Nest Characteristics of the Sumatran Orang-utan (Pongo abelii) in the Wildlife Sanctuary Soraya Station in Aceh Province, Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Orangutans (Pongo spp.) populations used to be widely distributed throughout Southeast Asia, from Java in the south to the southern China in the north during the Pleistocene. Their populations have declined up to 75% of their original size and are now distributed only in parts of the tropical rainforests of Borneo and Sumatra. Pongo pygmaeus, Pongo tapanuliensis and Pongo abelii, are the three most representative species, and this study discussed the latter. Sumatran forests are generally suffering from deforestation with rates ranging from 3.74% to 49.85% between 2000 and 2012. Thus, human wildlife conflict intensity has escalated and gained more traction. Orangutans are known as arboreal great apes and need to build nests for resting. Here we applied the transect line method (three transects; each 1,000 m long) at different elevations in Soraya Station, Gelombang Village, Sultan Daulat sub-district, Subulussalam district, and assessed nest characteristics. The characteristics are: (1) nesting position referring to the position of nest on a tree; (2) nest successional stages defining the age and leaf decay used in constructing a nest indicated with I (new) until V (almost gone); and (3) nest density to predict the density of nest per square km. Afterwards, the identified nesting trees along the transect were further identified based on their species, and assessed based on three characteristics (the nesting tree height, diameter and the height of a nest measured from the soil). A total of 27 nests were found, and 44% were located in transect III or at the riparian. Out of 27, four orangutans’ nests were found on Moraceae (Streblus elongatus) and Myrtaceae (Syzigium spp.), while three nests were found on Dipterocarpus sp. Tree height, tree diameter and nest height were 10 m–25 m (mean = 17.5 m; SD = ± 0.25), 10 cm–30 cm (mean = 20 cm; SD = ± 0.4) and 16 m–20 m (mean = 18 m; SD = ± 0.35), respectively. Meanwhile, nest density calculated based on the form: d = [N/ (L* 2w)], and the values obtained were 8.4, 13.45, 26.9 nests/km2 located on transect I, II and III or at the riparian. The most commonly found nest successional stages and position were stage III and position 3, respectively. This study could serve as baseline research representing that in primate conservation, nest characterisation could be used as guidance for any future activity planning (e.g., tree reforestation) in a particular region and the existence of various tree species diversity are indispensable for maintaining orangutan habitats’ quality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ancrenaz M, Calaque R and Lackaman-Ancrenaz I. (2004). Orangutan nesting behavior in distubed forest of Sabah, Malaysia: Implications for nest census. International Journal of Primatology 25(5): 983–1000. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000043347.84757.9a
Ancrenaz D M, Oram F and Lackman I. (2017). Orangutan (Pongo). In The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Vol. II, US: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0243
Arcus Foundation. (2018). State of the apes: Infrastructure development and ape conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108436427
Atmoko S S U and Rifqi M A. (2012). Buku panduan survei sarang Orangutan. Forum Orangutan Indonesia (Forina) dan Fakultas Biologi, Universitas Nasional. Bogor in Forum Orangutan Indonesia.
Chapman C A, Bicca-Marques J C and Dunham A E. (2020). Primates can be a rallying symbol to promote tropical forest restoration. Folia Primatologica 91: 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505951
Fauzi F, Penyang and Hidayat N. (2017). Identifikasi jenis pohon sarang dan pakan Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) di arboretum Nyaru Menteng, Palangkaraya. Jurnal Hutan Tropika XII(2): 51–60.
Iqbar. (2015). Keanekaragaman tumbuhan berhabitus pohon di stasiun Soraya ekosistem Leuser. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biotik, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, 214–220.
Khotiem M, Lovadi I and Tjiu A. (2014). Studi awal karakteristik pohon sarang dan sarang orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeues: Linnaeus 1760). Jurnal Protobiont 3(2): 193–200.
KOMPAS. (2019). Pembalakan liar yang nyata di Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser (TNGL) seluas 870 hektar [Evidence forest encroachment in the periphery of Gunung Leuser National Park amounting up to 870 hectares]. KOMPAS, February 2019.
Nasution A, Perwitasari-Farajallah D and Utami-Atmoko S S. (2018). Nesting characteristics of the Tapanuli orangutan (Pongo tapanuliensis) in two unprotected forests of Batang Toru, North Sumatra. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 197(2018): 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/197/1/012027
Prayogo H, Thohari A M, Sholihin D D, Prasetyo L B and Sugardjito. (2014). Karakter kunci pembeda antara Orangutan Kalimantan (Pongo pygmaeus) dengan Orangutan Sumatera (Pongo abelii). Bionatura 16(1): 52–58.
Rangkuti R, Patana P and Latifah S. (2015). Pola aktivitas Orangutan Sumatera (Pongo abelii) pada struktur dan komposisi vegetasi hutan di Pusat Pengamatan Orangutan Sumatera Timur Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser. Medan: Faculty of Agriculture, University of North Sumatra.
Reinhardt K D. (2020). Wild primate sleep: Understanding sleep in an ecological context. Current Opinion on Physiology 15: 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2020.04.002
Rifai M, Patana P and Yunasfi. (2013). Analysis of the trees and nest characteristics of Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) in Bukit Lawang district. Peronema Forestry Science Jurnal 2(2): 130–136.
Riyadi G M, Said S and Erianto. (2015). Karakteristik dan kerapatan sarang orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii, Tiedemann 1808) di areal IUPHHK-HA PT. Karda Traders Kabupaten Lamandau provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Hutan Lestari 3(3): 469–480.
Robertson J M Y and van Schaik C P. (2001). Causal factors underlying the dramatic decline of the Sumatran orangutan. Oryx 35(1): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00149.x
Roth T S, Rianti P, Frederiksson G M, Wich S A and Nowak M G. (2020). Grouping behaviour of Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) living in forest with low fruit abundance. American Journal of Primatology 82(5): e23123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23123
Sidiq M, Nurdjali B and Idham B (2015). Studi tentang karakteristik dan kerapatan sarang Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) di hutan desa blok pematang gadung kabupaten Ketapang provinsi Kalimantan Barat, masters thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak. Singh M and Yan S. (2021). Spatial-temporal variations in deforestation hotspots in Sumatra and Kalimantan from 2001–2018. Ecology and Evolution 11: 7302–7314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7562
Supriatna J, Dwiyahreni A A, Winarni N, Mariati S and Margules C. (2017). Deforestation of primate habitat on Sumatera and adjacent islands, Indonesia. Primate Conservation 31: 71–82.
Utama B S. (2019). Asymmetric decentralization in Aceh: Institutionalization of conflict of interest by elites of GAM. Jurnal Politik 5(1): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i1.219
van Schaik C P, Monk K A and Robertson J M Y. (2001). Dramatic decline in orangutan numbers in the Leuser Ecosystem. Oryx 35(1): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00150.x
Wich S A, Meijaard E, Marshall A J, Husson S, Ancrenaz M, Lacy R C, van Schaik C P, Sugardjito J, Simorangkir T, Traylor-Holzer K, et al. (2008). Review: Distribution and conservation status of the orangutan (Pongo spp.) on Borneo and Sumatra: How many remain. Oryx 42(3): 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060530800197X
Wich S A, Singleton I, Nowak M G, Atmoko S S U, Nisam G, Mhd. Arif S, Putra R H, Ardi R, Frederiksson G, Usher G, et al. (2016). Land-cover changes predict steep declines for the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). Science Advances 2(3): e1500789. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500789