Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Composition to Three Different Ecosystem Functions: A Study Case in Malaysia

Main Article Content

Abdullah Muhaimin Mohammad Din
Wan Madihah Abd Halim
Sharifah Zulaikha Syed Ahmad
Salmah Yaakop

Abstract

Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) are sensitive towards habitat composition, change, and loss. This study was carried out to investigate the diversity of dung beetles in three forest ecosystems and the habitat association. Six sampling sites represented secondary forest (Bangi Reserve Forest [BRF] and Sungkai Reserve Forest, Sungkai), recreational forest (Langkawi Island, Langkawi and Fraser’s Hill [FH]) and wetland forest (Bera Lake [BL] and Chini Lake [CL]) have been chosen. A total of 15 pitfall traps were set up in three line transects rotten fish as bait. The dung beetles were collected in 24 h, 48 and 72 h. A total of 3,920 individuals with 40 species were successfully collected in which Sungkai has the highest collection followed by CL, BRF, FH, and Langkawi respectively. Based on the dendrogram, both wetlands site clustered together due to high similarity of species composition. BRF and Langkawi are also clustered together which may due to “island effect” occurred to BRF. In term of species composition and distribution, species from Clade 1 and 2 considered as less specific towards environment due to its presence in most ecosystems, while Clade 3 and 4 are more specific to certain ecosystem. In conclusion, besides dung beetles are used to measure ecosystem healthiness, it also can be specific to certain ecosystem types.


 


Kumbang najis (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) sensitif terhadap komposisi, perubahan dan kehilangan habitat. Kajian ini dijalankan bagi mengkaji kepelbagaian kumbang najis di tiga ekosistem hutan yang berbeza. Enam lokasi persampelan mewakili hutan sekunder (Hutan Simpan Bangi [BRF] dan Hutan Simpan Sungkai, Sungkai), hutan rekreasi (Pulau Langkawi, Langkawi dan Bukit Fraser [FH]) dan hutan tanah bencah (Tasik Bera [BL] dan Tasik Chini [CL]) telah dipilih. Sejumlah 15 perangkap lubang yang disusun di dalam tiga transek dengan menggunakan ikan busuk sebagai umpan telah dipasang. Sampel kumbang najis diambil dalam setiap 24, 48 dan 72 jam. Sejumlah 3,920 individu dengan 40 spesies telah berjaya dikumpulkan dengan Sungkai merekodkan jumlah tertinggi dan diikuti oleh CL, BRF, FH dan Langkawi. Berdasarkan dendrogram, kedua-dua kawasan tanah bencah dikumpulkan di dalam klad yang sama disebabkan kesamaan yang tinggi dalam komposisi spesies. BRF dan Langkawi juga berada dalam kumpulan yang sama yang mungkin disebabkan berlakunya “kesan pulau” terhadap BRF. Bagi komposisi spesies pula, Klad 1 dan 2 merupakan spesies yang umum yang kurang spesifik terhadap kebanyakkan ekosistem, manakala Klad 3 dan 4 lebih spesifik terhadap ekosistem tertentu. Kesimpulannya, selain kumbang najis digunakan bagi menentukan tahap kesihatan ekosistem, ia juga boleh menjadi spesifik kepada jenis ekosistem.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Composition to Three Different Ecosystem Functions: A Study Case in Malaysia. (2019). Tropical Life Sciences Research, 30(3), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2019.30.3.5
Section
Original Article

References

Aguilar-Amuchastegui N and Henebry G M. (2007). Assessing sustainability indicators for tropical forests: Spatio-temporal heterogeneity, logging intensity, and dung beetle communities. Forest Ecology and Management 253(1–3): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.004

Andresen E. (2005). Effects of season and vegetation type on community organization of dung beetles in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica 37(2): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00039.x

___. (2008). Dung beetle assemblages in primary forest and disturbed habitats in a tropical dry forest landscape in western Mexico. Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9100-y

Banerjee M. (2014). Diversity and composition of beetles (Order: Coleoptera) of Durgapur, West Bengal, India. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 2014: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/792746

Barlow J, Gardner T A, Araujo I S, Vila-Pires T C, Bonaldo A B, Costa J E, Esposito M C, Ferreira L V, Hawes J, Hernandez M I M, Hoogmoed M S, Leite R N, Lo-Man-Hung, N F, Malcolm J R, Martins M B, Mestre L A M, Miranda-Santos R and Nunes-G A L. (2007). Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104(47): 18555–18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104

Barragan F, Moreno C E, Escobar F, Halffter G and Navarrete D. (2011). Negative impacts of human land use on dung beetle functional diversity. PLoS One 6(3): e17976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017976

Braga R F, Korasaki V, Andresen E and Louzada J. (2013). Dung beetle community and functions along a habitat-disturbance gradient in the Amazon: A rapid assessment of ecological functions associated to biodiversity. PLoS One 8(2): e57786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057786

Davis A J. (2000). Does reduced-impact logging help preserve biodiversity in tropical rainforests? A case study from Borneo using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) as indicators. Community and Ecosystem Ecology 29(3): 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.467

Davis A J, Holloway J D, Huijbregts H, Krikken J, Kirk-Springgs A H and Sutton S L. (2001). Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forest of northern Borneo. Journal of Applied Ecology 38(3): 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00619.x

Doube B M. (1983). The habitat preference of some bovine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73(3): 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300008968

Edwards F A, Edwards P D, Larsen T H, Hsu W W, Benedick S, Chung A, Khen C V, Wilcove D S and Hamer K C. (2014). Does logging and forest conservation to oil palm agriculture alter functional diversity in a biodiversity hotspot? Animal Conservation 17(2): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12074

Ek-Amnuay P. (2008). Beetles of Thailand. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd.

