Manikam Kalbu and Nusantara Women: An Inquiry into Regional Female Expertise and Knowledge

Main Article Content

Nur Dayana Mohamed Ariffin

Abstract

What was the role of women as gatekeepers and users of technology before its modernisation and institutionalisation in Nusantara? How were they custodians of specific knowledge formed in and around the Malay world? There is no adequate amount of information in the archives for these questions to be answered sufficiently, but in Manikam Kalbu, Faisal Tehrani’s novel about two Malay seamsters set in a parallel period—the Malaccan sultanate in the 16th century and Malaysia in the 20th century—elicits the profound mastery of the material, tools, and art of sewing and craftsmanship by female characters who were depicted as caretakers of traditional knowledge and gatekeepers of their respective craft. Such depictions are either skewed or non-existent in Malay or Indonesian historiography, as many historical narratives are male-centric or focused on the political participation or domestic roles of women as wives and mothers. This study aims to uncover traces of historical reality from Faisal Tehrani’s fictional world as a means to fill the gap in historical literature and paint a critical and often absent picture of women in Nusantara, their expertise, their knowledge and the continuities of traditional and indigenous knowledge.

Article Details

How to Cite
Manikam Kalbu and Nusantara Women: An Inquiry into Regional Female Expertise and Knowledge. (2023). KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21315/
Section
Articles

References

Adas, M. 2015. Machines as the measure of men: Science, technology and ideologies of western dominance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Ahmat Adam. 2013. Melayu, nationalisme radikal dan pembinaan bangsa. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Alatas, Syed Farid. 1993. On the indigenization of academic discourse. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 18(3): 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549301800303

Alatas, Syed Hussein. 2010. The myth of the lazy native: A study of the image of the Malays, Filipinos and Javanese from the 16th to the 20th century and its function in the ideology of colonial capitalism. New York/London: Routledge.

Albert, D.D.A. 2016. A review on the role of women in the traditional religion of the Dusun Lotud in Tuaran, Sabah. In Proceedings of 3rd KANITA Postgraduate International Conference on Gender Studies, 59–68. Pulau Pinang, Malaysia: Pusat Penyelidikan Wanita dan Gender (KANITA).

Andaya, B.W. 2007. Studying women and gender in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Asian Studies 4(1): 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147959140700054x

_____. 2006. The flaming womb: Repositioning women in early modern Southeast Asia. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Press.

Arba’iyah Mohd Noor. 2020. The transition of Malay women’s role and contribution in the early 20th century. Journal of Al-Tamaddun 15(1): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol15no1.5

Benston, M.L. 2005. Women’s voices/men’s voices: Technology as language. In Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch, ed. C. Kramarae, 12–22. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Brown, C.C., Roolvink, R., Tun Seri Lanang and Asiatic, R. 1970. Sejarah Melayu, or, the Malay annals. Oxford/London: Oxford University Press.

Bruchac, M.M. 2014. Indigenous knowledge and traditional knowledge. In Encyclopedia of global archaeology, ed. C. Smith, 3814–3824. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_10

Carroll, L.S.A. (2017). A comprehensive definition of technology from an ethological perspective. Social Sciences 6(4): 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040126

Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.

Chambers, D.W. and Gillespie, R. 2000. Locality in the history of science: Colonial science, technoscience and indigenous knowledge. Osiris 15: 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1086/649328

Cheah, B.K. 1993. Power behind the throne: The role of queens and court ladies in Malay history. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of Royal Asiatic Society 66(1): 1–21.

Evers, H.-D. 2016. Nusantara: History of a concept. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 89(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2016.0004

Faisal Tehrani. 2007. Manikam Kalbu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Fountain, J.E. 2000. Constructing the information society: Women, information technology and design. Technology in Society 22(1): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-791x(99)00036-6

Fox, E. and Longino, H.E. 1996. Feminism and science. Oxford/London: Oxford University Press.

