Drought-Induced Changes in The Flowering Capacity, Anthesis Quality and Seed Set in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Main Article Content

Mohd Syahmi Salleh
Mohd Shukor Nordin
Adam Puteh
Rozilawati Shahari
Zarina Zainuddin
Mohamad Bahagia Ab-Ghaffar
Noraziyah Abd Aziz Shamsudin

Abstract

Drought stress significantly reduces grain yield (GY) due to poor spikelet fertility and anthesis quality. Aim of this study was to understand the changes of flowering capacity, anthesis quality traits and seed set in the re-watered drought stressed modern high yielding drought susceptible rice cultivar, IR64 at heading (DSH) and booting (DSB) stages. The well-watered plants served as control of the experiment. Results obtained suggest that spikelet moisture content at above 80% was required to maintain optimum anthesis process in rice. Anthesis process in DSH plant was suspended when leaf relative water content (LRWC) dropped to below than 70%. Effects of drought stress on the spikelet moisture were irreversible as compared to the leaf rolling and LRWC. Hence, seed set was failed to occur at the upper rachis branches of the DSH plant. Anthesis process in the re-watered drought stress plants was resumed on the third day after re-watering with about 50% and 80% of anthers managed to dehisce in the DSH and DSB plants. Consequently, percentage of spikelet fertility and seed set in the DSH and DSB plants were increased towards the lower parts of the panicle. The GY, number of seeds, spikelet fertility, and harvest index however were significantly lower in the DSH plant (0.30 g, 13, 16.40% and 14.81) as compared to DSB plant (1.34 g, 57, 59.14% and 48.30), respectively. In addition, all interrelated traits involved in the flowering process of rice could be collectively termed as the anthesis quality traits due to their significant correlation with the grain yield and other yield components.

Article Details

How to Cite
Drought-Induced Changes in The Flowering Capacity, Anthesis Quality and Seed Set in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). (2022). Tropical Life Sciences Research, 33(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2022.33.2.11
Section
Original Article

References

Ekanayake I J, Datta S K D E and Steponkus P L. (1989). Spikelet sterility and flowering response of rice to water stress at anthesis. Annals of Botany 63(2): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087740

_______. (1993). Effect of water deficit stress on diffusive resistance, transpiration, and spikelet desiccation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 72(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1082

Fukai S and Cooper M. (1995). Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice. Field Crops Research 40(2): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00096-U

Grondin A, Dixit S, Torres R, Venkateshwarlu C, Rogers E, Mitchell-olds T, Benfey P N, Kumar A and Henry A. (2018). Physiological mechanisms contributing to the QTL qDTY3.2 effects on improved performance of rice Moroberekan x Swarna BC2 F3:4 lines under drought. Rice 11(43): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0234-1

Gupta A, Rico-Medina A and Caño-Delgado A I. (2020). The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science, 368: 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614

Henry A, Swamy B P M, Dixit S, Torres R D, Batoto T C, Manalili M, Anantha M S, Mandal N P and Kumar A. (2015). Physiological mechanisms contributing to the QTLcombination effects on improved performance of IR64 rice NILs under drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(7): 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru506

Hsiao T C. (1973). Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24(1): 519–570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511

Ikmal M A, Nurasyikin Z, Arvind K and Noraziyah A A S. (2018). Evaluation of morphophysiological traits of MRQ74 pyramided lines with drought yield QTLs. Euphytica 214: 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2178-3

Ikmal M A, Nurasyikin Z, Tuan Nur Aqlili Riana T A, Puteri Dinie Ellina Z, Wickneswari R and Noraziyah A A S. (2019). Drought yield QTL (qDTY) with consistent effects on morphological and agronomical traits of two populations of new rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines. Plants 2019(8): 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8060186

Jagadish S V K, Raveendran M, Rang Z W, Malo R, Heuer S, Bennett J and Craufurd P Q. (2011). Spikelet proteomic response to combined water deficit and heat stress in rice (Oryza sativa cv. N22). Rice 4(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-011-9059-x

Jongdee B, Fukai S and Cooper M. (2002). Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice. Field Crops Research 76(2-3): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00036-9

Liu J X and Bennett J. (2011). Reversible and irreversible drought-induced changes in the anther proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes IR64 and Moroberekan. Molecular Plant 4(1): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq039

Liu J X, Liao D Q, Oane R, Estenor L, Yang X E, Li Z C and Bennett J. (2006). Genetic variation in the sensitivity of anther dehiscence to drought stress in rice. Field Crops Research 97: 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.019

Mackill D J and Khush G S. (2018). IR64: A high-quality and high-yielding mega variety. Rice 11: 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0208-3

Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI). (2008). Sustainable rice planting guide. Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia: MARDI.

