“Musuh dari Gunung”: Penelitian Semula Terhadap Kedudukan Hizbul Muslimin dalam Sejarah Perjuangan Kemerdekaan Tanah Melayu “Enemy from the Mountain”: Re-Examination of the Position of Hizbul Muslimin in the Malaya’s History of Independence Struggle

Main Article Content

Abu Hanifah Haris

Abstract

Hizbul Muslimin (HM) is a movement often labelled as a “left-wing” and supporting the communist ideology. Several questions frequently arise in relation to HM, leading to inaccurate interpretations, like supporting the communist ideology and not fighting for independence and the arrest of their leaders due to the declaration of emergency, apart from being banned by the British. However, recent British records have led to the emergence of alternative views in answering the question. This study aims to re-examine HM’s position in Malaya’s history of independence struggle. A qualitative approach, using a library research method, was adopted by examining various primary sources and secondary sources. The findings indicate that the more appropriate label for HM is a religious movement that functioned as a middle movement and adopted a strategy of cooperating with “right-wing” and “left-wing” movements. HM also rejected the communist ideology; in fact, their cooperation with the communists was just to get rid of the British. The arrest of their leaders was a double-edged sword for the British to continue their colonialism in Malaya and curb the anti-British struggle. HM was also never banned, but was instead dissolved by its own leaders.


Hizbul Muslimin (HM) merupakan sebuah pertubuhan yang sering dilabel sebagai gerakan “kiri” dan menyokong ideologi komunis. Beberapa persoalan yang sering timbul berkaitan HM sehingga menimbulkan tafsiran yang kurang tepat adalah seperti menyokong ideologi komunis dan tidak memperjuangkan kemerdekaan serta penangkapan pemimpinnya yang disebabkan oleh pengisytiharan darurat, selain telah diharamkan oleh British. Namun demikian, bukti terkini daripada rekod British mengakibatkan kemunculan pandangan alternatif bagi menjawab persoalan tersebut. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk meneliti semula kedudukan HM dalam sejarah perjuangan kemerdekaan Tanah Melayu. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, iaitu kaedah kajian kepustakaan dengan meneliti pelbagai sumber primer dan sumber sekunder. Kajian menunjukkan bahawa HM lebih sesuai dilabel sebagai gerakan agama yang berfungsi sebagai gerakan tengah dan menggunakan strategi bekerjasama dengan gerakan “kanan” dan gerakan “kiri”. HM juga menolak ideologi komunis, bahkan kerjasama dengan komunis hanyalah satu bentuk strategi politik bagi menyingkirkan British. Penangkapan pemimpin HM pula merupakan serampang dua mata British bagi meneruskan kelangsungan penjajahan mereka di Tanah Melayu serta mengekang perjuangan anti-British. HM juga tidak pernah diharamkan, sebaliknya dibubarkan oleh pemimpin mereka sendiri.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Musuh dari Gunung”: Penelitian Semula Terhadap Kedudukan Hizbul Muslimin dalam Sejarah Perjuangan Kemerdekaan Tanah Melayu: “Enemy from the Mountain”: Re-Examination of the Position of Hizbul Muslimin in the Malaya’s History of Independence Struggle. (2025). KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities, 32(1), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2025.32.1.10
Section
Articles

References

Abdul Rahman Haji Ismail. 2009. 1948 and the Cold War in Malaya: Samplings of Malay reactions. Kajian Malaysia 27(1–2): 155–178.

Abu Hanifah Haris. 2018. Ulama dan Perjuangan Politik: Peranan Masyumi Terhadap Penubuhan Hizbul Muslimin di Tanah Melayu, 1947–1948. Jurnal Perspektif 10(3): 104–112.

_____. 2014. Reaksi British terhadap kegiatan Majlis Agama Tertinggi (MATA) dan Hizbul Muslimin di Tanah Melayu, 1948–1949. Malaysia dari Segi Sejarah 42: 38–56.

Ahmad Atory Hussain. 1998. Dari Berantakan Menuju Pembangunan Politik Melayu, 1990–2000. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.

Ahmat Adam. 2014. Melayu, nasionalisme radikal dan pembinaan bangsa. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Azmi Ariffin. 2019. Darurat atau “perang kolonial” 1948 di Tanah Melayu: Satu perbahasan berdasarkan beberapa aliran pemikiran dan perspektif. Kemanusiaan 26(2): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2019.26.2.3

_____. 2014. Local historians and the historiography of Malay nationalism 1945–57: The British, the United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and the Malay Left. Kajian Malaysia 32(1): 1–35.

CO 537/3751. 1948a. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 8/1948. 30 April. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1948b. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 7/1948. 15 April. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1948c. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 9/1948. 15 May. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

CO 537/3752. 1948a. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 10/1948. 31 May. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1948b. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 13/1948. 15 July. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

CO 537/3753. 1948a. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 14/1948. 31 July. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1948b. Malayan Security Service, political intelligence journal. No. 15/1948. 15 August. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

CO 537/3754. 1948. Pan-Malayan review of political and security intelligence. No. 1/1948. 1 September. Part I, political intelligence review. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

FO 371/76000. 1949a. Pan-Malayan review of political and security intelligence. No. 19/1949. 14 September. Part I, political intelligence review. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1949b. Pan-Malayan review of political and security intelligence. No. 20/1949, 28 September. Part I, political intelligence review. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

Hazman Baharom. 2021. Gerakan Islam dan cabaran demokrasi. In Wacana pemikiran reformis, ed. Ahmad Farouk Musa, vol. 3, 63–72. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Renaissance Front.

Hussain Yaakub. 2000. UMNO tidak relevan. Kuala Lumpur: Mariah binti Jaafar.

Ibnu Hasyim. 1993. PAS kuasai Malaysia?: 1950–2000, sejarah kebangkitan dan masa depan. Kuala Lumpur: GG Edar.

Ibrahim Chik. 2004. Memoir Ibrahim Chik: Dari API ke Rejimen ke-10. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Ishak Saat. 2011. Radikalisme Melayu Perak, 1945–1970. Pulau Pinang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Kamarul Afendey Hamimi and Ishak Saat. 2020. Kaum Muda di Tanah Melayu, 1906–1957. Perak, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Khoo, K.K. 2001. Malay society: Transformation and democratisation. Selangor, Malaysia: Pelanduk Publications.

Insun Sony Mustapha. 1999. Memoir Mustapha Hussain: Kebangkitan nasionalisme Melayu sebelum UMNO. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Mawarni Yahya. 1978/1979. Riwayat hidup al-Ustaz Haji Abu Bakar al-Baqir bin Haji Mohd Said (tokoh pejuang Islam). Academic project, Universiti Malaya.

Nabir Haji Abdullah. 1976. Maahad Il Ihya Assyariff Gunung Semanggol 1934–1959. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Ramlah Adam. 2019. Gerakan radikalisme di Malaysia (1938–1965). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

_____. 2004. Kemelut politik Semenanjung Tanah Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Russli Kamarudin. 1995. Perkembangan politik PAS di Kelantan: Suatu tinjauan. In Perkembangan dan perubahan sosio-politik Kelantan 1955–1995, ed. Mohamed Agus Yusoff, 129–148. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Saliha Hj. Hassan. 1986. Dr. Burhanuddin Al Helmi, 1911–1969. Jebat 14: 153–182.

Stockwell, A.J. 1979. British policy and Malay politics during the Malayan Union experiment. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (MBRAS).

Utusan Melayu. 1948a. 26 April. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.

_____. 1948b. 2 Ogos. Kuala Lumpur: Arkib Negara Malaysia.