A Comprehensive Analysis of Safety Predictors in Construction Sites: A DEMATEL-Based Model
Main Article Content
Abstract
The construction industry, vital for economic growth and human capital development, faces significant safety challenges, particularly in the Malaysian context. Despite technological advancements, addressing safety concerns necessitates a deeper understanding of behavioural interventions. This study explores the critical factors influencing safety compliance intention and safety participation in the Malaysian construction industry, utilising the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) as its theoretical framework. TPB posits that actual behaviour can be predicted by intention, while the formation of intention is mainly determined by attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. Despite the posited framework considering TPB, there is no evidence to prove the correlation between safety predictors, safety compliance intention and safety participation. This study examines the influence of safety predictors on safety compliance intention and safety participation by using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. Based on the DEMATEL technique, 25 experts were invited to provide pairwise ranking on the predictors influencing safety compliance intention and safety participation. The predictors examined in the study include “Attitude”, “Subjective norm”, “Perceived behavioural control”, “Types of leadership styles”, “Safety knowledge”, “Safety climate”, “Safety motivation”, “Risk perception” and “Communication”. Among these predictors, the study revealed significant relationships between all safety predictors, with “Attitude” emerging as the most impactful predictor. Organisations should prioritise this to enhance safety performance. Safety performance in construction projects can be improved and intervened in when the interrelationships between safety predictors, safety compliance intention and safety participation are fully understood.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Albarkani, M.S.S. and Shafii, H. (2021). Construction safety and performance in Malaysian construction industry: A review. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 8(2): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtmb.2021.08.02.008
Andriessen, J.H.T.H. (1978). Safe behaviour and safety motivation. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 1(4): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6349(78)90006-8
Aryee, S. and Hsiung, H.H. (2016). Regulatory focus and safety outcomes: An examination of the mediating influence of safety behavior. Safety Science, 86: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.011
Asilian-Mahabadi, H., Khosravi, Y., Hassanzadeh-Rangi, N., Hajizadeh, E. and Behzadan, A.H. (2020). Factors affecting unsafe behavior in construction projects: Development and validation of a new questionnaire. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(2): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243
Barbaranelli, C., Petitta, L. and Probst, T.M. (2015). Does safety climate predict safety performance in Italy and the USA? Cross-cultural validation of a theoretical model of safety climate. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 77: 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.012
Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: MLQ; Manual and Sampler Set. California: Mind Garden, Inc. Available at: https://www.mindgarden.com/documents/MLQGermanPsychometric.pdf [Accessed on 1 June 2023].
Borman, W.C. and Motowidlo, S.M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt and W.C. Borman (eds.), Personnel Selection in Organisations. San Francisco: Psychology Faculty Publications, 71–98.
Brondino, M., Silva, S.A. and Pasini, M. (2012). Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link. Safety Science, 50(9): 1847–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.010
Burns, J.M. (2012). Leadership. New York: Open Road Media.
Chan, A.P.C., Javed, A.A., Wong, F.K.W., Hon, C.K.H. and Lyu, S. (2017). Evaluating the safety climate of ethnic minority construction workers in Hong Kong. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000333
Chen, C.F. and Chen, S.C. (2014). Measuring the effects of safety management system practices, morality leadership and self-efficacy on pilots’ safety behaviors: Safety motivation as a mediator. Safety Science, 62: 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.013
Choi, B. and Lee, S.H. (2022). The psychological mechanism of construction workers’ safety participation: The social identity theory perspective. Journal of Safety Research, 82: 194–206 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.011
Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C. and Burke, M.J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
Didla, S., Mearns, K. and Flin, R. (2009). Safety citizenship behaviour: A proactive approach to risk management. Journal of Risk Research, 12(3–4): 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903041433
Fang, D., Chen, Y. and Wong, L. (2006). Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(6): 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:6(573)
Fang, D., Wu, C. and Wu, H. (2015). Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000355
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gholamnia, R., Ebrahimian, M., Gendeshmin, S.B., Saeedi, R. and Firooznia, S. (2019). Effective factors on the occurrence of falling from height accidents in construction projects by using dematel method. In S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia,
S. Albolino., T. Alexander and Y. Fujita (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018): Volume IV; Organizational Design and Management (ODAM), Professional Affairs, Forensic. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 293–305.