Matsui T and Kagata H. (2003). Characteristics of floral organs related to reliable selfpollination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 91: 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg045

Matsui T, Kobayasi K, Kagata H and Horie T. (2005). Correlation between viability of pollination and length of basal dehiscence of the theca in rice under a hot-andhumid condition. Plant Production Science 8(2): 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.109

Mdluli S Y, Shimelis H and Mashilo J. (2020). Screening for pre- and post-anthesis drought responses in selected bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science 70(4): 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1725105

Mishra S S, Behera P K and Panda D. (2019). Genotypic variability for drought tolerancerelated morpho-physiological traits among indigenous rice landraces of Jeypore tract of Odisha, India. Journal of Crop Improvement 33(2): 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1579138

Prasad P V, Boote K J, Allen J L H, Sheehy J E and Thomas J M G. (2006). Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. Field Crops Research 95: 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.04.008

Salleh M S, Nordin M S, Puteh A, Shahari R, Zainuddin Z, Ghaffar M B A and Noraziyah A A S. (2021). Response of primed rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds towards reproductive stage drought stress. Sains Malaysiana 50(10): 2913–2921. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5010-06

Salleh M S, Nordin M S and Puteh A B. (2020). Germination performance and biochemical changes under drought stress of primed rice seeds. Seed Science and Technology 48(3): 333–343. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2020.48.3.02

Salleh M S, Nordin M S, Ghaffar M B A, Shahari R, Zainuddin Z and Puteh A. (2018). Effects of pre-anthesis drought stress on yield components and seed quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Malaysian Applied Biology 47(5): 149–155.

Sanders P M, Lee P Y, Biesgen C, Boone J D, Beals T P, Weiler E W and Goldberg R B. (2000). The Arabidopsis DELAYED DEHISCENCE1 gene encodes an enzyme in the jasmonic acid synthesis pathway. Plant Cell 12: 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.7.1041

Saragih A A, Puteh A B, Ismail M R and Mondal M M A. (2013). Pollen quality traits of cultivated (Oryza sativa L . ssp . indica) and weedy (Oryza sativa var. nivara) rice to water stress at reproductive stage. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7(8): 1106–1112.

Schonfeld M A, Johnson R C, Carver B F and Mornhinweg D W. (1988). Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicator. Crop Science 28: 526–531. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x

Shamsudin N A A, Swamy B P M, Ratnam W, Cruz M T S, Sandhu N, Raman A K and Kumar, A. (2016a). Pyramiding of drought yield QTLs into a high quality Malaysian rice cultivar MRQ74 improves yield under reproductive stage drought. Rice 9: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0093-6.

Shamsudin N A A, Swamy B P M, Wickneswari R, Sta. Cruz M T, Anitha R and Kumar A. (2016b). Marker assisted pyramiding of drought yield QTLs into popular Malaysian rice cultivar, MR219. BMC Genetics 2016: 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0334-0

Swamy B P M, Shamsudin N A A, Rahman S N A, Mauleon R, Ratnam W, Sta. Cruz M T and Kumar A. (2017). Association mapping of yield and yield-related traits under reproductive stage drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 10(1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0161-6

Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M, Hara N, Kitomi Y, Inukai Y, Ono K, Kanno N, et al. (2013). Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nature Genetics 45(9): 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2725

Upadhyaya H and Panda S K. (2019). Drought stress responses and its management in rice. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M, Nahar K, Biswas J K (eds.). Advances in rice research for abiotic stress tolerance. UK: Elsevier, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814332-2.00009-5

Venuprasad R, Impa S M, Gowda R P V, Atlin G N and Serraj R. (2011). Rice near-isogeniclines (NILs) contrasting for grain yield under lowland drought stress. Field Crops Research 123(1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.04.009

Vikram P, Swamy B P M, Dixit S, Trinidad J, Cruz M T S, Maturan P C, Amante M and Kumar A. (2016). Linkages and interactions analysis of major effect drought grain yield QTLs in rice. PLoS ONE 11(3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151532

Win A, Tanaka T S T and Matsui T. (2020). Panicle inclination influences pollination stability of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Production Science 23(1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2019.1698971

Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, Li P and Cao C. (2019). The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Scientific Reports 9: 3742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40161-0

Zhu R, Wu F Y, Zhou S, Hu T, Huang J and Gao Y. (2020). Cumulative effects of drought-flood abrupt alternation on the photosynthetic characteristics of rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany 169: 103901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103901