Functionalised Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes/Cellulose Acetate Butyrate Mixed Matrix Membrane for CO2/N2 Separation
Main Article Content
Abstract
The emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially carbon dioxide (CO2), has been rising indiscriminately causing serious global warming issues. Therefore, to prevent severe consequences of global warming, stern efforts need to be taken to minimise the global GHG emission. One of the most suitable approaches chosen for removal of CO2 is the gas separation membrane technology. The main objective of this work is to synthesise a membrane with good CO2 permeance and CO2/nitrogen (N2) selectivity that can be applied in the industry. Firstly, the cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) polymer matrix of molecular weight (Mn) 65000 was used to synthesise the membranes with different solvent evaporation times (4 min, 5 min and 6 min) and different solvent exchange drying times (15 min, 30 min and 60 min). Since the performance of the obtained CAB membrane performance was still relatively low (CO2/N2 selectivity of 0.978 ± 0.011), the mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) were introduced. The MMM was fabricated by using 4 wt% of CAB polymer of molecular weight (Mn) 65000 and 0.1 wt% of functionalised multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs-F). In addition, the effect of different MWCNT loadings (0.2 wt% to 1.2 wt%) and acetyl contents (12 wt%–15 wt% and 28 wt%–31 wt%) on CO2/N2 separation were also investigated. The results proved that the MMM prepared from the CAB polymer of Mn 65000 and 0.1 wt% of MWCNTs with higher acetyl content, i.e., from 28 wt% to 31 wt% had better performance in terms of CO2/N2 selectivity (2.887 ± 0.068).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Global Carbon Budget. (2017). Highlights. Retrieved 19 November 2017 from http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/17/highlights.htm.
Leung, D. Y. C., Giorgio, C. & Mercedes, M-V. M. (2014). An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 39, 426–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093.
Bhunia S. et al. (2017). Triazine containing N-rich microporous organic polymers for CO2 capture and unprecedented CO2/N2 selectivity. J. Solid State Chem., 247,113–119.
Favre, E. (2007). Carbon dioxide recovery from post-combustion processes: Can gas permeation membranes compete with absorption? J. Membr. Sci., 294, 50–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.007.
Yong, W. F. et al. (2018). New polyethersulfone (PESU) hollow fiber membranes for CO2 capture. J. Membr. Sci., 552, 305–314.
Nath, K. (2017). Membrane separation processes. New Delhi: PHI Learning.
Ismail, A. F. et al. (2011). Gas separation performance of polyethersulfone/multiwalled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol., 80(1), 20–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0281-2.
Minhas, B. S. (1992). Cellulose acetate butyrate gas separation membrane. New York: W. R. Grace & Co.
Wang, Y., Lau, W. W. Y. & Sourirajan, S. (2006). Effects of membrane-making conditions and shrinkage treatment on morphology and performance of cellulose acetate butyrate membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol., 29(13), 1689–1704, https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399408002165.
Jami’an, W. N. R. et al. (2016). Effect of evaporation time on cellulose acetate membrane for gas separation. IOP Conf. Earth Environ. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012008.
Paulsen, F. G., Shojaie, S. S. & Krantz, W. B. (1994). Effect of evaporation step on macrovoid formation in wet-cast polymeric membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 91(3), 265–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)80088-X.
Jawad, Z. A. et al. (2015). Influence of solvent exchange time on mixed matrix membrane separation performance for CO2/N2 and a kinetic sorption study. J. Membr. Sci., 476, 590–601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.008.
Lui, A. & Talbot, F. D. F. (1988). Studies on the solvent exchange techique for making dry cellulose acetate membranes for the separation of gaseous mixtures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 36, 1809–1820.
Robeson, L. M., (2008). The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci., 320(1–2), 390–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030.
Kim, S., Pechar, T. W. & Marand, E. (2005). Poly(imide siloxane) and carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Desalin., 192(1–3), 330–339.
