An Experiential Online Learning Module on Genetics and Genomics for Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teaching genetics and genomics to multidisciplinary undergraduate students presents challenges due to their varied academic backgrounds, particularly among non-science majors. To address this, YOUnique: From Genes to Gen (Genomics) was developed as an interactive online module introducing fundamental concepts through experiential learning. This module was delivered during the Live Inclusive Fulfilling Experience (LIFE) Programme, a two-week online summer programme offered by Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). The YOUnique Genomics module aims to build scientific understanding, encourage ethical reflection on emerging genomic technologies, such as gene editing and precision medicine, and foster empathy towards individuals with genetic conditions. It integrates multimedia content, facilitator-led sessions, group discussions and hands-on activities exploring heredity, gene–environment interactions, epigenetics, and ageing. Student feedback indicated strong satisfaction with the module. Most participants strongly agreed that the module was useful, well organised and level appropriate, with activities described as enjoyable (96.1%) and facilitators praised for being knowledgeable, and engaging. Learners found the module relevant to their lives (98.1%) and appreciated the interdisciplinary exposure. Despite some participation barriers, such as Internet issues and personal commitments, students reported enhanced understanding of genetics, and genomics. Word cloud analysis further indicated an understanding of core genetic concepts alongside awareness of real-world applications and ethical issues. The YOUnique Genomics module demonstrates a dynamic, inclusive approach to genetics education across disciplines.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
National Human Genome Research Institute [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Human Genome Research Institute; 2018 Sep 7 [cited 2025 Aug 19]. Genetics vs. genomics fact sheet. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genetics-vs-Genomics
Williams GA, Roubal T, Panteli D, Edwards N [Internet]. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2021 Jan 28 [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Regulating the unknown: a guide to regulating genomics for health policy makers (policy brief no. 38). Available from: https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/regulating-the-unknown-a-guide-to-regulatinggenomics-for-health-policy-makers
Niemi MEK, Daly MJ, Ganna A. The human genetic epidemiology of COVID-19. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(9):533–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00478-5
Wu KCH, He Q, Bennett AN, Li J, Chan KHK. Shared genetic mechanism between type 2 diabetes and COVID-19 using pathway-based association analysis. Front Genet. 2022;22(1)3:1063519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1063519
Hansson MG, Bouder F, Howard HC. Genetics and risk – an exploration of conceptual approaches to genetic risk. J Risk Res. 2018;21(2):101–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1382562
Stern F, Kampourakis K. Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Stud Sci Educ. 2017;53(2):193–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731
Boerwinkel DJ, Waarlo AJ, Boersma K, Karstens W, Jochemsen H, Knippels M, et al. Reaching a consensus on the definition of genetic literacy that is required of a twenty-first-century citizen. Sci Educ. 2017;26(10):1087–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9934-y
Chen LS, Goodson P. Barriers to adopting genomics into public health education: a mixed methods study. Genet Med. 2009;11(2):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818fa2c7
Boedeker P, Steffen J, Jenssen L, Hofmann A, Meyer J, Klein S, et al: active versus passive learning in large-group sessions in medical school: a randomised crossover trial investigating effects on learning and the feeling of learning. Med Sci Educ. 2025;35(1):459–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02299-7
Rogers CR. Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill; 1969.
