Multi-Attribute Utility Theory for Selecting an Appropriate Procurement Method in the Construction Projects
Main Article Content
Abstract
The selection of an appropriate procurement method is becoming an increasingly important issue due to complex decision making that clients are facing early in the lifecycle of construction projects. The aim of this paper is to improve the procurement system in the construction industry by developing a model using the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) as a decision support system for the selection of an appropriate procurement method for construction projects in the Gaza Strip. Factors that influence the selection of an appropriate method for construction projects in the Gaza Strip are identified and the results indicate that the most significant six factors influencing the selection of procurement methods in the Gaza Strip construction projects are price competition, degree of project complexity, time constraints of the project, project size, client financial capability and client experience in procurement methods. The study concludes that there is no variety of procurement methods used in the Gaza Strip construction industry, as a traditional procurement method is preferred. This is because most professionals in the Gaza Strip are not familiar or experienced with alternative procurement methods. A model was developed using the MAUT to select the most appropriate procurement method. The MAUT as a decision support system was successful in identifying the appropriate procurement method.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Cheung, S.O., Lam, T.I., Wan, Y.W. and Lam, K.C. (2001). Improving objectivity in procurement selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3): 132– 139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:3(132).
Chua, D.K.H., Kog, Y.C. and Loh, P.K. (1999). Critical success factors for different project objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(142).
Davis, P., Love, P. and Baccarini, D. (2008). Report: Building Procurement Methods. Research Project No: 2006-034-C-02. Brisbane, Australia: Icon.Net Pty. Ltd. Available at http://www.construction-innovation.info/images/pdfs/Research_library/ResearchLibraryC/2006-034-C/reports/Report_Building_Procurement_Methods.pdf.
El Wardani, M. (2004). Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects. PhD diss. The Pennsylvania State University.
Enshassi, A. and Modough, Z. (2012). Case studies in awarding the lowest bid price in construction projects. IUG Journal of Natural and Engineering Studies, 20(1): 113–137.
Fellows, R.F., Langford, D.A., Newcombe, R. and Urry, S. (1983). Construction Management in Practice. London: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Hashim, M., Chan, M.Y.L., Ng, C.Y., Ng, S.H., Shim, M.H. and Tay, L.Y. (2006). Factors influencing the selection of procurement systems by clients. Paper presented at International Conference on Construction Industry 2006. Padang, Indonesia, 21–25 June.
Hibberd, P. and Djebarni, R. (1996). Criteria of choice for procurement methods. COBRA 1996 Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). London, 19–20 September.
Larmour, J. (2011). A study of procurement routes and their use in the commercial sector. PhD diss. University of Cambridge.
Love, P.E.D., Davis, P.R., Edwards, D.J. and Baccarini, D. (2005). Uncertainty avoidance: Public sector clients and procurement selection. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7): 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810904550.
Love, P.E.D., Skitmore, R. and Earl, G. (1998). Selecting an appropriate procurement method for the construction process: An empirical study. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2): 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372501.
Luu, D.T., Thomas, S. and Chen, S.E. (2003). Parameters governing the selection of procurement system: An empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(3): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980310478458.
Mathonsi, M.D. and Thwala, W.D. (2012). Factors influencing the selection of procurement systems in the South African construction industry. African Journal of Business Management, 6(10): 3583–3594. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.978.
Masterman, J.W.E. (2002). An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems. 2nd Ed. London: E & FN Spon.
Molenaar, K., Sobin, N., Gransberg, D., Tamera McCuen, T.L., Sinem Korkmaz, S. and Horman, M. (2009). Sustainable, high performance projects and project delivery methods: A state-of-practice report. White Paper for the DesignBuild Institute of America and the Charles Pankow Foundation. Washington DC: The Charles Pankow Foundation and The Design-Build Institute of America.
Natasa, T. and Car-Puši?, D. (2008). "Design and build" in comparison with the traditional procurement method and the possibility of its application in the creation constructability. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Organization, Technology and Management in Construction. Zagreb, Croatia: Gra?evinski fakultet Sveu?ilišta u Zagrebu.
Noaum, S.G. (1994). Critical analysis of time and cost of management and traditional contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(4): 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:4(687).
Ojo, A.E. and Gbadebo, M.A. (2012). Critical selection criteria for appropriate procurement strategy for project delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), 3(5): 422–428.
Ojo, S.O. (2012). PROMA: A decision support system to determine appropriate procurement method. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(4): 316–321.
Ojo, S.O and Aina, O.O. (2010). Developing a decision support system for the selection of appropriate procurement method for a building project in Nigeria. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 10(2): 18–30.
Onosakponome, O.F., Yahya, A., Abdul Rani, N.S. and Shaikh, J.M. (2011). Cost benefit analysis of procurement systems and the performance of construction projects in East Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 2(5): 181–192.
Rameezdeen, R. and Ratnasabapathy, S. (2006). A multiple decisive factor model for construction procurement system selection. COBRA 2006 Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). London: RICS.
Rosli, A.R., Ismail, M.T., Wan Basiron, W.A., Md. Asrul, N., Wan Nordiana, W.A. and Zainab M.Z. (2006). Proceedings: Effect of Procurement Systems on the Performance of Construction. Padang, Indonesia, 21–24 June.
Sayegh, S. (2007). Factors affecting the selection of the appropriate construction management at risk contractor. Fifth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI'2007). Tampico, México: Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions (LACCEI).
Shiyamini, R. and Rameezdeen, R. (2006). Multiple decisive factor models for construction procurement system selection. Proceedings of the COBRA 2006 Conference. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Thomas, N., Luu, D.T. and Chen, S.E. (2001). Decision criteria and their subjectivity in construction procurement selection. The Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 2(1): 70–80. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v2i1.2888.
Tran, D. and Molenaar, K. (2012). Critical risk factors in project delivery method selection for highway projects. Construction Research Congress. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.034.
World Bank (2004). Country Procurement Assessment Report, West Bank and Gaza. Washington DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/13881.