Application of Hybrid Green Fences for Security in Public Building Designs in Nigeria: Lessons from Kigali, Rwanda and Abuja, Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of security has become a burning topic and major concern for urban dwellers in many developing countries. The use of active security measures is no longer considered as adequate to forestall the security breaches in many public buildings. It is commonplace in urban areas in developing countries such as Nigeria to find that these public buildings having perimeter walls of solid walls. These practices constitute environmental challenges to the urban planners and the architects who design such buildings. In the case of Kigali, there has been a significant attempt to create a blend of the environment with security walls through the design of the perimeter fences of public buildings. The advantages of these concepts have different approaches which could be adapted for different situations. This article aims to examine the nature of the hybrid fences designs in use in public buildings in Kigali with the view of suggesting advantageous ones for application to ensure environmental sustainability in Nigeria. The research method adopted is a qualitative approach using case studies of selected public buildings in Kigali and buildings in Abuja, Nigeria. The design of these fences would be examined and the different options identified. A comparative analysis would be drawn from the two cities and the areas of applications of the solutions from Kigali would be proposed. The study would conclude that the approach of hybrid green fences in Kigali offers the best advantage of security as it allows for visual contact and serves as the passive role of environmental sustainability while ensuring aesthetic value for the buildings. The article would recommend that architects incorporate the concept of hybrid green fences in the overall design of the public buildings and not as a secondary development.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anunobi, A.I., Adedayo, O.F., Ayuba, P., Oyetola, S.A. and Otijele, G.O. (2016). An assessment of ramp designs as barrier-free accesses in public buildings in Abuja, Nigeria. Centre for Human Settlements and Urban Development Journal, 6(1): 119–131.
Capital Fence and Wire Ltd. (2017). Hybrid privacy. Available at: http://capitalfence.ca/hybrid-privacy-300040004500-series/.
Dorn, M., Atlas, R., Schneider, T., Dorn, C., Nguyen, P., Satterly, S., Bentley, R. and Ellis, R. Goble, C., Bellaire, U., Wilson, R. and Billinger, M. (2014). Seven Important Building Design Features to Enhance School Safety and Security. Macon, GA: Safe Havens International Inc. Available at: https://safehavensinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Seven_Important_Building_Design_Features_to_Enhance_School_Safety_and_Security-ISSSA_2014.pdf.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2003). Site and layout design guidance. In Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks against Buildings: Providing Protection to People and Buildings. Washington DC: FEMA. Available at: https://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/20130726-1455-20490-7805/fema426_ch2.pdf.
Georgiou, M. (2006). Architectural privacy a topological approach to relational design problems. MSc diss., University College London.
HM Government (2006). Better Public Building. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Hull, S., Sehume, T., Sibiya, S., Sothafile, L. and Whittal J. (2016). Land allocation, boundary demarcation and tenure security in tribal areas of South Africa. South African Journal of Geomatics, 5(1): 68–81. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v5i1.5.
Kim, S. and Kwon, H. (2018). Urban sustainability through public architecture. Sustainability, 10(1249): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041249.
Lee, Y. (2008). "Designing with users, how?": Investigate users' involvement tactics for effective inclusive design processes. Paper presented at the International DMI Education Conference on Design Thinking: New Challenges for Designers, Managers and Organizations. Cergy-Pointoise, France, 14–15 April.
Libecap, G.D. and Lueck, D. (2011). The demarcation of land and the role of coordinating property institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 119(3): 426– 467. https://doi.org/10.1086/660842.
Meara, S.P.O. (2014). School security design: Planning to mitigate risk and avoid liability. The Construction Lawyer, 34(1): 1–9.
Mumovic, D. and Santamouris, M. (2009). A Handbook of Sustainable Building Design and Engineering: An Integrated Approach to Energy, Health and Operational Performance. London: Earthscan.
Oyetola, S.A., Adedayo, O.F., Anunobi, A.I., Adebisi, G.O. and Eri, P.O. (2015). Should public buildings be exclusive? A study of selected institutional buildings in Minna, Niger State. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 4(3): 81–87.
Raeisi, I., Nezhad, A.K. and Hafezifar, M. (2010). Architectural design principles of public spaces based on social sustainability approach: A case study in Ardabil, Iran. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 4(5): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i05/37968.
Sadeghi, G., Sani, R.M. and Wang, R. (2015). Symbolic meaning of transparency in contemporary architecture: An evaluation of recent public buildings in Famagusta. Current Urban Studies, 3(4): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2015.34030.
The Protection Engineering Group, Inc. (2011). Security Master Plan: Physical Security Design Criteria. Chantilly, VA: The Protection Engineering Group, Inc. Available at: https://docplayer.net/818255-Security-master-plan-physicalsecurity-design-criteria.html.
Wong, H. (2014). Architecture without barriers: Designing inclusive environments accessible to all. MSc diss., Ryerson University, Toronto.
Zahner Group (2017). Passive Security in Architecture: Designing for Security without Sacrificing Beauty. Kansas City, MO: A. Zahner Company. Available at: https://www.azahner.com/blog/passive-security-in-architecture.
Zhang, Y. and Yu, J. (2013). A study on the building of urban public security management network platform. Procedia Engineering, 52: 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.194.