Point of View in Conrad’s Almayer’s Folly: A Stylistic Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine how point of view is signaled in Conrad’s Almayer’s Folly and how it is used to exercise control over the attitudes we have of characters and events in the story. Specifically, it aims to examine who sees and who speaks in the story, whose views or ideas are being expressed as well as how characters and events are represented. As regards the characters, the focus will be on the representation of the white European self vis-a-vis the native Other. In achieving this aim, the study will utilise Halliday’s transitivity system, Fowler’s point of view model and Said’s Orientalism or discourse of Othering. Findings reveal that the features which indicate or control point of view include the system of deixis, vocabulary and transitivity structures, the use of modality as well as the various modes of speech and thought presentation. Almayer is the main focaliser in the text as the internal type of narration (narration within a character’s consciousness) is mostly accorded to him. Prolonged intrusions into Almayer’s mental faculties allow the reader to empathise with his victimised and helpless state and to distance the readers from the natives who have been depicted externally (narration from outside a character’s consciousness) in a most unsavoury manner. To some extent, an internal perspective is also accorded to the natives as it is through their perspectives that the white man’s duplicitous nature is revealed and the moral justifications for empire questioned. These are moments when Conrad registers his ambivalence towards the colonial project and empire, however his attempts are not fully realised as he invariably gets pulled back into the time-worn discourse of Othering in his representations of the Other.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Achebe, C. 1988. An image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”. In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, ed. R. Kimbrough, 251–262. New York: Norton.
Baklouti, S. and Fontaine, L. (eds). 2018. Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877
Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., Pollitt, A. and Williams, J. (eds). 1994. Language and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baines, J. 1960. Joseph Conrad: A critical biography. London: Weidenfield Nicholson.
Carter, R. and Simpson, P. 1989. Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London: Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203396711
Conrad, J. 1976. Almayer’s folly. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. First published 1895.
Dabashi, H. 2018. Edward Said’s Orientalism: Forty years later. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/edward-orientalism-forty-years-180503071416782.html (accessed 6 October 2018).
Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Johnson, J. 1995. Reconstructing racism: An author at a crossroads. PhD dissertation, Queen’s University at Kingston, Canada.
Karl, F.R. 1979. Joseph Conrad: The three lives. London: Faber & Faber.
Knowles M. and Malmkjaer, K. 1996. Language and control in children’s literature. London: Routledge.
Leech, G. and Short, M. 1981. Style in fiction. London: Longman.
Knight, D. 1987. Structuralism 1: Narratology, Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness. In Literary theory at work: Three texts, ed. D. Tallack, 9–28. London: Batsford Ltd.
Lothe, J. 1989. Conrad’s narrative method. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mills, S. 1991. Discourses of difference: An analysis of women’s travel writing and colonialism. London: Routledge.
Murray, D. 1987. Dialogics. In Literary theory at work: Three texts, ed. D. Tallack, 115– 134. London: Batsford Ltd.
Najder, Z. 1983. Joseph Conrad: A chronicle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Onishi, J. 2017. Conrad’s pronoun usage as a stylistic marker and its relation to his density of text and themes. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Tyler, United States.
Parry, B. 1983. Conrad and imperialism: Ideological boundaries and visionary frontiers. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04826-7
Pascal, R. 1977. The dual voice. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 2002. Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Routledge.
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
. 1994. Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Senn. W. 2017. Conrad’s narrative voice: Stylistic aspects of his fiction. Amsterdam: Brill/ Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004339835
Shakila Abdul Manan. 2002. Characterisation and transitivity: A stylistic analysis of Conrad’s Almayer. South East Asian Review of English, Journal of the Malaysian Association for Commonwealth Literature and Language Studies (MACLALS), 44(1): 1–15.
. 2011. Language and control: A stylistic analysis of selected works of Conrad. In Essays in honour of Professor Dato’ Md Salleh Yaapar, ed. Lalita Sinha, 274–291. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Sherry, N. 1966. Conrad’s eastern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shohat, E. and Stam, R. 1994. Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the media. London: Routledge.
Short, M. 1994. Understanding texts: Point of view. In Language and understanding, eds. G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, A. Pollitt and J. Williams, 170–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simpson, P. 1993. Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612
. 2004. Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496589
. 2014. Stylistics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Simpson, P. and Montgomery, M. 1995. Language, literature and film: The stylistics of Bernard Maclavety’s Cal. In Twentieth-century fiction: From text to context, eds. P. Verdonk and J.J. Weber, 138–165. London: Routledge.
Solly, M. 2017. The stylistics of professional discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sorlin, S. 2014. The indisciplinarity of stylistics. Topics in Linguistics 14(1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2014-0008
Stephens, J. 1992. Language and ideology in children’s fiction. London: Longman.
Stubbs, M. 2005. Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and literature: Journal of the Poetics and Linguistics Association 14(1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005048873
Svensson, M. 2010. Critical responses to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:356589/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 26 October 2018).
Szczeszak-Brewer, A. (ed.). 2015. Critical approaches to Joseph Conrad. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv6wgch4
Tallack, D. (ed). 1987. Literary theory at work: Three texts. London: Batsford Ltd.
Thompson, J.B. 1990. Ideology and modern culture: Critical and social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Toolan, M. 1988. Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.
Uspensky, B. 1973. A poetics of composition (Trans. by V. Zavarin and S. Wittig). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Verdonk, P. and Weber, J.J. (eds.). 1995. Twentieth-century fiction: From text to context. London: Routledge. Verdonk, P. 2002. Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wales, K. 1989. A dictionary of stylistics. London: Longman. . 2014. A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
Watts, C. 1989. Joseph Conrad: A literary life. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19775-0
Zawiah Yahya. 1994. Resisting colonial discourse. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.