Mechanisms of Mobility in a Capitalist Culture: The Localisation of the Eye of (Global) Authority in the Novel and the Film of Jhumpa Lahiri's The Namesake
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the modes of objectification of a collective subject described as "Indian American", through the panoptic technologies of literature and cinema as utilised in the United States (US) in the aftermath of 9/11. Following the 2003 publication of the novel by Jhumpa Lahiri, The Namesake, Fox Searchlight Pictures released Mira Nair's cinematic adaptation in 2007. Published in the aftermath of the 9/11 event in the US, the story spans over three decades, telling of the diasporic experiences of a middle-class family of a minority culture, the Gangulis, from their immigration in the 1960s—which historically coincided with the rise of two contrasting social phenomena, Neoliberalism and the Oriental Other—to their present assimilated status into the mainstream American culture. We argue that the literary and cinematographic narratives of The Namesake are employed by the hegemonic state power to offer an antidote to the chronic insecurities unleashed by notions of both Neoliberalism and the Oriental Other. The study outlines the panoptic dimensions of both narratives and unpacks the way their visual, narrative and "characterological architectonics" correspond with what Michel Foucault calls "the carceral mechanisms of power". Novel and film thus act together to instantiate in the public the ideological interests of the capital which, in turn, mobilises the apparatus itself, doing so through narrative techniques that conscript the public into a unified scopic regime. In the diasporic world of The Namesake, as the article concludes, the individual difference is associated with social deviance, in a way that in society, the local subject and its individuality become a signifier of guilt, whereas, assimilation into global cultural pluralism is made synonymous with conformity and normativity.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alfonso-Forero, A. M. 2011. Translating postcolonial pasts: Immigration and identity in the fiction of Bharati Mukherjee, Elizabeth Nunez and Jhumpa Lahiri. PhD diss., University of Miami, Florida.
Arnold, G. B. 2008. Conspiracy theory in film, television and politics. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. 2003. The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. London and New York: Routledge.
Asl, M. P., Hull, S. P. and Abdullah, N. L. 2016. Nihilation of femininity in the battle of looks: A Sartrean reading of Jhumpa Lahiri's "A Temporary Matter". GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 16(2): 123–139.
Aubeeluck, G. 2006. Indian Americans as native informants: Transnationalism in Bharati Mukherjee's "Jasmine", Jhumpa Lahiri's "The Namesake" and Kirin Narayan's "Love, Stars and All That". PhD diss., Illinois State University, Illinois.
Bhalla, T. A. 2008. Between history and identity: Reading the authentic in South Asian diasporic literature and community. PhD diss., The University of Michigan, Michigan.
Bose, S. 2010. The family as the new collectivity of belonging in the fiction of Bharati Mukherjee and Jhumpa Lahiri. PhD diss., University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Cheung, F. and Dhingra, L. 2012. The inheritance of postcolonial loss, Asian American melancholia and strategies of compensation in Jhumpa Lahiri's "The Namesake". In Naming Jhumpa Lahiri: Canons and controversies, eds.
Dhingra, L. and Cheung, F., 27–50. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books. Cohen, R. 1995. Rethinking "Babylon": Iconoclastic conceptions of the diasporic experience. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 21(1): 5–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1995.9976469.
Das, S. K. 2013. Bengali diasporic culture: A study of the film adaptation of Jhumpa Lahiri's "The Namesake" (2003). The Criterion, an International Journal on English 4(2): 1–8.
Dhingra, L. 2012. Feminizing men? Moving beyond Asian American literary gender wars in Jhumpa Lahiri's fiction. In Naming Jhumpa Lahiri: Canons and controversies, eds. Dhingra, L. and Cheung, F., 135–155. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
Dhingra, L. and Cheung, F., eds. 2012. Naming Jhumpa Lahiri: Canons and controversies. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
Ferguson, R. A. and Hong, G. K. 2012. The sexual and racial contradictions of neoliberalism. Journal of Homosexuality 59(7): 1057–1064, https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.699848.
Foucault, M. 1995/1977. Discipline and punish, trans. Sheridan, A. New York: Vintage.
Ganguly, K. 2001. States of exception: Everyday life and postcolonial identity. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
Grewal, I. 2005. Transnational America: Feminisms, diasporas, neoliberalisms. Durham and London: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386544.
