Evaluation of Indicators for Participatory and Collaborative Design Process for Public Parks in Malaysia: Analytical Hierarchy Process
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public participation is deemed relevant and essential for ensuring a holistic approach with equal weighting in implementing the three sustainable pillars of environment, economy and society. Malaysia’s effective implementation of sustainable development frameworks also relies heavily on public participation activities. This participation allows for the incorporation of diverse perspectives, knowledge and experiences, ensuring that decisions and policies address the needs and aspirations of the affected community. This study examines the ranking of indicators for public participation exercises in park design in Malaysia. Using the analytical hierarchy process, 22 indicators from three main clusters were evaluated using a quantitative approach based on the opinions of subject matter experts. The methods of approach, types of public and public park design criteria are discussed in the results for the three construction phases recommended for implementation. This study establishes ranking indicators for each cluster relative to the three stages of development. The findings contribute to improving the present work process of the landscape architecture department at local authorities in Malaysia, ensuring an enhanced, holistic and impactful approach to participatory and collaborative design processes for public parks in Malaysia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abelson, J., Forest, P.G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 57(2): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X
Acuti, D., Bellucci, M. and Manetti, G. (2020). Company disclosures concerning the resilience of cities from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) perspective. Cities, 99: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102608
Ali, M.A.M. and Arifin, K. (2020). Public participation as a decision maker in local plans at local authority. Akademika, 90(1): 151–163. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/15383/1/33152-125411-1-PB.pdf
Abelson, J., Forest, P.G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.P. (2019). Factors contributing to the success and weakness of public participation in local plans at local authority Malaysia: A review. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage, 3(2): 1–7.
Anuar, M.I.N.M. and Saruwono, M. (2018). Obstacles of public participation in the design process of public parks. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 3(6): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v3i6.247
Chear, S.L.S., Hamzah, S.H., Yusof, N.M. and Nordin, N. (2021). Parents and neighbourhood engagement to enhance the quality of maintenance and safety of playgrounds in private kindergartens. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan, 10(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpak.vol10.1.1.2021
Creighton, J.L. (2005). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darko, A., Chan, A.P.C., Ameyaw, E.E., Owusu, E.K., Pärn, E. and Edwards, D.J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5): 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098
Eckerd, A. and Heidelberg, R.L. (2020). Administering public participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2): 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
Feng, L., Wu, Q., Wu, W. and Liao, W. (2020). Decision-maker-oriented vs. collaboration: China’s public participation in environmental decision-making. Sustainability, 12(4): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041334
Fonseca, L.M., Domingues, J.P. and Dima, A.M. (2020). Mapping the sustainable development goals relationships. Sustainability, 12(8): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083359
Ghiasi, S., Hassanzadeh, M. and Forghanifar, B. (2015). Role of public participation in sustainable city. Paper presented at the International Conference on Research in Science and Technology. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14 December.
Johnson, C. (2014). Local civic participation can help reinforce the legitimacy of the democratic system. Democratic Audit Blog, July. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59142 [Accessed on 3rd February 2022].
Kamaruddin, N. and Rogers, R.A. (2020). Malaysia’s democratic and political transformation. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 47(2): 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1715046
Khair, N.K.M., Lee, K.E. and Mokhtar, M. (2020). Sustainable city and community empowerment through the implementation of community-based monitoring: A conceptual approach. Sustainability, 12(22): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229583
Lanang, W.N.W.W. and Hassan, M.S. (2021). Crime prevention program in Perak through the role of the royal malaysian police (PDRM) and the community. Perspektif: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 13(1): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol13.1.8.2021
Liu, L., Chen, J., Cai, Q., Huang, Y. and Lang, W. (2020). System building and multistakeholder involvement in public participatory community planning through both collaborative-and micro-regeneration. Sustainability, 12(21): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218808
Manaf, H.A., Mohamed, A.M. and Lawton, A. (2016). Assessing public participation initiatives in local government decision-making in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11): 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1035788
Marzuki, A. (2015). Challenges in the public participation and the decision making process. Sociologija I Prostor, 53(201): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.53.1.2
Moulay, A. and Ujang, N. (2021). Insight into the issue of underutilised parks: what triggers the process of place attachment? International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1885039
Mullenbach, L.E., Baker, B.L., Benfield, J., Hickerson, B. and Mowen, A.J. (2019). Assessing the relationship between community engagement and perceived ownership of an urban park in Philadelphia. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(3): 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1581719
Nurudin, S.M., Hashim, R., Rahman, S., Zulkifli, N., Mohamed, A.S.P. and Hamik, S.A. (2015). Public participation process at local government administration: A case study of the Seremban Municipal Council, Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211: 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.067
Perpaduan Malaysia (2023). Membangun Malaysia Madani melalui konsep perpaduan dalam kepelbagaian. Available at: https://www.perpaduan.gov.my/images/2023/dasar/PerpaduanMalaysiaMadani/PerpaduanMalaysiaMadani.pdf [Accessed on 2nd February 2024].
Putra, F. (2019). Examining the link between democracy, social policy and inclusive development in South-East Asia. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 13(3): 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12175
Putra, F. and Aminuddin, M.F. (2020). Democracy and social policy in Southeast Asia: A comparative process tracing analysis. Jurnal Politik, 5(2): 221–258. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i2.266
Ramli, N.A. and Ujang, N. (2020). Adaptation of social attributes of place in creative placemaking towards social sustainability. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 5(18): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v5i18.202
Saaty, T. and Vargas, L. (2001). Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1
Saaty, T.L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: RWS publications.
Samsudin, M.N.M., Masram, H. and Yassin, A.M. (2021). Kepentingan pembangunan taman rekreasi awam di Parit Raja, Batu Pahat. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 2(1): 1332–1343.
Sondermann, E. and Ulbert, C. (2021). Transformation through “meaningful” partnership? SDG 17 as metagovernance norm and its global health implementation. Politics and Governance, 9(1): 152–163. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3656
Sonet, U.N., Klufallah, M., Dixon, T.J. and Peters, M. (2023). Factors contributing to public participation framework in public parks design in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18: 207–218.
Sonet, U.N., Klufallah, M., Peters, M.D. and Dixon, T.J. (2021). Indicators of the public participation exercise for designing public parks in Malaysia: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(21): 12119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112119
Ujang, N., Moulay, A. and Zakariya, K. (2015). Sense of well-being indicators: Attachment to public parks in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202: 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.195
Webler, T., Tuler, S. and Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27(3): 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010160
Welsh, B. (1996). Attitudes toward democracy in Malaysia: Challenges to the regime? Asian Survey, 36(9): 882–903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645537
Yaakob, H. (2012). Factors contributing to the success and weakness of public participation in local plans at local authority Malaysia: A review. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage, 3(2): 67–84.
Yunos, M.Y.M., Isa, N.K.M., Hillier, J. and Ismail, N.A. (2015). Landscape architects’ perspective on public participation technique in landscape planning and design: A case study of Kuala Lumpur. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 747: 184–187. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.747.184
Zolkafli, A., Brown, G. and Liu, Y. (2017). An evaluation of participatory GIS (PGIS) for land use planning in Malaysia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 83(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00610.x