Gender Differences in Language Use in Talks at Google
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the linguistic features utilised by male and female native English speakers during their Talks at Google using Lakoff and Lakoff’s framework of women’s language. The analysis is conducted on a sample of 14 videos, consisting of seven for each gender, using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative analysis presents the frequencies of the utterances used by the speakers, while the qualitative analysis identifies the language forms employed by each gender. The findings reveal that both genders employed the linguistic features suggested by Lakoff in their talks. Contrary to Lakoff and Lakoff’s assumptions, the female speakers utilised fewer linguistic features, accounting for only 47.43% of the features present in the corpus. Specifically, female speakers used intensifiers, tag questions and humour more frequently than male speakers, while male speakers employed empty adjectives, hedges, hypercorrect grammar and super polite forms more often than female speakers. The results provide insights into the language usage patterns of each gender and allude to possible changes in women’s use of linguistic patterns.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmad, Kamarul Zaman. 2014. Gender differences and work-related communication in the UAE: A qualitative study. International Journal of Business and Management 9(3): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p185
Alghazo, Sharif, Al Salem, Mohd Nour, Alrashdan, Imran and Rabab’ah, Ghaleb. 2021. Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon 7(11): e08463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463
Alshboul, Asia, Jarrah, Marwan, Alghazo, Sharif and Al-Shawashreh, Ekab. 2022. A sociolinguistic analysis of intensifiers in Ammani Arabic. Ampersand 9: Article100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100086
Asl, M.P. 2020. Spaces of change: Arab women’s reconfigurations of selfhood through heterotopias in Manal al-Sharif’s Daring to Drive. KEMANUSIAAN the Asian Journal of Humanities 27(2): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2020.27.2.7
Banikalef, Ala’Eddin Abdullah Ahmed. 2019. The impact of culture and gender on the production of online speech acts among Jordanian Facebook users. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 19(2): 399–414. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.19.2.9
Benyakoub, Nour El Houda, Alghazo, Sharif, Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib and Rabab’ah, Ghaleb. 2022. A cross-cultural analysis of disagreement strategies in Algerian and Jordanian Arabic. Kervan 26(1): 253–275. https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/6903
Brownlow, S., Rosamond, J.A. and Parker, J.A. 2003. Gender-linked linguistic behavior in television interviews. Sex Roles 49(3): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024404812972
Carli, L.L. 1990. Gender, language, and influence. Journal of personality and social psychology 59(5): 941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941
Coates, J. 2015. Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835778
Dawood, Milad Mohammed, Alghazo, Sharif and Jarrah, Marwan. 2023. Effects of gender and degree of formality on the use of euphemistic strategies in Iraqi Arabic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(414): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01876-8
Fishman, P.M. 1978. Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems 25(4): 397–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/800492
Haas, A. 1979. Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616
Hobbs, P. 2003. The medium is the message: Politeness strategies in men’s and women’s voice mail messages. Journal of Pragmatics 35(2): 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00100-5
Holmes, J. 2013. An introduction to sociolinguistics. 4th Ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057
. 1986. Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society 15(1): 1–21.
Khoirot, A.U., Rohmah, Z. and Puspitasari, D. 2016. Women’s linguistic features in two dramas. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching 7(1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2016.7.1.49-64
Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2(1): 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
Lakoff, R. and Lakoff, R.T. 2004. Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries. Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leaper, C. and Robnett, R.D. 2011. Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren’t they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psychology of Women Quarterly 35(1): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310392728
Li, X. and Li, F. 2020. Gender difference in hedging: A corpus-based study to TED Talks about emotion. Creative Education 11(10): 2106. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110153
McMillan, J.R., Clifton, A.K., McGrath, D. and Gale, W.S. 1977. Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles 3(6): 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287838
Nemati, A. and Bayer, J.M. 2007. Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: A comparative study of Persian and English. Language in India 7(9): 1–16.
Plug, I., Stommel, W., Lucassen, P.L.B.J., olde Hartman, T.C., van Dulmen, S. and Das, E. 2021. Do women and men use language differently in spoken face-to-face interaction? A scoping review. Review of Communication Research 9: 43–79.
Rabab’ah, Bayan and Rabab’ah, Ghaleb. 2021. The impact of culture and gender on impoliteness strategies in Jordanian and American TV sitcoms. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 11(2): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.06
Rabab’ah, Bayan, Rabab’ah, Ghaleb and Naimi, Tasnim. 2019. Oprah Winfrey Talk Show: An analysis of the relationship between positive politeness strategies and speaker’s ethnic background. KEMANUSIAAN the Asian Journal of Humanities 26(1): 25–50. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2019.26.1.2
Rabab’ah, Ghaleb and Abuseileek, Ali Farhan. 2012. The pragmatic functions of repetition in TV discourse. Research in Language 10(4): 445–460. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0004-x
Rabab’ah, Ghaleb, Idir, L. and Alghazo, Sharif. 2020. Persuasive appeals in Jordanian and Algerian telecommunication television commercials. Open Linguistics 6(1): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0021
Rabab’ah, Ghaleb, Jaser, Heba and Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib. 2022. The use of hedging devices by female Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of Humanities Education 20(1): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v20i01/81-96
Rabab’ah, Ghaleb, Rabab’ah, Bayan and Suleiman, Nour A. 2016. Instant messaging language in Jordanian female school students’ writing. Teaching English with Technology 16(2): 116–142.
Rahmawati, D. and Indrayani, L.M. 2019. Woman language features in Recode World’s Technology Conference: A sociolinguistic study. ELT-Lectura 6(2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v6i2.3122
Searle, J.R. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213
Sheridan, F. 2007. Gender, language and the workplace: An exploratory study. Women in Management Review 22(4): 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710754264
Talks at Google. n.d. Start exploring. Retrieved from https://talksat.withgoogle.com (accessed February 2022).
Tannen, D. 1994. Talking from 9 to 5: How women’s and men’s conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: William Morrow and Company.
. 1993. Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1990. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
Younes, Mohammad Bani, Smadi, Alaa’ M., AbuSeileek, Ali and Rabab’ah, Ghaleb. 2023. The influence of gender on EFL learners’ discourse functions in a CMC environment. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 23(2): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460
Zimmermann, D.H. and West, C. 1996. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 4: 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.125.12zim