Goh, Y.M., Ubeynarayana, C.U., Wong, K.L.X. and Guo, B.H.W. (2018). Factors influencing unsafe behaviors: A supervised learning approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 118: 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.002
Griffin, M.A. and Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety climate in organisations: New challenges and frontiers for theory, research and practice. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3: 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414
Griffin, M.A. and Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3): 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
Hedlund, A., Åteg, M., Andersson, I.M. and Rosén, G. (2010). Assessing motivation for work environment improvements: internal consistency, reliability and factorial structure. Journal of Safety Research, 41: 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.12.005
Hinze, J., Thurman, S. and Wehle, A. (2013). Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety Science, 51(1): 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.016
Hu, X., Yeo, G. and Griffin, M. (2020). More to safety compliance than meets the eye: Differentiating deep compliance from surface compliance. Safety Science, 130: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104852
Inness, M., Turner, N., Barling, J. and Stride, C.B. (2010). Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019380
Jiang, Z., Fang, D. and Zhang, M. (2015). Understanding the causation of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors based on system dynamics modeling. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6): 04014099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000350
Khahro, S.H., Ali, T.H., Memon, N.A. and Memon, Z.A. (2020). Occupational accidents: A comparative study of construction and manufacturing industries. Current Science, 118(2): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v118/i2/243-248
Kouabenan, D.R., Ngueutsa, R. and Mbaye, S. (2015). Safety climate, perceived risk and involvement in safety management. Safety Science, 77: 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.009
Lee, C.K., Yiu, T.W. and Cheung, S.O. (2018a). Understanding intention to use alternative dispute resolution in construction projects: Framework based on technology acceptance model. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(1): 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000245
. (2018b). Application of the theory of planned behavior to alternative dispute resolution selection and use in construction projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(2): 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000252
Lee, P.C., Wei, J., Ting, H.I., Lo, T.P., Long, D. and Chang, L.M. (2019). Dynamic analysis of construction safety risk and visual tracking of key factors based on behavior-based safety and building information modeling. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23: 4155–4167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0283-z
Lin, C.L. and Tzeng, G.H. (2009). A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6): 9683–9697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.040
Liou, J.J.H., Tzeng, G.H. and Chang, H.C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4): 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.008
Liu, Y., Ye, L. and Guo, M. (2019). The influence of occupational calling on safety performance among train drivers: The role of work engagement and perceived organizational support. Safety Science, 120: 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.025
Martínez-Córcoles, M., Schöbel, M., Gracia, F.J., Tomás, I. and Peiró, J.M. (2012). Linking empowering leadership to safety participation in nuclear power plants: A structural equation model. Journal of Safety Research, 43(3): 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2012.07.002
Mcfadden, K.L., Henagan, S.C. and Iii, C.R.G. (2009). The patient safety chain: Transformational leadership’s effect on patient safety culture, initiatives and outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 27(5): 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.01.001
Mohammadi, A., Tavakolan, M. and Khosravi, Y. (2018). Developing safety archetypes of construction industry at project level using system dynamics. Journal of Safety Research, 67: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.010
Mohandes, S.R., Sadeghi, H., Fazeli, A., Mahdiyar, A., Hosseini, M.R., Arashpour, M. and Zayed, T. (2022). Causal analysis of accidents on construction sites: A hybrid fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach. Safety Science, 151: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105730
Neal, A., Griffin, M.A. and Hart, P.M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
Neill, M.S., Men, L.R. and Yue, C.A. (2019). How communication climate and organizational identification impact change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2): 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-06-2019-0063
Newaz, M.T., Davis, P., Jefferies, M. and Pillay, M. (2016). The psychological contract of safety: The missing link between safety climate and safety behaviour in construction sites. In P. Arezes (ed.), Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Safety Management and Human Factors, July 27–31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 199–210.
Northouse, P.G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 9th Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing.
Nykänen, M., Salmela-Aro, K., Askotolvanen and Vuori, J. (2019). Safety self-efficacy and internal locus of control as mediators of safety motivation: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) study. Safety Science, 117: 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.037
Peker, M., Doğru, O.C. and Meşe, G. (2022). Role of supervisor behavioral integrity for safety in the relationship between top-management safety climate, safety motivation and safety performance. Safety and Health at Work, 13: 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.006
Sampson, J.M., DeArmond, S. and Chen, P.Y. (2014). Role of safety stressors and social support on safety performance. Safety Science, 64: 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.025
Seo, H.C., Lee, Y.S., Kim, J.J. and Jee, N.Y. (2015). Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Safety Science, 77: 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.010
Shieh, J.I., Wu, H.H. and Huang, K.K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23: 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
Singh, A. and Misra, S.C. (2020). A dominance based rough set analysis for investigating employee perception of safety at workplace and safety compliance. Safety Science, 127: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104702
Sumrit, D and Anuntavoranich, P.(2013) Using DEMATEL method to analyze the causal relations on technological innovation capability evaluation factors in Thai technology-based firms. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management and Applied Sciences and Technologies, 4(2): 81–103.
Swarna, S.K., Tezeswi, T.P. and Siva, K.M.V.N. (2022). Implementing construction waste management in India: An extended theory of planned behaviour approach. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 27: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102401
Wang, J., Zou, P.X.W. and Li, P.P. (2016). Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers’ safety risk tolerances. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 93: 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.027
Xia, N., Wang, X., Griffin, M.A., Wu, C. and Liu, B. (2017). Do we see how they perceive risk? An integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 106: 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010
Xia, N., Xie, Q., Hu, X., Wang, X. and Meng, H. (2020). A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 134: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350
Xu, N., Ma, L., Liu, Q., Wang, L. and Deng, Y. (2021). An improved text mining approach to extract safety risk factors from construction accident reports. Safety Science, 138: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105216
Ye, G., Yue, H., Yang, J., Li, H., Xiang, Q., Fu, Y. and Cui, C. (2020). Understanding the sociocognitive process of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors: An agent-based modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051588
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organisations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1): 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96