Linguistic Features Differences in Arabic Textbooks Used at Islamic Schools in Malaysia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The dearth of studies that assess linguistic differences in Arabic textbooks is the motivation for the present study, which identified significant differences in the use of linguistic features in textbooks for different secondary school levels. The study analysed 315 samples of 100-word texts, randomly selected from 105 Arabic textbooks used at Islamic secondary schools in Malaysia. Seven linguistic features were analysed using descriptive and inferential analyses through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis showed a moderate use of simple sentences, complex sentences and noun sentences. However, the use of complex sentences was higher than that of simple sentences. There were a high number of common and frequent words used, but the use of abstract words was low. Conjunctions and discourse markers were used at moderate levels. ANOVA analysis showed significant differences in the use of complex sentences, common and frequent words, conjunctions and discourse markers, and sentence length averages. The study also found that long sentences are higher in frequency in Form 3 textbooks compared to those in Forms 4 and 5 textbooks. The current study suggests that the frequency of linguistic features should correspond to students’ needs by taking into their school level, Arabic language proficiency and subject content.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ab Halim Mohamad. 2002. Pembelajaran frasa bahasa Arab di kalangan pelajar Melayu: Satu analisis kesalahan. PhD diss., Universiti Malaya.
Abdul Hakim Abdullah. 2003. Pengajaran balaghah di peringkat STPM di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama (SMKA): Pelaksanaan dan permasalahannya. PhD diss., Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ahmad Sabri Noh. 2016. Ciri-ciri linguistik dalam kebolehbacaan buku teks berbahasa Arab untuk pelajar bukan penutur jati. PhD diss., Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ainon Wazir. 2004. Faktor-faktor pembelajaran yang mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar BAK: Satu kajian di SMKA Maahad Hamidiah, Kajang. MA diss., Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
al-Ajlan, A.A., al-Khalifa, H.S. and al-Salman, A.M.S. 2008. Towards the development of an automatic readability measurements for Arabic language. In 2008 Third international conference on digital information management, 506–511. London: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746711
al-Heeti, K.N. 1984. Judgment analysis technique applied to readability prediction of Arabic reading material. PhD diss., University of Northern Colorado.
al-Jumbulati, c Ali and al-Tawanisi, Abu al-Futuh. n.d. Al-usul al-hadithah li tadris allughah al-c Arabiyyahwa al-tarbiah al-diniyyah. Cairo: Dar NahdahMisr.
al-Khalifa, H.S. and al-Ajlan, A.A. 2010. Automatic readability measurements of the Arabic text: An exploratory study. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 35(2C): 103–124.
al-Saif, Amal and Markert, K. 2011. Modelling discourse relations for Arabic. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Edinburgh: Association for Computational Linguistics, 736–747.
al-Tamimi, A.-K., Jaradat, M., Aljarrah, N. and Ghanem, S. 2014. AARI: Automatic Arabic Readability Index. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology 11(4): 370–378.
Altbach, P.G. 1983. Key issues of textbook provision in the third world. Prospects 13(3): 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220426
Azhar Muhammad, Abdul Hafiz Abdullah, Bushrah Basiron, Kamarul Azmi Jasmi and Sulaiman Shakib Mohd Noor. 2006. Penguasaan pelajar sekolah menengah aliran agama terhadap pengajian ilmu retorik (balaghah) Arab. Unpublished project report, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Azharudin Ahmad Azhar. 2005. Penggunaan buku teks dalam pengajaran bahasa Arab di sekolah agama: Satu kajian kes. MA diss., Universiti Malaya.
Badi, K.G. 1982. Tahdid ‘awamil al-suhulah wa al-su‘ubah fi al-maddah al-maqruah lada talamiz al-marhalah al-ibtidaiyyah. PhD diss., University Ain Shams.
Cavalli-Sforza, V., El Mezouar, M. and Saddiki, H. 2014. Matching an Arabic text to a learners’ curriculum. Morocco: University Ifrane.
Chall, J.S. 1974. Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Essex, England: Bowker Publishing Company.
Cicchetti, D.V. 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 6(4): 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Coleman, E.B. 1962. Improving comprehensibility by shortening sentences. Journal of Applied Psychology 46(2): 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039740
Combs, B. 2009. Mengajar secara efektif. Translated by Siti Aishah Mohd Elias. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Bhd.
Crossley, S.A., Greenfield, J. and McNamara, D.S. 2008. Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly 42(3): 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x
Dale, E. and Chall, J.S. 1948. A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin 27(1): 11–20.
Dawood, B.A.K. 1977. The relationship between readability and selected language variables [in Arabic]. MA diss., Iraq Baghdad University
Davison, A. and Kantor, R.N. 1982. On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly 17(2): 187–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/747483
Drews-Bryan, A. and Schleifer, L. 1993. A note on readability accounting textbook passages and corresponding GAAP. Accounting and Finance December: 24–40.
DuBay, W.H. 2004. The principles of readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information.
Durayhim, N.A. 1998. Mada tawaffur khasa’is al-inqira’iyyah wa al-nas al-jayyid al-‘ic dad fi nusus kitab al-qira’ah fi al-lughah al-injiliziyyah li al-saf al-thani li al-banat wa mada mac rifah al-muc allimat bi hazihi al-khasa’is. MEd. diss., King Saud University.
English, H.B. and English, A.C. 1958. A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytical terms. London: Longmans, Green.
