Investigating Drivers Impacting Carbon Stock and Carbon Offset in a Large-Scale Rubber Plantation in the Middle South of Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
A large-scale rubber plantation in Southern Thailand is expected to capture a significant amount of carbon dioxide from emissions through carbon sinks in the vegetation and soil. The goal of this research is to create a carbon offset assessment for rubber plantations lasting for 30 years using a voluntary market contract approach. To evaluate the area of large-scale rubber plantations, this study evaluated major growing regions in five provinces in the middle-south region of Thailand (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Phatthalung, Songkhla, Satun and Trang) using an integrated RS-GIS technique that incorporated biomass allometric equations, soil series databases, and object-based classification. The classification of rubber plantation areas and the mapping of rubber stand ages were conducted to estimate the above-ground biomass of the rubber tree. Texture analysis was used in the rubber classification process, and NDVI was combined with texture analysis to separate vegetation areas from other land cover. Four groups of varying ages (1–6, 7–13, 14–20 and 21–30 years old) were evaluated for their capacity to generate carbon offsets. The equations of voluntary market contract revenue according to the contract method of the CCX were applied for this case study. This evaluation was used to estimate their annual value, total and net incomes in the carbon market price regarding the RGGI Allowance (RGA). Carbon offset income was then used to estimate the potential income (over a 30-year period) of the life of the contract. The results showed that the carbon stock potential of rubber plantations depended on the age of the trees and the soil carbon stock. The total carbon stock in the rubber plantations varied from 249.73 to 301.48 Mg C/ha (or equivalently 916.49 to 1,106.44 Mg CO2e/ha). Furthermore, the potential net income of the contract was estimated to be between USD5,378.32 and USD5,930.38 Mg CO2e/ha over a 30-year period according to the voluntary market contract revenue. These results suggest that the large agricultural land plot policy could create opportunities for carbon offsetting. The policy of large-scale rubber areas could be used as a tool and mechanism for farmers who are considering participating in carbon-crediting mechanisms. Then, farmers could use voluntary market contracts as a guide and foundation for their decision-making. The carbon offset credit strategy could assist Thailand in achieving its climate goals of transitioning to a low-carbon agriculture sector.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Kaisi M M, Yin X H and Licht M A. (2005). Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105(4): 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.08.002
Anderson J A, Long A and Luckert M K. (2015). A financial analysis of establishing poplar plantations for carbon offsets using Alberta and British Columbia’s afforestation protocols. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45(2): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0097
Association of Natural Rubber Producing Countries (ANRPC). (2021). Natural rubber statistics. Association of Natural Rubber Producing Countries. http://www.anrpc.org/
Avtar R, Suzuki R and Sawada H. (2014). Natural forest biomass estimation based on plantation information using PALSAR data. PLoS ONE 9: e86121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086121
Bing X, Di G Z, Long P S and Yun F J. (2010). Biomass carbon stocks in China’s forests between 2000 and 2050: A prediction based on forest biomass-age relationships. Science China Life Sciences 53: 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-010-4030-4
Bose A, Cohen J, Fattouh B, Johnson O and Spilker G. (2021). Voluntary markets for carbon offsets: Evolution and lessons for the LNG market. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Charoenjit K, Zuddas P, Allemand P, Pattanakiat S and Pachana K. (2015). Estimation of biomass and carbon stock in Para rubber plantations using object-based classification from Thaichote satellite data in Eastern Thailand. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 9: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096072
Chen B, Li X, Xiao X, Zhao B, Dong J, Kou W, Qin Y, Yang C, Wu Z, Sun R, Lan G and Xie G. (2016). Mapping tropical forests and deciduous rubber plantations in Hainan Island, China by integrating PALSAR 25-m and muti-temporal Landsat images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 50: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.03.011
Chen G, Thill J C, Anantsuksomsri S, Tontisirin N and Tao R. (2018). Stand age estimation of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations using an integrated pixel- and objectbased tree growth model and annual Landsat time series. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 144: 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.07.003
Chiarawipa R, Pechkeo S, Keawdoung M and Prommee W. (2012). Assessment of carbon stock and the potential income of the carbon offset in rubber plantation. Burapha Science Journal 17(2): 91–102.
Corpuz O S, Abas E L and Salibio F C. (2014). Potential carbon storage of rubber plantations. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 2: 73–82. https://doi.org/10.30750/ijpbr.2.2.13
Current D, Scheer K, Harting J, Zamora D and Ulland L. (2010). A landowner’s guide to carbon sequestration credits: In association with the Commonwealth Project. Minnesota: Regional Sustainable Development Partnership.
