Mapping the Interactions Between Hummingbirds and Plants in a Region of the Colombian Andes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pollination is a key ecological process that ensures plant reproduction and supports the stability and biodiversity of natural ecosystems. In high Andean environments, hummingbirds act as essential pollinators due to their physiological adaptations that allow them to forage in extreme climatic conditions and at high elevations. However, the ongoing transformation of these ecosystems driven by deforestation, land-use change, and climate variability highlights the urgent need to understand the structure and resilience of pollination networks. In this study, we analyzed the interaction network between hummingbirds and ornithophilous plants in a remnant of Andean forest in southwestern Colombia. Interactions were documented through trail surveys, focal observations, and mist-netting over a three-year sampling period. We recorded 269 interactions between 10 hummingbird species and 28 plant species, achieving 95% sampling completeness. Network analysis revealed low specialization, intermediate modularity, and a predominance of generalist species, suggesting a relatively cohesive but potentially vulnerable system. These findings contribute valuable empirical evidence on how mutualistic interactions are structured in tropical montane forests and highlight the importance of preserving not only species richness but also the ecological interactions that sustain ecosystem function. This knowledge is essential for designing conservation and restoration strategies that enhance the resilience of high mountain ecosystems in the face of current and emerging threats.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Arcos L F S. (2009). Physionomic and structural characterization of a high Andean forest, in the Vereda el Cofre, Potrero del Rio farm, municipality of Totoró-Cauca. Undergraduate diss., Universidad del Cauca, Popayán.
Ayerbe-Quiñones F, López-Ordóñez J P, González-Rojas M F, Estela F A, Ramírez-Burbano M B, Sandoval-Sierra J V and Gómez-Berna L G. (2008). Aves del departamento del Cauca – Colombia. Biota Colombiana 9(1): 77–132.
Ayerbe-Quiñones F. (2018a). Guía de Avifauna Colombiana. Bogotá: Wildlife Conservation Society.
Ayerbe-Quiñones F. (2018b). Colibríes de Colombia. Serie: Avifauna Colombiana. Bogotá: Wildlife Conservation Society.
Bascompte J and Jordano P. (2007). Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818
Becoche-Mosquera J M, Gomez-Bernal L G, Zambrano-Gonzalez G and Angulo-Ortiz D. (2023). Unraveling plant-pollinator interactions from a south-west Andean forest in Colombia. PeerJ 11: 1–25. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16133
Blüthgen N, Fründ J, Vazquez D P and Menzel F. (2008). What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology 89(12): 3387–3399. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2121.1
Bugoni J, Maruyama P, Debastiani V, Duarte L, Dalsgaard B and Sazima M. (2016). Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a neotropical plant-hummingbird network. Journal of Animal Ecology 85: 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12459
Burbano J. (2013). ¿Co-evolución morfológica entre los picos de los colibríes y las corolas de las plantas? Revista Biocyt 6(20): 398–409. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20072082.2013.6.76112
Camargo D and Rangel O. (2015). Interacción colibrí – flor en tres remanentes de Bosque tropical seco (BST) del municipio de Chimichagua (Cesar, Colombia). Caldasia 37(1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v37n1.50812
CaraDonna P J, Petry W K, Brennan R M, Cunningham J L, Bronstein J L, Waser N M and Sanders N J. (2017). Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Ecology Letters 20(3): 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12740
Carranza-Quiceno J A, Castaño J H, Muriel-Ruiz S B, Maruyama P K and Armbrecht I. (2024). Forest loss and habitat changes reduce hummingbird functional diversity and the specialization of their interactions with plants in the tropical Andes. Global Ecology and Conservation 54: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03062
Chacoff N P, Vázquez D P, Lomáscolo S B, Stevani E L, Dorado J and Padrón B. (2012). Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant–pollinator network. Journal of Animal Ecology 81(1): 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01883.x
Chao A and Jost L. (2015). Estimating diversity and entropy profiles via discovery rates of new species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6(8): 873–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12349
Chao A, Ma K, Hsieh T and Chiu C. (2015). Online program SpadeR: Species-richness prediction and diversity estimation in R. http://chao.shinyapps.io/iNEXTOnline/ (accessed on 21 October 2024)
Crespo A, Aguilar J M, Pintado K and Tinoco B A. (2021). Key plant species to restore plant–hummingbird pollinator communities in the southern Andes of Ecuador. Restoration Ecology 30(4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13557
Dalsgaard B, González M, Olesen J, Timmermann A, Andersen L H and Ollerton J. (2008). Pollination networks and functional specialization: A test using Lesser Antillean plant-hummingbird assemblages. Oikos 117: 789–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16537.x
Dalsgaard B, Martin A, Olesen J, Ollerton J, Timmermann A, Andersen L and Tossas A. (2009). Plant–hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialization gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size. Oecologia 159: 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1255-z
Dáttilo W and Rico-Gray V. (2018). Ecological networks in the tropics. an integrative overview of species interactions from some of the most species-rich habitats on earth. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68228-0
Dormann F, Fründ J, Blüthgen N and Gruber B. (2009). Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecology Journal 2: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007
Dormann C F, Fruend J, Gruber B, Beckett S, Devoto M, Felix G M, Iriondo J M, Opsahl T, Pinheiro R, Strauss R and Velazquez D P. (2022). Package ‘bipartite’: Visualising bipartite networks and calculating some (ecological)iIndices V. 2.18. R Documentation.