Flesch, R. 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32(3): 221– 233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P. and Borg, W.R. 2003. Educational research: An introduction. 7th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gilliland, J. 1972. Readability. London: University of London Press.
Grabe, W. and Stoller, F.L. 2002. Teaching and researching reading. London: Pearson Education.
Gray, W.S. and Leary, B.E. 1935. What makes a book readable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gunning, T.G. 2003. The role of readability in today’s classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders 23(3): 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200307000-00005
Haris Md Jadi. 1991. Reformasi kurikulum di Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan 11(1): 1–15.
Harris, T.L. and Hodges, R.E. 1995. The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Harrison, C. 1980. Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_______1977. Investigating the readability of texts. Research Intelligence 3(1): 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192770030116
Holsti, O.R. 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Philippines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Hunt, K.W. 1970. Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 35(1): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165818
Ishak Mohd Rejab. 1993. Masalah pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa Arab di Malaysia. In Pendidikan Islam Malaysia, ed. Ismail Abdul Rahman, 225–245. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Istilah Pendidikan. 1988. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.
Janan, D. 2011. Towards a new model of readability. PhD diss., University of Warwick.
Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani. 2011. Kebolehbacaan buku teks Bahasa Arab Tinggi berasaskan ujian kloz dalam kalangan pelajar di SMKA. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies 11(2): 53–66.
_______2010. Kebolehbacaan buku teks Bahasa Arab Tinggi Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama. PhD diss., Universiti Malaya.
Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani, Ahmad Sabri Noh and Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff. 2017. Ciri-ciri lnguistik dalam buku teks berbahasa Arab dan hubungannya dengan tahap kebolehbacaan teks di Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 17(3): 152–166. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-10
_______2014. Linguistic features for development of Arabic text readability formula in Malaysia: A preliminary study. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 19(3): 319–331.
Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani and Hassan Basri Awang Mat Dahan. 2009. Mustawa maqru´iyyah al-kitab al-madrasiy li maddah al-lughah al-’Arabiyyah al-’aliyahlissaf al-rabi’ wa ’alaqatuhu bi hamasah al-tullab fi al-madaris al-thanawiyyah alqaumiyyah al-diniyyah: Tahlil syamil. Magazine of the Faculty of Education 69: 445–474.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2006. Panduan pengurusan Skim Pinjaman Buku Teks. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Khadijah Rohani Md Yunus. 1989. Formula kebolehbacaan: Satu cara objektif untuk menentukan tahap kebolehbacaan bahan-bahan bacaan. Jurnal Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa 31(4): 274–288.
_______1982. An assessment of the structure variables in Malay: A readability formulae. PhD diss., The University of Miami.
Kintsch, W. and Miller, J.R. 1981. Readability: A view from cognitive psychology. In Teaching research reviews. Neward, DE: International Reading Association.
Klare, G.R. 1969. The measurement of readability. 3rd Ed. Iowa: Iowa States University Press.
Koda, K. 2005. Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841
Krippendorff, K. 2009. Inferring the readability of text. In The content analysis reader, eds. K. Krippendorff and M.A. Bock, 202–208. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
_______2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Limage, L. 2005. The political economy of textbooks and literacy. 2006/ED/EFA/ MRT/PI/53. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001460/146060e.pdf (accessed 20 January 2009).
Meyer, B.J.F. 2003. Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders 23(3): 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200307000-00007
Miller, G.A. and Selfridge, J.A. 1950. Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. American Journal of Psychology 63: 85–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418920
Oakland, T. and Lane, H.B. 2004. Language, reading, and readability formulas: Implications for developing and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing 4(3): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt04033
Pang, J. 2008. Research on good and poor reader characteristics: Implications for L2 reading research in China. Reading in a Foreign Language 20(1): 1–18.
Pikulski, J.J. 2002. Readability. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Pintrich, P.R. 1999. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 31(6): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
Rumelhart, D.E. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. Attention and Performance 6: 573–603.
Rye, J. 1982. Cloze procedure and the teaching of reading. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Schwarm, S.E. and Ostendorf, M. 2005. Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05). Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics, 523–530.
Sharifah Alwiah Alsagoff. 1984. Teknologi pengajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Sherman, L.A. 1893. Analytics of literature: A manual for the objective study of English prose and poetry. Boston: Ginn & Company.
Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86(2): 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
Tay, M.G. 2005. Reading readability. Journal of Research MPBL 6: 23–34.
Toc iemah, R.A. 1978. The use of cloze to measure the proficiency of students of Arabic as a second language in some universities in the United States. PhD diss., University of Minnesota.
Tuc aymah, R.A. and al-Thuc aybi, M.c A. 2006. Tac lim al-qira’ah wa al-adab: Istiratijiyyah mukhtalifah li jumhur mutanawwic . Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-c Arabi.
Yahya Othman. 2003. Mengajar membaca: Teori dan aplikasi. Pahang, Malaysia: PTS Publications and Distributor Sdn. Bhd.
Yngve, V.H. 1961. The depth hypothesis. In Proceedings of symposia in applied mathematics, ed. R. Jakobson, Vol. 12, 130–138. Rhode Island, USA: American Mathematical Society.
Zulazhan Ab Halim. 2012. Kebolehbacaan buku teks Balaghah Sijil Tinggi Agama Malaysia di sekolah-sekolah menengah agama negeri. PhD diss., Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.