Semantik Istilah Kaum Muda dan Kaum Tua dalam Wacana Pemikiran Melayu The Semantics of Kaum Muda and Kaum Tua in Malay Intellectual Discourse

Main Article Content

IBRAHIM MAJDI MOHAMAD KAMIL

Abstract

Abstract. This article examined the ideological contestation within Malay Muslim society through a semantic and critical discourse analysis of the terms Kaum Muda and Kaum Tua in William R. Roff’s seminal work, particularly the chapter “Kaum Muda–Kaum Tua: Innovation and Reaction” in The Origins of Malay Nationalism (1967). Adopting a qualitative approach that integrated historical analysis, content analysis and both contextual and critical semantics, the study investigated how these terms functioned as discursive tools to frame reformist and conservative ideologies. Findings revealed that Kaum Muda and Kaum Tua were not neutral descriptors but ideologically loaded categories that constructed perceptions of legitimacy, authority and modernity. Semantic field analysis identified overlapping and contested meanings within networks of related terms, including ijtihad, taqlid, tradition and progress, highlighting the dynamic nature of these labels. The study argued that Roff’s lexical choices reinforced a binary of “innovation” versus “reaction,” while also acknowledging ambiguities that complicated this dichotomy. By situating these terms within the colonial and postcolonial contexts, the article demonstrates their enduring relevance in contemporary debates on Malay Muslim identity and authority. This research contributes to linguistics and discourse studies by showing how language operates as a mechanism of power and ideology in shaping intellectual history and socio-political narratives.


Abstrak. Makalah ini meneliti pertentangan ideologi dalam masyarakat Melayu Muslim melalui analisis semantik dan wacana kritis terhadap istilah Kaum Muda dan Kaum Tua dalam karya William R. Roff, khususnya bab “Kaum Muda–Kaum Tua: Innovation and Reaction” dalam The Origins of Malay Nationalism (1967). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang menggabungkan analisis sejarah, kandungan dan semantik kontekstual serta kritis untuk memahami sejauh mana istilah ini berfungsi sebagai alat wacana dalam membingkai ideologi reformis dan konservatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa istilah Kaum Muda dan Kaum Tua bukan sekadar label neutral, tetapi kategori sarat ideologi yang membentuk persepsi tentang legitimasi, autoriti dan kemodenan. Analisis medan makna mengenal pasti pertindihan dan makna yang dipertandingkan dalam jaringan istilah seperti ijtihad, taklid, tradisi dan kemajuan, menonjolkan sifat dinamik istilah ini. Kajian ini berpendapat bahawa pilihan leksikal Roff mengukuhkan dikotomi “inovasi” berbanding “reaksi”, sambil mengakui ambiguiti yang mencabar pembacaan binari. Dengan meletakkan istilah ini dalam konteks kolonial dan pascakolonial, makalah ini menegaskan kerelevanan kesinambungan istilah tersebut dalam wacana kontemporari tentang identiti dan autoriti Melayu Muslim. Kajian ini menyumbang kepada bidang linguistik dan kajian wacana dengan menunjukkan sejauh mana bahasa berfungsi sebagai mekanisme kuasa dan ideologi dalam membentuk sejarah intelektual dan naratif sosio-politik.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Semantik Istilah Kaum Muda dan Kaum Tua dalam Wacana Pemikiran Melayu: The Semantics of Kaum Muda and Kaum Tua in Malay Intellectual Discourse. (2026). KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities, 33(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2026.33.2.1

References

Abdul Rahman Abdullah. 1997. Pemikiran Islam di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abdul Rahman Abdullah. 1987. Pemikiran Islam masa kini: Sejarah dan aliran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abdul Rahman Embong. 2002. State-led modernization and the new middle class in Malaysia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Benda, H.J. 1967. Review of the origins of Malay nationalism, by W.R. Roff. Journal of Asian Studies 26(4): 789–791.

Chandra Muzaffar. 1988. Kebangkitan semula Islam di Malaysia. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Fajar Bakti.

Cheah, B.K. 1983. Red star over Malaya: Resistance and social conflict during and after the Japanese occupation of Malaya, 1941–1946. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Cruse, D.A. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. 2015. Language and power. 3rd Ed. London: Routledge.

Faisal Hamid dan Faizuri Abdul Latif. 2013. Pemikiran Islam dalam Majalah Pengasuh: Satu analisis. Jurnal Usuluddin 37: 1–20.

Ibrahim Majdi Mohamad Kamil. 2025. Nationalism ideology in Malaysia Islamic movements. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences 28(1): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.24191/gading.v28i1.499

Ibrahim Majdi Mohamad Kamil, Nur Farhana Abdul Pazil, Mohamad Hilmi Mohamad Haled dan Azarudin Ibrahim. 2020. The fundamentals of the “Kaum Muda” and “Kaum Tua” ideology social movements in Malaysia 1970–2017. Psychology and Education 57(9): 2437–2443.

Jaffary Awang dan Kamarudin Salleh. 2007. Pemikiran Islam dan isu-isu semasa. 2nd Ed. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Jaffary Awang dan Kamarudin Salleh. 2000. Pemikiran Islam dan isu-isu semasa. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Kamarul Afendey Hamimi dan Ishak Saat. 2018. Kaum Muda penggerak kesedaran kemerdekaan Tanah Melayu 1906–1957. Perak, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Kassim Ahmad. 1984. Teori sosial moden Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Milner, A. 1982. Kerajaan: Malay political culture on the eve of colonial rule. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Mohamad Kamil. 1996. Gerakan Islah dan tradisionalisme Islam di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Mohamad Saleeh Rahamad. 2014. Oksidentalisme dalam sastera Melayu: Sebelum merdeka hingga era Mahathir Mohamad. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.

Ng, W.L. and Lee, K.T. 2024. How new media affecting cultural identity: Case studies from Malaysia. Scope: Journal of Communication Studies 4(2): 1349–1367. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15083743

Norshahril Saat. 2011. Islamising Malayness: Ulama discourse and authority in contemporary Malaysia. Contemporary Islam 6(2): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-011-0172-9

Pakpahan, S. 2023. Islam, ethnicity and the state: Identity politics in Malaysian public policy. Asia Pacific Journal on Religion and Society 7(2): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.24191/apjrs.v7i2.37344

Rajandran, K. and Lee, C., eds. 2023. Discursive approaches to politics in Malaysia: Legitimising governance. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5334-7

Roff, W.R. 1980. The origins of Malay nationalism. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Roff, W.R. 1967. The origins of Malay nationalism. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

Sarim Mustajab. 1988. Peranan penerbitan dalam penyebaran pemikiran Islam di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

The Guardian. 2013. Obituary: William R. Roff. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com (accessed 11 April 2025).

Van Dijk, T.A. 2015. Critical discourse analysis. In The handbook of discourse analysis, eds. D. Tannen, H.E. Hamilton and D. Schiffrin, 466–485. 2nd Ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

Yong, C.F. and McKenna, R.B. 1990. The Kuomintang movement in British Malaya 1912–1949. Singapore: Singapore University Press.