______2003. Transnational America: Race, gender and citizenship after 9/11. Social Identities 9(4): 535–561, https://doi.org/10.1080/1350463032000174669.
Hale, J. 1996. Are lesbians women?. Hypatia 11(2): 94–121, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb00666.x.
Hall, S. 2007. Cultural identity and diaspora. In Transatlantic literary studies: A reader, eds. Susan Manning, S. and Taylor, A., 131–139. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hilaire, D. H. S. 2006. Immigrant West Indian families and their struggles with racism in America. Journal of Emotional Abuse 6(2–3): 47–60, https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v06n02_04.
Hurley, J. S. 1997. After the Panopticon: Surveillance, scopophilia and the subject of the gaze. PhD diss., University of Virginia, Virginia.
Jespersen, J. L., Albrechtslund, A., Øhrstrøm, P., Hasle, P. and Albretsen, J. 2007. Surveillance, persuasion and Panopticon. In Persuasive technology, eds. de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B. and Fogg, B. J., 109–120. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_15.
Jun, N. 2010. Toward an anarchist film theory: Reflections on the politics of cinema. Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies, 1: 140–161.
Kimmel, M. and Llewellyn, C. 2012. Homosexuality, gender nonconformity and the neoliberal state. Journal of Homosexuality 59(7): 1087–1094, https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.699865.
Lahiri, J. 2003. The Namesake. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Lim, D. 2007. Identity is at heart of immigrant experience. Los Angeles Times, 9 March. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2007/mar/09/entertainment/etnamesake9 on 11 April 2016.
Liszka, J. J. 1999. Moral competence: An integrated approach to the study of ethics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mani, B. 2012. Cinema/photo/novel: Intertextual readings of "The Namesake". In Naming Jhumpa Lahiri: Canons and controversies, eds. Dhingra, L. and Cheung, F., 75–96. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
McWhorter, L. 2013. Post-liberation feminism and practices of freedom. Foucault Studies 16: 54–73, https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i16.4117.
Mohan, R. and Arora, M. K. 2013. Post-9/11 citizenship in diaspora literature and film adaptations: A case study of "The Namesake". New Academia 2(2): 33–40.
________2014. "Under western eyes" revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs 40(1): 499–535.
Mohanty, C. T. 1984. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12(3): 333–358, https://doi.org/10.2307/302821.
Mungwini, P. 2012. "Surveillance and cultural panopticism": Situating Foucault in African modernities. South African Journal of Philosophy 31(2): 340–353, https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2012.10751780.
Nagajothi, N. 2013. Transposal from fiction to motion picture: Crafting Jhumpa Lahiri's "The Namesake" on celluloid. Language in India 13(3): 540–552.
Obama, B. 2015. Remarks by the president at the national medals of the arts and humanities awards ceremony. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/thepress-office/2015/09/11/remarks-president-national-medals-arts-and-humanitiesawards-ceremony on 16 November 2015.
Okihiro, G. Y. 2014. Margins and mainstreams: Asians in American history and culture. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Ong, A. 2006. Mutations in citizenship. Theory, Culture and Society 23(2–3): 499–505, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406064831.
Pande, A. 2012. Diversities in the Indian diaspora: Nature, implications, responses. Diaspora Studies 5(1): 96–101, https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2013.764127.
Reddy, V. 2013. Jhumpa Lahiri's feminist cosmopolitics and the transnational beauty assemblage. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 11(2): 29–59, https://doi.org/10.2979/meridians.11.2.29.
Rogin, M. 1984. Kiss me deadly: Communism, motherhood and Cold War movies. Representations 6: 1–36.
Singh, A. and Schmidt, P. 2000. Postcolonial theory and the United States: Race, ethnicity and literature. Mississippi, USA: University Press of Mississippi.
Spivak, G. C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
______1988. Can the subaltern speak?. In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, eds. Nelson, C. and Lawrence, G., 271–313. Illinois, USA: University of Illinois Press.
United States Department of State, Office of the Historian. The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act) [Data file]. Washington DC: United States Department of State. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/immigrationact.
Vertovec, S. 1997. Three meanings of diaspora, exemplified among South Asian religions. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 6(3): 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.1997.0010.