Dunne J A, Williams R J and Martinez N D. (2002). Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(20): 12917–12922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192407699
Echeverry-Galvis M Á, Téllez-Colmenares N, Ramírez-Uribe L, Cortes-Cano J S, Estela F A and Rico-Guevara A. (2024). Potential effects of artificial feeders on hummingbird–plant interactions: Are generalizations yet possible? Ornitología Colombiana 34(2): 203–421. https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e576
Fenster C, Armbruster S, Wilson P, Dudash M and Thomson J. (2004). Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
García J and van der Hammen V. (2007). Atlas de páramos de Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
García Q A and Isada A P. (2013). Effects of migrations on the nestedness structure of bird assemblages in cays of the Jardines de la Reina archipelago, Cuba. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 37(2): 127–139. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2014.37.0127
González F. (2011). Métodos para contar aves terrestres. In D Tessaro and C González (eds.). Manual de técnicas para el estudio de la fauna. Querétaro, México: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro - Instituto Nacional de Ecología, 128–147.
González F and Loiselle B. (2016). Species interaction in an Andean bird-flowering plant network: Phenology is more important than abundance or morphology. PeerJ 4: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2789
Gutiérrez A and Rojas S. (2001). Dinámica anual de la interacción colibrí–flor en ecosistemas andinos del volcán Galeras, sur de Colombia. Undergraduate diss., Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.
Holdridge L. (1974). Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105(2727): 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.105.2727.367
IAvH. (2012). Proyecto: actualización de Atlas de Páramos de Colombia. Convenio Interadministrativo de Asociación 11-103 [Project: Update of the Colombian Páramos Atlas. Inter-administrative Association Agreement 11-103]. Bogotá, D.C.: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt y Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Recuperado de http://biblioteca.humboldt.org.co/images/pdf/CartografiaParamos/1-Mapa%20General-Horizontal.pdf
IDEAM. (2023). Sistema de Monitoreo de Bosques y Carbono para Colombia. Bogotá, D.C.: Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM). https://www.ideam.gov.co/sala-de-prensa/informes/Informe-anual-del-monitoreo-de-bosque-y-la-deforestacion
Lara N, Díaz R, Martínez V, López E, Díaz S, Valle O, Fisher A, Lara C and Ortiz R. (2012). Redes de interacción colibrí–planta del centro–este de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83: 569–577. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2012.2.965
Leimberger K, Dalsgaard J, Tobias J, Wolf C and Betts M. (2022). The evolution, ecology and conservation of hummingbirds and their interactions with flowering plants. Biological Reviews 97: 1476–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12828
Leimberger K G, Hadley A S and Betts M G. (2023). Plant–hummingbird pollination networks exhibit limited rewiring after experimental removal of a locally abundant plant species. Journal of Animal Ecology 92(9): 1680–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13935
López-Flores A I, Rodríguez-Flores C I, Arizmendi M D C, Rosas-Guerrero V and Almazán-Núñez R C. (2024). Shade coffee plantations favor specialization, decrease robustness and increase foraging in hummingbird–plant networks. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 22(1): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.10.005
Luna U, Lara C, Corcuera P and Valverde P. (2018). Efecto del tamaño corporal y distancia evolutiva en las interacciones agonísticas de colibríes (Trochilidae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 89(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2018.1.1876
Madriñán S, Cortés A J and Richardson J E. (2013). Páramo is the world's fastest evolving and coolest biodiversity hotspot. Frontiers in Genetics 4: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00192
Maruyama P K, Sonne J, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Martín González A M, Zanata T B, Abrahamczyk S, Alarcón R, Araujo A C, Araújo F P, Baquero A C, et al. (2018). Functional diversity mediates macroecological variation in plant–hummingbird interaction networks. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27(11): 1186–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12776
McGuire J, Witt C, Remsen J, Dudley R and Altshuler D. (2009). A higher-level taxonomy for hummingbirds. Journal of Ornithology 150: 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0330-x
Medel R, Aizen A and Zamora R. (2009). Ecología y evolución de interacciones planta-animal. Santiago de Chile: Universitaria. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1160.5761
Moreno D, Camargo D and Rosero L. (2014). Ciclo anual de una comunidad de colibríes (Trochilidae) en bosques andinos intactos y paramizados en la Cordillera Oriental de Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana 14: 28–47.
