Indicative planning decision using life cycle costs considerations for green building development projects

Main Article Content

Nurul Afiqah Yunus
Natasha Khalil
Kharizam Ismail
Nurul Azhani Yunus
Evie Sendi Ibil

Abstract

In the current critical economy, demands have exceeded the mere creation and construction of green buildings. The primary obstacle to expansion in the green building business is the impression of elevated costs linked to these structures. It has been commonly recognised that evaluating project costs based on initial expenditures is inadequate. Consequently, life cycle costs (LCC) aids owners and clients in making informed decisions on building materials during the project’s design phase. The criteria or components of LCC should ideally be established before the decision to advance with the project. Nevertheless, LCC components for sustainable projects are disjointed and the pieces are not organised into an appropriate system. This scenario, exacerbated by the lack of adequate information on LCC components for sustainable projects, poses difficulties for project stakeholders in implementing LCC. Hence, the purpose of this study was to ascertain LCC components and their respective significance in the context of a green building project, in order to inform planning decisions. The primary tool for data collection was a questionnaire survey. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to disseminate the questionnaire to 84 stakeholders engaged in Green Building Index (GBI)-rated office projects in Kuala Lumpur. The survey indicated that the respondents concurred with the 23 elements of LCC as guiding planning criteria for green construction initiatives. The analysis using the relative importance index revealed that, out of the total 23 components, the 10 most important LCC components were materials costs, initial costs, management costs, installation costs, labour costs, green building certification costs, insurance, safety management costs, design and professional costs and equipment costs. The findings are useful in helping green project stakeholders make planning decisions before moving forward with the development of green projects.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurul Afiqah Yunus, Natasha Khalil, Kharizam Ismail, Nurul Azhani Yunus, and Evie Sendi Ibil. 2025. “Indicative Planning Decision Using Life Cycle Costs Considerations for Green Building Development Projects”. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries 30 (Supp. 1): 205–222. https://doi.org/10.21315/.
Section
Articles

References

Abidin, N.Z. and Azizi, N.Z.M. (2021). Soft costs elements: Exploring management components of project costs in green building projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87: 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106545

Adham, K.N., Siwar, C. and Aziz, S.A.A.G. (2015). Kajian empirikal amalan perolehan hijau kerajaan di Malaysia. In N. Chamhur, L.C. Siang, F.F. Said and H. Wahid (eds.), Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke-10. Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 338–349.

Advancing Professional Construction and Programme Management (2022). What is Construction Management? Available at: https://www.cmaanet.org/about-us/what-construction-management

Ahmad, K. (2011). Construction Economics. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

Alshamrani, O.S. (2020). Initial costs forecasting model of mid-rise green office buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 19(6): 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1778005

Bohari, A.A.M., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., Teo, M. and Khalil, N. (2020). Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270: 122246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122246

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th Ed. London: Pearson Education.

Dall’O’, G. (2013). Green Energy Audit of Buildings: A Guide for a Sustainable Energy Audit of Buildings. London: Springer.

Darussalam, G. and Hussin, S. (2021). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan. 3rd Ed. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

De Giacomo, M.R., Testa, F., Iraldo, F. and Formentini, M. (2019). Does green public procurement lead to life cycle costing (LCC) adoption? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(3): 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.05.001

Dwaikat, L.N. (2016). Actual life cycle costs performance measurement of green building using earn value approach. Phd diss. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Dwaikat, L.N. and Ali, K.N. (2018). Green buildings life cycle costs analysis and life cycle budget development: Practical applications. Building Engineering, 18: 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.015

Economic Planning Unit (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021–2025: A Prosperous, Inclusive, Sustainable Malaysia. Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department.

Fan, K., Chan, E.H.W. and Chau, C.K. (2018). Costs and benefits of implementing green building economic incentives: Case study of a gross floor area concession scheme in Hong Kong. Sustainability, 10(8): 2814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082814

Firsani, T. and Utomo, C. (2012). Analisa life cycle cost pada green building diamond building Malaysia. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 1(1): D34–D39. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v1i1.1030

Gopanagoni, V. and Velpula, S.L. (2020). An analytical approach on life cycle costs analysis of a green building. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33: 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.226

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hajare, A. and Elwakil, E. (2019). Life cycle costs analysis of energy efficient single family residence. Paper presented at the 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ISEC-10). Chicago, USA, 20–25 May.

Hallen (2020). Building design and construction costs. Available at: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Building_design_and_construction_costs [Accessed on 15 June 2022].