Farlee L D and Stelzer H E. (2008). Cash for carbon: A Woodland owner’s guide for accessing carbon markets. Purdue: Purdue Extension, FNR-228-W, Purdue University.
Goetz S and Dubayah R. (2011). Advances in remote sensing technology and implications for measuring and monitoring forest carbon stocks and change. Carbon Management 2(3): 231–244. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.18
Hein L, Duclaux O, Fragu L, Lewis J, Roberts P, Synhaeve N, White L and Zamora A. (2017). Using forest carbon credits to offset emissions in the downstream business. Report no. 9/17. Brussels: Concawe.
Hytönen J, Kaakkurivaara N, Kaakkurivaara T and Nurmi J. (2018). Biomass equations for rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) components in southern Thailand. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 30(4): 588–596. https://doi.org/10.26525/jtfs2018.30.4.588596
Holland B L, Monk N A M, Clayton R H and Osborne C P. (2019). A theoretical analysis of how plant growth is limited by carbon allocation strategies and respiration. In Silico Plants 1(1): diz004. https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diz004
Ignosh J, Stephenson K, Yancey M, Whittle B, Alley M and Wysor W G. (2009). Virginia landowner’s guide to the carbon market. Virginia: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Publication no. 442–138.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In R K Pachauri and A Reisinger (eds.). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
IPCC. (2019). Summary for policymakers. In P R Shukla, J Skea, E Calvo Buendia, V Masson-Delmotte, H O Pörtner, D C Roberts, P Zhai, et al. (eds.). Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC AR5.
Jeyanny V, Balasundram S K and Husni M H. (2011). Geo-spatial technologies for carbon sequestration monitoring and management. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 7(5): 456–462. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2011.456.462
Kafy A A, Saha M, Fattah Md A, Rahman M T, Duti B M, Rahaman Z A, Bakshi A, Kalaivani S, Rahaman S N and Sattar G S. (2023). Integrating forest cover change and carbon storage dynamics: Leveraging Google Earth Engine and InVEST model to inform conservation in hilly regions. Ecological Indicators 152: 110374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110374
Kungpisdan N. (2006). Academic report: Rubber fertilizer. Bangkok: Rubber Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand.
Koedsin W and Huete A. (2015). Mapping rubber tree stand age using Pleiades satellite imagery: A case study in Thalang district, Phuket, Thailand. Engineering Journal 19: 45–56. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2015.19.4.45
Li Z and Fox J M. (2012). Mapping rubber tree growth in mainland Southeast Asia using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI and statistical data. Applied Geography 32: 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.018
Liu C G, Pang J P, Jepsen M R, Lu X T and Tang J W. (2017). Carbon socks across a fifty year chronosequence of rubber plantations in tropical China. Forests 8: 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8060209
Lu D, Chen Q, Wang G, Liu L, Li G and Moran E. (2016). A survey of remote sensing-based above ground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth 9(1): 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2014.990526
McPherson E G. (1998). Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento’s urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 24(4): 215–223. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1998.026
Maggiotto S R, de Oliveira D, Marur C J, Stivari S M S, Leclerc M and Wagner-Riddle C. (2014). Potential carbon sequestration in rubber tree plantations in the northwestern region of the Paraná State, Brazil. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 36(2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v36i2.17404
Nath A J, Brahma B and Das A K. (2019). Rubber plantations and carbon management. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429023491
N’Dri J K, Guéi A M, Edoukou E F, Yéo J G, N’Guessan K K, Lagerlöf J. (2018). Can litter production and litter decomposition improve soil properties in the rubber plantations of different ages in Côte d’Ivoire? Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 111: 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9923-9
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2020). Agricultural Production Information: Rubber. https://www.oae.go.th
Panklang P, Thaler P, Thoumazeau A, Chiarawipa R, Sdoodee S and Brauman A. (2022). How 75 years of rubber monocropping affects soil fauna and nematodes as the bioindicators for soil biodiversity quality index. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil & Plant Science 72(1): 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2022.2034930
Petsri S, Chidthaisong A, Pumijumnong N and Wachrinrat C. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon stock changes in rubber tree plantations in Thailand from 1990 to 2004. Journal of Cleaner Production 52: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.003
Pibumrung P, Gajaseni N and Popan A. (2008). Profiles of carbon stocks in forest, reforestation and agricultural land, northern Thailand. Journal of Forest Research 19(1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0002-y
Piñeiro G, Paruelo J M and Oesterheld M. (2006). Potential long-term impacts of livestock introduction on carbon and nitrogen cycling in grasslands of Southern South America. Global Change Biology 12: 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01173.x
Redondo-Brenes A and Montagnini R. (2006). Growth, productivity, aboveground biomass, and carbon sequestration of pure and mixed native tree plantations in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 232: 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067
RGGI. (2023). Allowance prices and volumes. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. (RGGI, Inc.). https://www.rggi.org/Auctions/Auction-Results/Prices-Volumes
Poolen D and Ryszka K. (2021). Can voluntary carbon markets change the game for climate change? RaboResearch-Economic Research. https://economics.rabobank.com/
Puttaso P. (2015). Impact of age of rubber tree plantation on soil properties and soil carbon sequestration. Masters diss., Khon Kaen University.
