional contract politics in Malaysia. Intellectual Discourse, 16(2), 155–186.
Munro, R. (1996a). Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing London: International Thomson Business Press.
Munro, R. (1996b). Alignment and identity work: The study of accounts and accountability. In R. Munro, & J. Mouritsen (Eds.), Accountability: Power, ethos and technologies of managing (pp. 1–20). London: International Thomson Business Press.
Najwa, M. (2012). Self-accountability: The link between self-accountability and accountability in Islam. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 240–245.
O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 446–471.
O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1–24, http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.002.
O'Dwyer, B. (2008). Qualitative data analysis:illuminating a process for transforming a 'messy' but 'attractive' nuisance. In C. Humprey, & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research (Vol. Paperback edition). London: CIMA Publishing.
Parker, L. D. (2011). Building bridges to the future: mapping the territory for developing social and environmental accountability. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 7–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2011.556389
Princen, T., & Finger, M. (1994). Environmental NGOs in world politics: Linking the local and the global. London: New York Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203429037
Prohaska, T., Anderson, L., & Binstock, R. (2012). Public health for an aging society: JHU Press.
Raar, J. (2009). The new global accounting community: Rationale for dialogue to establish its accountability? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 509–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.001
Rahman, M., & Hussain, M. (2012). Social business, accountability and performance reporting Humanomics, 28(2), 118–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08288661211228889
Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs and international environmental institutions. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 719–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00064
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The law of the peoples: The idea of public reason revisited. Cambridge Harvard Business Press.
Roy, S. (2014). The transformation of Islamist NGOs in Palestine. Retrieved January 30, 2016 from http://www.merip.org/mer/mer214/transformation-islamist-ngospalestine.
Schweiker, W. (1993). Accounting for ourselves: Accounting practice and the discourse of ethics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(2/3), 231–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90035-5
Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 541–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00036-8
Simms, A. (2000). Paradigm lost: Critical voices on globalisation and the big hole in finances for development. London: New Economics Foundations.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study. California, US: Sage Publications.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.