International Organization for Standardization (2017). ISO 15686-5:2017 Buildings and constructed assets: Service life planning. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/iso:std:iso:15686:-5:ed-2:v1:en [Accessed on 20 May 2020].

Public Works Department (PWD) (2023). Garis Panduan Kos Kitaran Hayat 2.0. Putrajaya: PWD.

Kahlenborn, W., Mansor, N. and Adham, K.N. (2014). Perolehan Hiįau Keraįaan: Garis Panduan kepada Pegawai Perolehan Keraįaan. Selangor, Malaysia: Malaysian Green Technology Corporation and Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau dan Air (KeTTHA).

Kale, N.N., Joshi, D. and Menon, R. (2016). Life cycle costs analysis of commercial buildings with energy efficient approach. Perspectives in Science, 8: 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.102

Khalil, N., Bohari, A.A.M, Shamsudin, S.M., Rashid, A.F.A. and Husin, H.N. (2021). Key approaches of life-cycle costs in green government procurement (GGP) for green projects. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 19(2): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i16.949

Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau dan Air (KeTTHA) (2017). Low Carbon Cities Framework and Assessment System (LCCF). Putrajaya: KeTTHA.

Lee, Z.P. and Chu, H.C. (2016). A study to compare the costs of operation and maintenance in green building index (GBI) and non-green building index (non-GBI) rated building in Malaysia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66: 1–6.

Murugan, M. and Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Analysis of barriers to adopt electric vehicles in India using fuzzy DEMATEL and Relative Importance Index approaches. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2): 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.02.007

Mustafa, M.F. (2012). Low carbon cities framework and assessment system. Available at: http://www.jpbdselangor.gov.my/Laporan/mampan/KETTHA.pdf [Accessed on 3 June 2020].

Oduyemi, O., Okoroh, M.I., Fajana, O.S. and Arowosafe, O. (2018). The need for economic performance measures for life cycle costing of sustainable commercial office buildings. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(1): 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-08-2017-0035

Putro, R.W.S. (2019). Analisis life cycle costs pada green building peringkat platinum di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Intelektual Muda, 1(1): 368–373. https://doi.org/10.25105/psia.v1i1.5982

Rahim, F.A., Muzaffar, S.A., Yusoff, N.S.M., Zainon, N. and Wang, C. (2014). Sustainable construction through life cycle costing. Journal of Building Performance, 5(1): 84–94.

RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects) (2020). RIBA Plan of Work 2020 Overview. London: RIBA.

Shabrin, N. and Kashem, S.B.A. (2017). A comprehensive costs benefit analysis of green building. Paper presented at the 94th The IIER International Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25–26 February.

Shakantu, W., Tookey, J.E. and Bowen, P.A. (2003). The hidden costs of transportation of construction materials: An overview. Journal for Engineering, Design and Technology, 1(1): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060892

SIRIM QAS International (2019). Eco-labelling scheme. Available at: https://www.sirim-qas.com.my/our-services/product-certification/eco-labelling-scheme [Accessed on 19 July 2020].

Sutrisna, M., Cooper-Cooke, B., Goulding, J. and Ezcan, V. (2019). Investigating the costs of offsite construction housing in Western Australia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 12(1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-05-2018-0029

Tholibon, D.A., Nujid, M.M., Mokhtar, H., Rahim, J.A., Aziz, N.F.A. and Tarmizi, A.A.A. (2021). Relative importance index (RII) in ranking the factors of employer satisfaction towards industrial training students. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(4): 493–503. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i4.187

Tsai, W.H., Yang, C.H., Chang, J.C. and Lee, H.L. (2014). An activity-based costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2): 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.024

Weerasinghe, A.S. and Ramachandra, T. (2018). Economic sustainability of green buildings: A comparative analysis of green vs. non-green. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(5): 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-10-2017-0105

Wimala, M., Akmalah, E. and Sururi, M.R. (2016). Breaking through the barriers to green building movement in Indonesia: Insights from building occupants. Energy Procedia, 100: 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.204

Zainol, N.N., Mohammad, I.S., Baba, M., Woon, N.B., Ramli, N.A., Nazri, A.Q. and Lokman, M.A.A. (2014). Critical factors that lead to green building operations and maintenance problems in Malaysia: A preliminary study. Advanced Materials Research, 935: 23–26.

Zhang, L., Wu, J. and Liu, H. (2018). Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 2234–2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.188