Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome Among Nigerian Laboratory University Workers
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indoor air quality refers to the air quality in and around laboratory buildings and facilities, which directly affects the health and comfort of workers. Poor air quality poses numerous health challenges to the laboratory workers and environment, and causes sick building syndrome (SBS) among workers. The objective of this study is to determine associations of SBS related to indoor air concentration in a dose dependent manner among Nigerian laboratory university workers. This was a cross-sectional study on a population-based sample of Nigerian university laboratories and the workers. Data were collected using an indoor air quality control meter, dosimeter tubes gases of interest, and a set of questionnaires (MM-40). The results showed that the mean indoor air concentrations in a dose-dependent manner for chemical parameters range from 473.0 ppm to753.0 ppm, 17.9 ppm to 27.3 ppm, 5.7 ppm to 8.5 ppm, and 6.3 ppm to 9.1 ppm for CO2 , CO, NO2, H2S and SO2, respectively. The prevalence of SBS, i.e., skin-related syndrome (SRS) is 38.5%, general-related symptom (GRS) is 28.3%, mucosal-related symptom (MRS) is 19.2% and at least one score was a respiratory-related symptom (RRS), which is 13.9%. The significant associated factors of SBS revealed by multinomial logistic regression in this study were NO2 [SRS (P = 0.022), GRS (P = 0.023), MRS (P = 0.032)], H2 S [SRS (P = 0.031), GRS (P < 0.001), MRS (P = 0.021)], and SO2 [SRS (P = 0.001), GRS (P < 0.001), MRS (P = 0.022)]. On the other hand, office laboratory temperature and relative humidity were shown to be negatively statistically associated with prevalence symptoms relative to RRS. In this study, SBS was found to be high. Indoor air concentration in a dose-dependent manner and environmental parameters could increase the prevalence and incidence of SBS-related symptoms. Therefore, it is important to educate the workers on occupational and environmental health at a workplace to minimise SBS in the future.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R. & Albalak, R. (2000). Indoor air pollution in developing countries: A major environmental and public health challenge. Bull. World Health Org., 78(9), 1078–1092.
Chang, C.-J. et al. (2015). Prevalence of sick building syndrome-related symptoms among hospital workers in confined and open working spaces. Aaqr. Org., 15(6S), 2378–2384, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.01.0040.
Chirico, F. et al. (2017). Prevalence and risk factors for sick building syndrome among Italian correctional officers: A pilot study. J. Health Sci., 2(1), 31–46.
Fang, L. et al. (2004). Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance. Indoor Air, 14(S7), 74–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00276.x.
Fanou, L. A. et al. (2006). Survey of air pollution in Cotonou, Benin: Air monitoring and biomarkers. Sci. Total Env., 358(1), 85–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.025.
Goodyear, M. D., Krleza-Jeric, K. & Lemmens, T. (2007). The declaration of Helsinki. Br. Med. J., 335(7621), 624–625, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39339.610000.BE.
Laurent, A., Olsen, S. I. & Hauschild, M. Z. (2012). Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46(7), 4100–4108, https://doi.org/10.1021/es204163f.
Maddalena, R. et al. (2015). Effects of ventilation rate per person and per floor area on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome symptoms, and decision‐making. Indoor Air, 25(4), 362–370, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12149.
Madureira, J. et al. (2016). Indoor air quality in Portuguese schools: Levels and sources of pollutants. Indoor Air, 26(4), 526–537, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12237.
Maula, H. et al. (2017). The effect of low ventilation rate with elevated bioeffluent concentration on work performance, perceived indoor air quality and health symptoms. Indoor Air, 27(6), 1141–1153, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12387.
Merrill, R. M. (2008). Environmental epidemiology: Principles and methods. Massachusett: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Mourshed, M. & Zhao, Y. (2012). Healthcare providers' perception of design factors related to physical environments in hospitals. J. Environ. Psych., 32(4), 362–370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.004.
Neghab, M. et al. (2017). Exposure to cooking fumes and acute reversible decrement in lung functional capacity. Int. J. Occ. Environ. Med., 8, 1100–1116, https://doi.org/10.15171/ijoem.2017.1100.
Norbäck, D. (2009). An update on sick building syndrome. Curr. Op. Algy Clin. Immun., 9(1), 55–59, https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0b013e32831f8f08.
Norbäck, D. & Nordström, K. (2008). Sick building syndrome in relation to air exchange rate, CO2, room temperature and relative air humidity in university computer classrooms: An experimental study. Int. Arch. Occ. Environ. Health, 82(1), 21–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0301-9.
Sahlberg, B., Mi, Y.-H. & Norbäck, D. (2009). Indoor environment in dwellings, asthma, allergies, and sick building syndrome in the Swedish population: A longitudinal cohort study from 1989 to 1997. Int. Arch. Occ. Environ. Health, 82(10), 1211–1218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0444-3.
Salama, K. F., Alhajri, R. F. & Al-Anazi, A. A. (2017). Assessment of air quality in bus terminal stations in Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Comm. Med. Pub. Health, 4(5), 1413–1418, https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20171748.
Sapkota, A. et al. (2017). Indoor air quality and its health impacts in Thame, Sagarmath National Park, Nepal. Linn. Eco-Tech., 1073–1081.
Scheepers, P. T. et al. (2017). Chemical characterization of the indoor air quality of a university hospital: Penetration of outdoor air pollutants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health, 14(5), 497, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050497.
Spengler, J. D. & Chen, Q. (2000). Indoor air quality factors in designing a healthy building. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ., 25(1), 567–600, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.567.
Takaoka, M., Suzuki, K. & Norbäck, D. (2016). Sick building syndrome among junior high school students in Japan in relation to the home and school environment. Glob. J. Health Sci., 8(2), 165–177.
Takigawa, T. et al. (2010). Relationship between indoor chemical concentrations and subjective symptoms associated with sick building syndrome in newly built houses in Japan. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 83(2), 225–235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0475-9.
Tunsaringkarn, T. et al. (2013). Benzene exposure and its association with sickness exhibited in gasoline station workers. Int. J. Environ. Poll. Sol., 1, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.7726/ijeps.2013.1001.
Wolkoff, P. & Nielsen, G. D. (2010). Non-cancer effects of formaldehyde and relevance for setting an indoor air guideline. Environ. Int., 36(7), 788–799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.012.
Zhang, X. et al. (2014). A longitudinal study of sick building syndrome (SBS) among pupils in relation to SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in schools in China. PLOS ONE, 9(11), e112933, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112933.