The Metrical Parameters of Word Stress Production and Perception among Iraqi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper disscusses the impact of glocalisation process on the production and perception of Iraqi English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in word stress placement pertaining to metrical parameters. Previous studies lack an in-depth investigation of the parameters tracing the prosodic acquisition path of the learners in acquiring L2 (Archibald 1993; Youssef and Mazurkewich 1998). This study which adopts the metrical parameters model of Dresher and Kaye (1990) shows how similar metrical parameters settings of both Arabic and English affect the performance of Iraqi EFL learners in word stress placement. The findings of the study reveal how Iraqi learners of English internalise the conceptualisation of the metrical parameters of English word stress production and perception in their glocalised variety of English as part of learning the language as an international (global) language. The findings of the study also suggest that Iraqi EFL learners assigned more incorrect responses in word stress placement in the perception task than the production task because they followed different parameter-setting orders in acquiring L2, leading to them resetting more parameters wrongly in the perception task than the production task. The study highlights on the importance of accepting both global and local varieties of English in curriculum development in Iraq.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alseady, M. 2006. Shifting from EFL to EIL: History of teaching English for Arabic people. Baghdad: Daralhuria Press.
Altmann, H. 2006. The perception and production of second language stress: A cross linguistic- experimental study. PhD diss., University of Delaware, United States.
Archibald, J. 1993. Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2056-2.
Avery, P. and Ehrich, S. 1992. Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benrabah, M. 1997. Word stress: A source of unintelligibility in English. IRAL 37(3): 157–163, https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1997.35.3.157.
Crystal, D. 1997. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Dresher, B. E. 1999. Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 27–67, https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553959.
Dresher, B. E. and Kaye, J. D. 1990. A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34(2): 137–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90042-I.
Flege, I. E. 2007. Acquiring phonology. In The Cambridge handbook of phonology, ed. de Lacy, P., 537–560. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hochberg, J. 1988. The acquisition of word stress rules in Spanish. PhD diss., Stanford University, United States.
Jones, D. 1972. Outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.
Kirkpatrick, A. 2007. World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meisel, J. 1969. Parameters in acquisition. In The handbook of child language, eds. Fletcher, P. and Machwhinney, B., 224–239. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Pater, J. 1997. Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In Focus on phonological acquisition, eds. Hannahs, S. J., Pater, J. M. and Young-Scholten, M., 235–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______1992. The acquisition of parameters for word stress by French learners of English. PhD diss., Concordia University, Canada.
Roach, P. 2009. English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharifian, F. 2013. Globalisation and developing metacultural competence in learning English as an International Language. Multilingual Education 3(7): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-5059-3-7.
______2010. Glocalization of English in world Englishes: An emerging variety among Persian speakers of English. In Contending with globalisation in world Englishes, eds. Omoniyi, T. and Saxena, M. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
______2003. On cultural conceptualisations. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(3): 187–207, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322336625.
Swales, J. 2004. Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827.
Törkenczy, M. 2013. Word stress. In English phonological analysis, eds. Törkenczy, M., Nádasdy, A., Kiss, Z. G., Szigetvàri, P. and Star?evi?, A., 1–32. Budapest: Department of English Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University. Retrieved from http://seas3.elte.hu/phono-analysis/book.html on 7 June 2015.
Tsou, W. 2015. From globalization to glocalization: Rethinking English language teaching in response to the ELF phenomenon. EaGLE Journal 1(1): 47–63.
Van der Pas, B. and Zonnefeld W. 2004. L2 parameter resetting for metrical systems (an assessment and a reinterpretation of some core literature). The Linguistic Review 21(2): 125–170.
Youssef, A. and Mazurkewich, I. 1998. The acquisition of English metrical parameters and syllable structure by adult native speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene dialect). In The generative study of second language acquisition, eds. Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W. A., 303–332. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.