Saengruksawong C, Khamyong S, Anongrak N and Pinthong J. (2012). Growths and carbon stocks of para rubber plantation on Phonpisai soil series in Northeastern Thailand. Rubber Thai Journal 1: 1–18.
Sayavong S, Kaewjampa N, Katawatin R, Iwai C B, Moukomla S, Oszwald J and Pierret A. (2019). Mapping rubber stand ages in Luangnamtha district (Northern Laos) using NDVI and LSWI from Landsat images. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 24(2): APST-24. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2019.18
Somboonsuke B, Pacheerat K and Wettayaprasit P. (2009). A socio-economic simulation of rubber smallholding systems: A case study of Phatthalung and Songkhla provinces in southern Thailand. CMU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3(3): 113–134.
Stephenson K, Bosch D and Groover G. (2004). Carbon credit potential from intensive rotational grazing under carbon credit certification protocols. Paper presented at The American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, 1–4 August 2004, 18 pp.
Suwanwerakamtorn R, Putklang W, Khamdaeng P and Wannaros P. (2012). An application of THEOS data to rubber plantation areas in Mukdahan province, Northeast Thailand. Proceeding of the 33rd Asia Pacific Advanced Network, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 13–17 February 2012.
Tarnoczi T J. (2017). An assessment of carbon offset risk: A methodology to determine an offset risk adjustment factor and considerations for offset procurement. Carbon Management 8(2): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1295734
Thakur J K, Singh S K and Ekanthalu V S. (2017). Integrating remote sensing, geographic information systems and global positioning system techniques with hydrological modeling. Applied Water Science 7: 1595–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0384-5
The EU Emissions Trading System. (2017). EU ETS handbook. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en
The Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO). (2022). Guideline for Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Program (T-VER) (Version 03). Bangkok: Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization).
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2022). The Paris Agreement 2015. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-parisagreement
Wang A, Kafy A A, Rahaman Z A, Rahman M T, Faisal A A, Afroz F. (2022). Investigating drivers impacting vegetation carbon sequestration capacity on the terrestrial environment in 127 Chinese cities. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 16: 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100213
Watkins K B, Hignight J A and Anders M M. (2009). Assessing the impacts of soil carbon credits and risk on no-till rice profitability. Paper presented at The Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 31 January–3 February, 25 pp.
Wauters J B, Coudert S, Grallien E, Jonard M and Ponette Q. (2008). Carbon stock in rubber tree plantations in Western Ghana and Mato Grosso (Brazil). Forest Ecology and Management 255(7): 2347–2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.038
World Bank. (2020). State and trends of carbon pricing 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/
Yang J C, Huang J H, Tang J W, Pan Q M and Han X G. (2005). Carbon sequestration in rubber tree plantations established on former arable lands in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 29(2): 296–303. https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0038
Yasen K and Koedsin W. (2015). Estimating aboveground biomass of rubber tree using remote sensing in Phuket province, Thailand. Journal of Medical and Bioengineering 4: 451–456. https://doi.org/10.12720/jomb.4.6.451-456
Yongsatisak T, Khampeera A, Thongnoo K, Bennui A and Yongchalermchai P P. (2011). Application of THEOS satellite images in age-classified estimation of rubber wood stock: A case study of Utapao basin, Songkhla province. Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS Association of Thailand 12: 28–42.
Zhang H and Zhang G L. (2003). Microbial biomass carbon and total organic carbon of soils as affected by rubber cultivation. Pedosphere 13: 353–357.
Zhang M, Fu X H, Feng W T and Zou X M. (2007). Soil organic carbon in pure rubber and tea-rubber plantations in South-western China. Tropical Ecology 48(2): 201–207.
Zheng H, Ouyang Z Y, Xu W H, Wang X K, Miao H, Li X Q and Tian Y X. (2008). Variation of carbon storage by different reforestation types in the hilly red soil region of southern China. Forest Ecology and Management 255(3–4): 1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.015