Biological Water Quality Indices Performance Based on Aquatic Insects in Recreational Rivers

Main Article Content

Ahmad Hadri Jumaat
Suhaila Abdul Hamid

Abstract

Abundance and distribution of aquatic insects respecting to several water chemical parameters from six rivers were studied in order to determine the performance of biological index in monitoring the water quality. A total of 960 individuals of aquatic insects from nine orders were recorded using kick and drag sampling techniques. Lubok Semilang had the greatest number of aquatic insect with 250 individuals, followed by Telaga Tujuh (181 individuals) and Sungai Durian Perangin (171 individuals). EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) order were the most dominant order recorded in all six rivers. Lata Kekabu had more diverse and richer aquatic insect assemblages based on ecological indices compared to the other five rivers. In order to evaluate the water quality of recreational rivers in Malaysia, Family Biotic Index (FBI), Malaysian Family Biotic Index (MFBI) and Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) were used and compared with Water Quality Index to determine the water quality at the study areas. Results demonstrated that the biotic indices were more sensitive towards changes in water parameters than the WQI. Among all the biological indices, Malaysian Family Biotic Index (MFBI) was the most suitable index to be adopted in Malaysian river water assessment as it is more reliable in assessing the status of water quality.

Article Details

How to Cite
Biological Water Quality Indices Performance Based on Aquatic Insects in Recreational Rivers. (2021). Tropical Life Sciences Research, 32(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2021.32.1.6
Section
Original Article

References

Allan J D. (2004). Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122

Al-Shami S A, Che Salmah M R, Abu Hassan A and Madrus M R. (2013). Biodiersity of stream insects in the Malaysian Peninsular: Spatial pattern and environmental constraints. Ecological Entomology 38: 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12013

Al-Shami S A, Che Salmah M R, Abu Hassan A and Nor S A M. (2011). Distribution of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) in polluted rivers of the Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Sciences 22(5): 1718–1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60311-9

Aweng E R, Ismid M S and Maketab M. (2011). The effect of land uses on physicochemical water quality at three rivers in Sungai Endau watershed, Kluang, Johor, Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5(7): 923–932.

Batty M. (2005). Agents, cells and cities: New representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37: 1373–1394. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3784

Che Salmah M R, Al-Shami S A, Madziatul Rosemahanie M and Abu Hassan A. (2012). Local effects of forest fragmentation on diversity of aquatic insects in tropical forests rivers: Implications for biological conservation. Aquatic Ecology 47: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9426-8

Engel S R and Voshell J R Jr. (2002). Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist 48(3): 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/48.3.164

Hepp L U, Restello R M and Milesi S V. (2013). Distribution of aquatic insects in urban headwater streams. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 25(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X2013005000014

Hilsenhoff W L. (1988). A modification of the biotic index of organic stream pollution to remedy problems and permit its use throughout the year. Great Lakes Entomologist 31(1): 1–12.

Hoang H. (2009). Monitoring and assessment of macroinvertebrate communities in support of river management in northern Vietnam. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ghent University, Belgium.

Kopciuch R G, Berecka B, Bartoszewicz J and Buszewski B. (2004). Some considerations about bioindicators in environmental monitoring. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 13(5): 453–462.

Lavoie I and Campeau S. (2010). Fishing for diatoms: Fish gut analysis reveals water quality changes over a 75-year period. Journal Paleolimnology 43: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-009-9321-z

Leunda P, Miranda R, Oscoz J and Arino A H. (2009). Longitudinal and seasonal variation of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and biotic indices in an undistributed Pyrenean river. Ecological Indicator 9: 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.009

Mandaville S M. (2002). Benthic macroinvertebrates in freshwater—taxa tolerance values, metrics, and protocols, Project H-1. Soil & Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax, Canada, 128 p.

Merritt R W, Cummins K W and Berg M B. (2008). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Morse J C. (2004). Insecta: Tricoptera. In: Yule C M and Yong H S. (Eds.). Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian Region. Malaysia: Academy of Sciences Malaysia, 501–539.

Mustow S E. (2009). Biological monitoring of rivers in Thailand: Use and adaptation of the BMWP score. Hydrobiologia 479: 191–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021055926316

Oliveira S V and Cortes R M V. (2006). Environmental indicators of ecological integrity and their development for running waters in northern Portugal. Limnetica 25(1): 479–498

Rife G S and Moody D L. (2004). Aquatic macroinvertebrate communities from the Protage River watershed headwater streams (Wood Country, Ohio). The Ohio Journal of Sciences 104: 29.

Semenchenko V P and Moroz M D. (2005). Comparative analysis of biotic indices in the monitoring working system of running water in biospheric reserve. Water Resources 32: 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11268-005-0025-0

Suhaila A H and Che Salmah M R. (2011). Influence of substrate-embeddedness and canopy cover on the abundance and diversity of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) in recreational rivers. Aquatic Insects 33: 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2011.640940

_______. (2017). Application of aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) in water quality assessment of Malaysian headwater. Tropical Life Sciences Research 28(2): 143–162. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2017.28.2.11

Suhaila A H, Che Salmah M R and Nurul Huda A. (2014). Seasonal abundance and diversity of aquatic insects in rivers in Gunung Jerai Forest Reserve, Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana 43(5): 667–674.

Wan Mohd Hafezul W A G. (2016). Development of Malaysian water quality indices using aquatic macroinvertebrates population of Pahang River Basin, Pahang, Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Webb J M and McCafferty W P. (2008) Heptageniidae of the world, Part II: Key of the genera. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 7: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2008.07

Xu M, Wang Z, Duan X and Pan B. (2014). Effects of pollution on macroinvertebrates and water quality bio-assessment. Hydrobiologia 729: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1504-y

Yule C M and Yong H S. (2004). Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian region. Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Sciences Malaysia, 443–456.

Zarei H and Bilondi M P. (2013). Factor analysis of chemical composition in the Karoon River basin, southwest of Iran. Applied Water Science 3: 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0123-0