Gardner T A, Barlow J, Chazdon R, Ewers R M, Harvey C A, Peres C A and Sodhi N S. (2009). Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters 12(6): 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x

Harvey C A, Gonzales J and Somarriba E. (2006). Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forests, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(2): 555–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2088-2

Horgan F G. (2005). Effects of deforestation on diversity, biomass and function of dung beetle on eastern slopes of the Peruvian Andes. Forest Ecology and Management 216(1–3): 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.049

Hosaka T, Niino M, Kon M, Ochi T, Yamada T, Fletcher C and Okuda T. (2014). Effects of logging road networks on the ecological functions of dung beetles in Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 326: 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.004

Irland L C, Adams D, Alig R, Betz C J, Chen C C, Hutchins M, McCarl B A, Skog K and Sohngen B L. (2001). Assessing socioeconomic impacts of climatic change on US forests, wood-product markets, and forest recreation. Bioscience 51(9): 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0753:ASIOCC]2.0.CO;2

Kon M, Sakai S and Ochi T. (2000). A new species of the genus Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from Sarawak, Borneo. Entomological Science 3(2): 367–371.

Korasaki V, Lopes J, Gardner Brown G and Louzada J. (2013). Using dung beetles to evaluate the effects of urbanization on Atlantic Forest biodiversity. Insect Science 20(3): 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01509.x

Magurran A. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0

Malmivaara M, Löfström I and Vanha-Majamaa I. (2002). Anthropogenic effects on understorey vegetation in Myrtillus type urban forest in Southern Finland. Silva Fennica 36(1): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.568

Marsh C J, Louzada J, Beiroz W and Ewers R M. (2013). Optimising bait for pitfall trapping of Amazonian dung beetles (Coleoptera Scarabaeinae). PLoS one 8(8): e73147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073147

Mat Salleh K. (1999). The role and function of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Permanent Forest Reserve in Research and Education. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 22(2): 185–198.

Moreno C E and Rodr?guez P. (2011). Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Back to basics and toward a unifying framework. Oecologia 167(4): 889–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2125-7

Muhaimin A M, Hazmi I R and Yaakop S. (2015). Colonization of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of smaller body in the Bangi Forest Reserve, Selangor, Malaysia: A model sampling site for a secondary forest area. Pertanika Journal of Tropical and Agricultural Sciences 38(4): 519–532.

Nichols E, Gardner T A, Peres C A and Spector S. (2009). Co-declining mammals and dung beetles, an impending ecological cascade. Oikos 118(4): 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17268.x

Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila M E and Vulinec K. (2008). Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation 141(6): 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011

Noraini M. (1990). Profil hutan Bangi. In: A. Latif (ed.), Ekologi dan biologi Hutan Simpan Bangi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 125–138.

Ochi T and Kon M. (1996). Studies on the coprophagus scarab beetles from East Asia (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae) IV. Giornale Italiano Di Entomologia 8: 17–28.

Ochi T, Kon M and Kikuta T. (1996). Studies on the family Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) from Borneo. I. Identification keys to subfamilies, tribes and genera. Giornale Italia Entomologia 8: 37–54.

Ostfeld R S and LoGiudice K. (2003). Community disassembly, biodiversity loss, and the erosion of an ecosystem service. Ecology 84(6): 1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3125

Jabatan Perlindungan Hidupan Liar dan Taman Negara (PERHILITAN). (2015). Konservasi ex-situ. http://www.wildlife.gov.my/index.php/ms/2013-02-08-11-40-37/fungsibahagian/konservasi-ex-situ.html (accessed on 30 November 2015)].

Qie L, Lee T M, Sodhi N S and Lim S L. (2011). Dung beetle assemblages on tropical landbridge islands: Small island effect and vulnarable species. Journal of Biogeography 38(4): 792–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02439.x

Rands M R, Adams W M, Bennun L, Butchart S H, Clements A, Coomes D, Entwistle A, Hodge I, Kapos V, Scharlemann J P W, Sutherland W J and Vira B. (2010). Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997): 1298– 1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189138

Ricotta C. (2007). A semantic taxonomy for diversity measures. Acta Biotheoretica 55(1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-007-9008-7

Shahabuddin. (2010). Diversity and community structure of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) across a habitat disturbance gradient in Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi. Biodiversitas 11(1): 29–33. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d110107

Shahabuddin, Hidayat P, Manuwoto S, Noerdjito W A, Tscharntke T and Schulze C H. (2010). Diversity and body size of dung beetles attracted to different dung types along a tropical land-use gradient in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26(1): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409990423

Shahabuddin, Schulze C H and Tscharntke T. (2005). Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biodiversity and Conservation 14(4): 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0654-7

Tuomisto H. (2011). Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Yes, if we choose to use it. Oecologia 167(4): 903–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2128-4

Yaakop S and Aman A Z. (2013). Does the fragmented and logged-over forest show a real hyperdynamism on Braconid species? Malaysian Applied Biology Journal 42(2): 65–69.

Yamada T, Niino M, Yoshida S, Hosaka T and Okuda T. (2014). Impacts of logging road networks on dung beetles and small mammals in a Malaysian production forest implications for biodiversity safeguards. Land 3(3): 639–657. https://doi.org/10.3390/land3030639