Moreno Villamil R, Vélez Velandia D, Gómez Hoyos A J, Higuera Díaz D, Carvajal González J, López Vargas C M and Melo D (eds.) (2018). Iniciativa Colombiana de Polinizadores. Bogotá, D.C.: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Iniciativa-Colombiana-de-Polinizadores.pdf
Muñoz E. (2018). Protocolo de acetólisis: plantas, abejas y colibríes. Unidad de Microscopia Electrónica, Universidad del Cauca.
Olesen J, Bascompte J, Dupont Y and Jordano P. (2007). The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 19891–19896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104
Patefield W M. (1981). Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating RxC tables with given row and column totals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 30(1): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346669
Ramírez M, Sandoval J and Gómez L. (2007). Uso de recursos florales por el zamarrito multicolor Eriocnemis mirabilis (Trochilidae) en el Parque Nacional Natural Munchique, Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana 5: 64–77. https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e144
Ramírez M, Gary F, Gonzales C, Amorim F and Maruyama P. (2017). The role of the endemic and critically endangered colorful puffleg Eriocnemis mirabilis in plant-hummingbird networks of the Colombian Andes. Biotropica 49(4): 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12442
Ramírez M, Amorim F, Marina A, Gonzalez T, Sonne J and Maruyama P. (2022). Nectar provision attracts hummingbirds and connects interaction networks across habitats. IBIS International Journal of Avian Science: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12988
Rangel-Ch J O. (2015). The biodiversity of Colombia: meaning and regional distribution. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 39: 176–200. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.136
Rocca M and Sazima M. (2010). Beyond hummingbird-flowers: The other side of ornithophily in the Neotropics. Oecologia Australis 14(1): 67–99. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2010.1401.03
Rodríguez C and Stiles G. (2005). Análisis ecomorfológico de una comunidad de colibríes ermitaños (Trochilidae, Phaethorninae) y sus flores en la Amazonia colombiana. Ornitología Colombiana 3: 7–27.
Sánchez M E, Llambí L D, Gámez L E, Rodríguez G, Pelayo R, Ataroff M and Vilanova E. (2024). Diversidad, estructura y dinámica de los bosques montanos tropicales: Perspectivas del monitoreo de parcelas permanentes en los Andes venezolanos. Ecosistemas Andinos 34(2): 1–16 https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.2.0.2349
Seckercioglu C. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Ecology and Evolution 21(8): 1–21. http:s//doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007
Sentíes-Aguilar E M, Martén-Rodríguez S, Huerta-Ramos G, Díaz-Infante S, López-Segoviano G, Aguirre-Jaimes A, Quesada-Avendaño M, Cortés-Flores J and Arizmendi M del C. (2024). Elevational and seasonal patterns of plant–hummingbird interactions in a high tropical mountain. Ecology and Evolution 14(10): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70469
Sonne J, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama P K, Araujo A C, Chávez-González E, Coelho A G, Cotton P A, Marín-Gómez O H, Lara C, Lasprilla L R et al (2020). Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant–hummingbird networks: morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287(1922): 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2873
Tinoco B, Graham C, Aguila J and Schleuning M. (2017). Effect of hummingbird morphology on specialization in pollination networks varies with resource availability. Oikos 126: 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02998
Toloza-Moreno D, León Camargo D A and Rosero L. (2014). El ciclo anual de una comunidad de colibríes (Trochilidae) en bosques altoandinos intactos y paramizados en la Cordillera Oriental de Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana 14(1): 1–20.
Vitali A, Vázquez D P, Miguel M F, Sasal Y and Rodríguez-Cabal M A. (2021). A keystone mutualism promotes resistance to invasion. Journal of Animal Ecology 90(11): 2717–2728. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13597
Vizentin J, Maruyama P and Sazima M. (2014). Processes entangling interactions in communities: Forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird–plant network. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2397