Peters RS. Freedom to learn: a view of what education might become. Interchange. 1970;1(4):111–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214887
Butler MG, Hebl MR, Phillips KW, Apfelbaum EP, Biernat M, Toosi NR, et al. Do, reflect, think, apply: experiential education in accounting. J Account Educ. 2019;48:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.05.001
Kolb A, Kolb D. Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learn Teach Higher Educ. 2022;1:38. https://doi.org/10.46787/elthe.v1i1.3362
Lemay DJ, Bazinet L, Nori D, Morsink P, Stewart L, Dubois E, et al. Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2021;4:100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130
García-Peñalvo FJ, Corell A, Abella-García V, Grande-de-Prado M. Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Burgos D, Tlili A, Tabacco A, editors. Radical solutions for education in a crisis context: COVID-19 as an opportunity for global learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2021. p. 85–98. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6
Smiderle R, Rigo SJ, Marques LB, Peçanha de Miranda Coelho JA, Jaques PA. The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learn Environ. 2020;7(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
Li C, Lalani F [Internet]. Geneva: World Economic Forum. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever: this is how. c2020 [cited 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
Singh J, Zolfaghari A, Sahin I, Clark S, Gilbert S, Hassan M, et al. Online, hybrid, and face-to face learning through the eyes of faculty, students, administrators, and instructional designers: lessons learned and directions for the post-vaccine and post-pandemic/COVID-19 world. J Educ Technol Syst. 2022;50(3):301–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211063754
Hott AM, Huether CA, McInerney JD, Christianson C, Fowler R, Bender H, et al. Genetics content in introductory biology courses for non-science majors: theory and practice. BioScience. 2002;52(11):1024–35. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1024:GCIIBC]2.0.CO;2
Schmid RF, Borokhovski E, Bernard RM, Pickup DI, Abrami PC. A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers. Comput Educ Open. 2023;5:100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142
Korf BR. Genetics and genomics education: the next generation. Genet Med. 2011;13(3):201–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820986cd
Donovan BM, Semmens R, Keck P, Brimhall E, Busch K, Weindling M, et al. Genomics literacy matters: supporting the development of genomics literacy through genetics education could reduce the prevalence of genetic essentialism. J Res Sci Teach. 2021;58(4):520–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21670
Athanasiadis G, Nielsen FC, Hansen NR, Als TD, Jorgensen TH, Børglum AD, et al. Spitting for science: Danish high school students commit to a large-scale self-reported genetic study. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161822
Dressler LG, Terry SF, Merz JF, Fraser G, Juengst ET, Livolsi V, et al. Genomics education for the public: perspectives of genomic researchers and ELSI advisors. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014;18(3):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2013.0366
Machová M, Ehler E. Secondary school students’ misconceptions in genetics: origins and solutions. J Biol Educ. 2023;57(3):633–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136
Duncan RG, Reiser BJ. Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students’ understandings of molecular genetics. J Res Sci Teach. 2007;44(7):938–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20186
Cutiongco-de la Paz EMC, Abadingo ME, Maceda EBG, Padilla CD. Genetics and genomics education and training in developing countries. In: Kumar D, editor. Genomic medicine skills and competencies. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022. p. 17–30.
Delanty N, O’Reilly M, Sweeney K, Doherty C, Brown G, O’Brien M, et al. Development of a genomics module within an epilepsy-specific electronic health record: toward genomic medicine in epilepsy care. Epilepsia. 2019;60(8):1670–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16278
McCorkell G, Shur N, Seitz A, Wattendorff A, Alam T, Rajcan-Separovic E, et al. A national education program for rapid genomics in pediatric acute care: building workforce confidence, competence, and capability. Genet Med. 2024;26(10):101224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101224
Gasperskaja E, Kučinskas V. The most common technologies and tools for functional genome analysis. Acta Med Litu. 2017;24(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v24i1.3457
Evans BJ, Burke W, Jarvik GP, Korngiebel DM, McClellan M, Regier DA, et al. How can law and policy advance quality in genomic analysis and interpretation for clinical care? J Law Med Ethics. 2020;48(1):44–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520916995
Ma Y, Wang C, Xu Y, Zhang X, Liu Y, Li Q, et al. What is the power of a genomic multidisciplinary team approach? A systematic review of implementation and sustainability. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024;32(4):381–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01555-5
Duncan RG, Donovan BM, Metzger KJ, Lammey RG, Gonzalez J, Ratcliff M, et al. The sociopolitical in human genetics education. Science. 2024;383(6685):826–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi8227
Aramudin A, Susanti R. Empathy and tolerance cultivation in primary students through local context-based social science lessons. Lentera Pendidik. 2024;27(1):191–206. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2024v27n1i12