Harrisson, T. 1970. The Malays of south-west Sarawak before Malaysia: E socio-ecological study. London: Macmillan.

Hijjas, M. 2011. Victorious wives: The disguised heroine in 19th-century Malay syair. Singapore: NUS Press.

Hirschman, C. 2016. Gender, the status of women, and family structure in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 53(1): 33–50.

Hofstede, G. and Bond, M.H. 1988. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics 16(4): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5

Howard, P. 2003. The major importance of “minor” resources: Women and plant biodiversity. In Gatekeeper series no. 112. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Retrieved from https://pubs.iied.org/9282iied

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2016. Rural development report. Gender equality and women’s empowerment. Retrieved from https://www.ifad.org/documents/30600024/9cc7a558-a038-4630-a5fc-bdf00c881a33

Iskandar, P. 2016. The pancasila delusion. SSRN Electronic Journal 46(4). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589385

Kramarae, C. 1988. Gotta go Myrtle, technology’s at the door. In Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch, 1–11. New York/London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Lajiman Janoory. 2019. Malay women in colonial texts. Perak, Malaysia: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Press.

Low, H. 1848. Sarawak: Its inhabitants and productions; Being notes during a residence in that country with the Rajah Brooke. London: Richard Bentley.

Mahani Musa. 1998. Kaum wanita di zaman kesultanan Melayu Melaka: Antara Batasan tradisi dan realiti. SEJARAH 6(6): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.22452/sejarah.vol6no6.1

Maznah Mohamad. 1996. The Malay handloom weavers: A study of the rise and decline of traditional manufacture. Singapore: Regional Social and Cultural Studies, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Mazzocchi, F. 2006. Western science and traditional knowledge: Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO Reports 7(5): 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400693

Montanari, B. and Bergh, S.I. 2019. Why women’s traditional knowledge matters in the production processes of natural product development: The case of the Green Morocco Plan. Women’s Studies International Forum 77: 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102275

Ngoi, G.P. 2017. Editorial introduction: The pluralistic thoughts and imagined boundaries in Nusantara. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 18(3): 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1353399

Nor Hafizah Selamat and Noraida Endut. 2020. “Bargaining with patriarchy” and entrepreneurship: Narratives of Malay Muslim women entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia 38(Supp. 1): 11–31. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2020.38.s1.2

Od. M. Anwar. 2016. Contextualizing Nusantara studies. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) 1(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol1iss1pp1-6

Pires, T. and Cortesão, A. 1944. The Suma oriental of Tomé Pires and the book of Francisco Rodrigues. London: Hakluyt Society.

Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 2010. The history of Java, Vol. 1. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1817.

Reid, A. 1988. Female roles in pre-colonial Southeast Asia. Modern Asian Studies 22(3): 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x00009720

Schauer, M.J. 2017. Industrious women and lost traditions: Gender, imperial exchange and handicrafts education in British Malaya and the American Philippines, 1900–1940. Journal of World History 28(3–4): 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2017.0040

Schiebinger, L. 2005. Forum introduction: The European colonial science complex. Isis 96(1): 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/430677

Sinthumule, N.I. and Mashau, M.L. 2020. Traditional ecological knowledge and practices for forest conservation in Thathe Vondo in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Global Ecology and Conservation 22: e00910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00910

Siti Zainon Ismail. 1997. Tekstil tenunan Melayu: Keindahan budaya tradisional Nusantara. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Srimulyani, E. 2012. Women from traditional Islamic educational institutions in Indonesia: Negotiating public spaces. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Syahrir, E. 2016. Ungkapan pantang larang masyarakat Melayu Belantik. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 7(2): 237–250.

Wiesner, M.E. 2022. Gender in history: Global perspectives. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Wyer, M. 2014. Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science studies. Edited by M. Barbecheck, D. Geisman, H.Ö. Öztürk and M. Wayne. London/New York: Routledge.

Zidny, R., Sjöström, J. and Eilks, I. (2021). Correction to: A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science and Education 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00194-2