Investigation of Issues in Structural Flood Management Measures in Sri Lank
Main Article Content
Abstract
Floods can be identified as one of the devastating natural phenomena, which resulted in a considerable amount of social, economic and environmental impacts. Sri Lanka is a country that is highly vulnerable to floods due to its unique geographical location and topography. Many flood management measures, which mainly include structural and nonstructural have implemented to reduce the impact of floods. Among them, structural measures play a vital role in flood management. However, the failures in achieving the expected performance of these existing structural measures urge the need to identify issues with them and overcome those issues to enhance the flood management process in Sri Lanka. Hence, this study focused to investigate the issues related to structural flood management measures in Sri Lanka to bridge this knowledge gap. Initially, a literature review was conducted to gain a theoretical understanding of the research area. The research approach was qualitative, which was followed by two in-depth case studies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 industry experts to gather data. Collected data were analysed via content analysis. Empirical research findings revealed that structural measures play a prominent role in flood management. However, significant issues such as ageing of structural measures, leakages, construction faults, inadequate capacity, blocking of water flow and possibility of collapsing were identified in these existing structural flood management measures, which negatively impact the effectiveness of the overall flood management process within the country. The findings of this study will lead to gain a proper understanding of gaps and weaknesses in structural flood management measures in Sri Lanka and would influence the policymakers and other respective practitioners in disaster management to enhance structural flood management by using their novel ideas and concepts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adekola, O. and Lamond, J. (2017). A media framing analysis of urban flooding in Nigeria: Current narratives and implications for policy. Regional Environmental Change, 18: 1145–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1253-y.
Aerts, J.C.J.H. (2018). A review of cost estimates for flood adaptation. Water, 10(11): 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111646.
Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (2019). Disaster Risk Reduction in Sri Lanka. Bangkok: Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D. and Li, Z. (2008). Using a protocol template for case study planning. In G. Visaggio, M.T. Baldassarre, S. Linkman and M. Turner (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'08). Swindon, UK: BCS Learning & Development Ltd., 41–48.
Bridges, D. (2014). Ethics, power and intellectual virtue: Doing right in a diversified educational research environment. In A. Reid, E. Hart and M. Peters (eds.), A Companion to Research in Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_62.
CCI (Chamber of Construction Industry) (2017). Seminar on Flood Control and Disaster Responsiveness in Proposed Western Megapolis. Colombo: CCI.
Cho, J.Y. and Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32): 1–20. Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss32/2?utm_source=nsuworks.nova.edu%2Ftqr%2Fvol19%2Fiss32%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). An introduction to mixed methods research. Available at: https://sbsrc.unl.edu/IntroductiontoMixedMethods.pdf.
Emberga, T. (2014). An assessment of causes and effects of flood in Nigeria. Standard Scientific Research and Essays, 2(7): 307–315.
Faulkner, S.L. and Trotter, S.P. (2017). Data saturation. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0060.
Heidari, A. (2009). Structural master plan of flood mitigation measures. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(1): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-61-2009.
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2013). Data Collection Survey on Disaster Management Program in Sri Lanka. Tokyo: JICA.
Kang, S., Lee, S. and Lee, K. (2018). A study on the implementation of non-structural measures to reduce urban flood damage: Focused on the survey results of the experts. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 8(2): 385– 392. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.8.385.
Kulatunga, U., Amaratunga, D. and Haigh, R.P. (2007). Structuring the unstructured data: The use of content analysis. Paper presented at the 7th International Postgraduate Conference in the Built and Human Environment. Salford Quays, UK, 28–29 March.
Lewis, S.C., Zamith, R. and Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57(1): 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761702.
Ministry of Disaster Management (2017). Sri Lanka Rapid Post Disaster Needs Assessment: Floods and Landslides. Colombo: Ministry of Disaster Management.
Mudalige, J. (2011). Comparison study of existing flood management system in Japan and Sri Lanka. Available at: https://www.adrc.asia/aboutus/vrdata/finalpresentation/janaki2011_fr.pdf.
Murray, A. (2017). Natural Flood Management: Adopting Ecosystem Approaches to Managing Flood Risk. Dublin: Friends of the Earth. Available at: https://www.foe.ie/assets/files/pdf/natural_flood_management_a_study_for_friends_of_the_earth_february_2017.pdf.
Myers, M.F. and White, G.F. (2010). The challenge of the Mississippi flood. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 35(10): 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1993.9929131.
Noshin, S., Alam, M., Sadiq, S. and Mandokhail, S.J. (2018). Stability analysis of flood bunds: A study on geotechnical health evaluation of embankments. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 414: 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012035.
Palliyaguru, R. and Amaratunga, D. (2008). Managing disaster risks through quality infrastructure and vice versa. Structural Survey, 26(5): 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800810922766.
Salvesen, D. (2010). Structural approaches to flood and coastal hazard mitigation: Assessing structural approaches. Course title: Breaking the disaster cycle; Future directions in natural hazard mitigation, Session no. 6. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=471126%0A.
Saunders, M., Lewes, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009) Research Methods for Business Students. 5th Ed. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersely (PVT) Ltd.
Shah, A.A., Ye, J., Abid, M. and Ullah, R. (2017). Determinants of flood risk mitigation strategies at household level: A case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 88: 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2872-9.
Shah, A.A., Ye, J., Shaw, R., Ullah, R. and Ali, M. (2020). Factors affecting floodinduced household vulnerability and health risks in Pakistan: The case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42: 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101341.
Sivakumar, S.S. (2016). Flood mitigation strategies adopted in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(2): 602–611.
Smith, M.E., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2012). Management Research: An Introduction. 4th Ed. London: SAGE Publication Ltd. Available at: https://books.google.lk/books?id=EczlVa2192gC&pg=PA13&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q=philosophy&f=false.
Tingsanchali, T. (2012). Urban flood disaster management. Procedia Engineering, 32: 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1233.
Velasco, M., Russo, B., Cabello, R.A., Sunyer, D. and Malgrat, P. (2016). Assessment of the effectiveness of structural and nonstructural measures to cope with global change impacts in Barcelona. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(1): S55–S68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12247.
Wagenaar, D.J., Dahm, R.J., Diermanse, F.L.M., Dias, W.P.S., Dissanayake, D.M.S.S., Vajja, H.P., Gehrels, J.C. and Bouwer, L.M. (2019). Evaluating adaptation measures for reducing flood risk: A case study in the city of Colombo, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 37: 101–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101162.
Wanninayake, S.B. and Rajapakshe, P.S. (2018). Increasing trend of flood and landslide disasters in Sri Lanka: Socio-economic perspective. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Sri Lanka Forum of University Economists, 2017. Mihintale, Sri lanka: Sri Lanka Forum of University Economists, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, 107–110.
White, M.D. and Marsh, E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1): 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053.
Wickramaratne, S., Ruwanpura, J., Ranasinghe, U., Walawe?Durage, S., Adikariwattage, V. and Wirasinghe, S.C. (2012). Ranking of natural disasters in Sri Lanka for mitigation planning. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 3(2): 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901211245198.
Yin, R.K. (2015). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. 2nd Ed. New York/London: The Guilford Press.