Exploring the Temporary Appropriation of Marginal Open Spaces in Urban Residential Neighbourhoods

Main Article Content

Temitope Muyiwa Adebara

Abstract

Open spaces are essential to the liveability of urban residential neighbourhoods. While formal open spaces, including neighbourhood parks, have been extensively studied for their environmental and social values, there is scanty research on marginal open spaces’ potential uses and benefits. By drawing on an empirical study of residential neighbourhoods in a Nigerian urban centre, this study explores the temporary appropriation of marginal open spaces. The study adopts a mixed-method approach using a questionnaire survey, photographic recordings, observations, open space measurements and interviews with local planning authorities. Findings showed that marginal spaces exist in various types and forms, including open areas along neighbourhood streets and stream corridors. The three major types of temporary appropriation in the residential neighbourhoods were “Informal commerce”, “Leisure/social pursuit” and “Sacralisation (religious activity)”. The most critical concerns regarding open space appropriation, measured on a five-point Likert scale, were “Lack of safety”, “Absence of tree cover/shade” and “Stench from uncollected waste”, with scales of 4.92, 4.68 and 4.42, respectively. Information gathered from the local planning authorities also showed that the users violated the planning regulations guiding the marginal spaces. The study concluded that although the temporary use of open spaces in residential neighbourhoods is essential for improving the residents’ livelihoods and socio-cultural lives, the practice is fraught with several challenges. Consequently, practical policy recommendations were proffered to ensure that marginal spaces are produced as desirable areas for everyday life while maintaining hygiene, safety, cleanliness and comfort.

Article Details

How to Cite
Temitope Muyiwa Adebara. 2024. “Exploring the Temporary Appropriation of Marginal Open Spaces in Urban Residential Neighbourhoods”. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries 29 (1): 47-65. https://doi.org/10.21315/.
Section
Articles

References

Addas, A.N. (2015). Motivation and attachment in the use of public open spaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PhD diss. University of Sheffield.

Adebara, T.M. (2022). Private open space as a reflection of culture: The example of traditional courtyard houses in Nigeria. Open House International, 48(3): 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-06-2022-0152

. (2019). Front and rear yards of residential buildings as open spaces in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: Some implications for development control. In L.K. Abidoye,

O.B. Okedere, K.O. Alawode, R.B. Ibrahim, A.U. Adebanjo, M.O. Thanni,

K.A. Adeyemo (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering and Environmental Sciences. Osun State, Nigeria: Osun State University, 762–789.

. (2017). Physical planning implications of open space utilization in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Master’s thesis. Obafemi Awolowo University.

Adebara, T.M., Adebara, O.B. and Badiora, A.I. (2022). Informal use of “marginal open space” along residential streets in a Nigerian city. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 6(2): 207–215. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n2-7

Adebara, T.M., Adebara, O.B. and Taiwo, A.O. (2023). The use or misuse of urban streets? Exploration of everyday urbanism in traditional city centres. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 17(1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v17n1.235

Adedeji, J.A. and Fadamiro, J.A. (2015). Urban open space transition and management in Lagos, Nigeria. Management of Environmental Quality, 26(6): 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2013-0051

Afon, O.A. and Adebara, T.M. (2022). Socio-cultural utilization of open spaces in the traditional residential neighbourhood of Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Space and Culture, 25(1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331219874698

Al-Hagla, K. (2008). Towards a sustainable neighbourhood: The role of open spaces.

International Journal of Architectural Research, 2: 162–177.

Basorun, J.O. and Ayeni, D.A. (2013). Planning and restoration of environmental values in Nigeria dysfunctional societies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(4): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2013.v2n4p185

Batréau, Q. and Bonnet, F. (2016). Managed informality: Regulating street vendors in Bangkok. City and Community, 15(1): 29–43.

Blanco, J., Bosoer, L. and Apaolaza, R. (2014). Movilidad, apropiación y uso del territorio: una aproximación a partir del caso de Buenos Aires. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales, 18.

Cohen, D.A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., Lapham, S., Evenson, K.R., Ward, P., Hillier, A. and McKenzie, T.L. (2013). Use of neighbourhood parks: Does socio-economic status matter? A four-city study. Public Health, 127(4): 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.003

Cohen, D.A., Williamson, S. and Han, B. (2021). Gender differences in physical activity associated with urban neighbourhood parks: Findings from the national study of neighbourhood parks. Women’s Health Issues, 31(3): 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.11.007

Daramola, O. (2017). Polluting till death and beyond: A perception study of the disposal of the dead in a traditional African city. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(3): 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2015-0133

Devlin, R.T. (2015). Street vending and the politics of space in New York City. In

K. Graaff and N. Ha (eds.), Street Vending in the Neoliberal City: A Global Perspective on the Practices and Politics of a Marginalized Economy. New York: Berghahn Books, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2015-0133

Douglas, O., Russell, P. and Scott, M. (2019). Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: Implications for urban planning across the city region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4): 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1439573

Fonseca-Rodriguez, J.M. (2015). The importance and appropriation of public spaces

in cities. Paakat: Magazine of Technology and Society, 4(7).

Garde, A.M. (1999). Marginal spaces in the urban landscape: Regulated margins or incidental open spaces? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(3): 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901800302

Gedikli, B. (2010). The open space contributing to neighbourhood sustainability through public events: A case from Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http//www.livablecities.org [Accessed on 6 December 2017].

Gehl, J. (2011). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington/Covelo/ London: Island Press.

Girma, Y., Terefe, H. and Pauleit, S. (2019). Urban green spaces use and management in rapidly urbanizing countries: The case of emerging towns of Oromia special zone surrounding Finfinnee, Ethiopia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 43: 126357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.019

Graumann, C.F. (1976). The concept of appropriation (aneignung) and modes of appropriation of space. Available at: http://iaps.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?iaps_00_1976_009

Josey, B.C. and Ramirez-Lovering, D. (2020). (Temporary) appropriation (of space), Makassar and Urban kampung. In A. Melis, J. Lara-Hernandez and J. Thompson (eds.), Temporary Appropriation in Cities. Cham: Springer, 171–193 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32120-8_11

Karuppannan, S. and Sivam, A. (2013). Comparative analysis of utilisation of open space at neighbourhood level in three Asian cities: Singapore, Delhi and Kuala Lumpur. Urban Design International, 18: 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.34

Kerishnana, P.B., Maruthaveeran, S. and Maulan, S. (2020). Investigating the usability pattern and constraints of pocket parks in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 50: 126647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126647

Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1976). Appropriation of space. In Proceedings of 3rd International Architectural Psychology Conference. Strasbourg: Louis Pasteur University, 65–86.

Lara-Hernandez, J.A., Melis, A. and Caputo, S. (2017). Understanding spatial configuration and temporary appropriation of the street in Latin American cities: The case of Mexico City Centre. In H. Boudagh, A. Versaci, F. Trapani,

M. Migliore and N. Clark (eds.), Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development. Palermo: Springer, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_1

Lara-Hernandez, J.A., Melis, A. and Coulter, C.M. (2018). Using the street in Mexico City Centre: temporary appropriation of public space vs legislation governing street use. The Journal of Public Space, 3(3): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v3i3.1135

Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of the Space. 2nd Ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.