Rivas, B. L., Sanchez, J. & Palencia, M. (2017). Nanostructured polymer membranes organic membranes and polymers for the removal of pollutants. In Visaka, P. M. & Nazarenko, O. (Eds.). Nanostructured polymer membranes. Ottawa: Scrivener Publishing.
Feng, Y., Zhang, J.-M. & Zhang, J. (2015). Gas separation properties of cellulose acetate butyrate/MWCNTs mixed matrix membranes. Acta Polym. Sin., 12, 1396–1401, https://doi.org/10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2015.15095.
Ahmad, A. L. et al. (2014). A cellulose acetate/multi-walled carbon nanotube mixed matrix membrane for CO2/N2 separation. J. Membr. Sci., 451, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.043.
Chen, J., Dyer, M. J. & Yu, M-F. (2001). Cyclodextrin-mediated soft cutting of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. ACS, 123(25), 6201–6202.
Jawad, Z. A. et al. (2017). Binding stability of β-CD on MWCNTS: Role of washing cycle on the β-CD coating. J. Phys. Sci., 28(Supp. 1), 145–153, https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2017.28.s1.9.
Kohl, A. & Nielsen, R. (1997). Gas purification. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
NanoScience Instruments. (2017). Scanning electron microscopy. Retrieved 5 November 2017 from http://www.nanoscience.com/technology/sem-technology/.
Lee, R. J. et al. (2017). Improvement of CO2/N2 separation performance by polymer matrix cellulose acetate butyrate. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/206/1/012072.
Silverstein, R. M., Bassler, G. C. & Morrill, T. C. (1981). Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Zhang, Q., Lei, L. & Zhu, S. (2017). Gas-responsive polymers. ACS Macro Lett., 6, 515–522, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00245.
Fang, Y. et al. (1994). Effect of surface-modifying macromolecules and solvent evaporation time on the performance of polyethersulfone membranes for the separation of chloroform/water mixtures by pervaporation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 54.
Abdullah, S. N. A., Lau, W. J. & Ismail, A. F. (2015). Morphologies and separation characteristics of polyphenylsulfone-based solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes: Effect of polymer concentration in casting solution and membrane pretreatment condition. Kor. J. Chem. Eng., 32(4), 743–752, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0281-2.
Goh, P. S. et al. (2011). Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol., 81(3), 243–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.042.
Khan, M. M. et al. (2012). Functionalized carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes of polymers of intrinsic microporosity for gas separation. Nanos. Res. Lett., 7(1), 504, https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-504.
Mahajan, R., Koros, W. J. & Thundyil, M. (1999). Mixed matrix membranes: Important and challenging. Membr. Technol., 1999(105), 6–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-2118(00)80157-3.
Ma, P. C., Kim, J.-K. & Tang, B. Z. (2006). Functionalization of carbon nanotubes using a silane coupling agent. Carbon, 44, 3232–3238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.032.
Dotto, G. L. & Paulo, S. (2017). Frontiers in biomaterials: Chitosan based materials and its applications – Application of chitosan membranes for permeation and pervaporation. Abu Dhabi: Bentham Science Publisher.
Silva, E. A. d. et al. (2017). Polydimethylsiloxane membranes containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes for gas separation. Mater. Res., 20(6), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0825.
Fontananova, E. et al. (2015). From hydrophobic to hydrophilic polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) membranes by gaining new insight into material’s properties. RSC Adv., 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA08388E.
Salajkova, M. et al. (2013). Tough nanopaper structures based on cellulose nanofibers and carbon nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol., 87, 103–110.
Puleo, A. C., Paul, D. R. & Kelley, S. S. (1989). The effect of degree of acetylation on gas sorption and transport behavior in cellulose acetate. J. Membr. Sci., 47(3), 301–332.
Zaini, L. H. et al. (2015). Effect of kenaf cellulose whiskers on cellulose acetate butyrate nanocomposites properties nanocellulose polymer nanocomposites. In (Ed). Thakur, V. K. Nanocellulose polymer nanocomposites. London: Scrivener Publishing, 341–354.
Carreon, A. M. (2017). Membranes for gas separation. New York: World Scientific.