Feasibility of Mixed Traditional Interview with Multiple Mini-Interviews for Internal Medicine Residency Admission
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and reliability of the mixed traditional interview with multiple mini-interviews (TI-MMI) for resident selection in an internal medicine residency training programme. Data were collected from 34 applicants and 26 interviewers who participated in admission interviews for the training year 2024 of the Internal Medicine Residency Programme at Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. After the four-station mixed TI-MMI, applicants and interviewers were requested to complete an anonymous survey. Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the reliability. Our study showed that most applicants and interviewers considered the mixed TI-MMI a fair and more effective tool to evaluate applicant competencies and preferred the mixed TI-MMI to standard interviews. The interview station reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from 0.50 to 0.953. Mixed TI-MMI scores demonstrated a significant positive correlation with grade point average (r = 0.44) and National Licence Examination (NLE) scores (r = 0.57). In conclusion, the mixed model of TI-MMI stations for resident admissions is generally feasible, acceptable, and reasonably reliable. However, validated studies should continue to identify the predictive validity of the mixed TI-MMI for selecting residents with the best fit for the programme.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Glazer G, Startsman LF, Bankston K, Michaels J, Danek JC, Fair M. How many schools adopt interviews during the student admission process across the health professions in the United States of America? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:12. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.12
Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ. 2004;38(3):314–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01776.x
Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Rainwater JA, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, et al. Reliability of multiple mini-interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1030-0
Fraga JD, Oluwasanjo A, Wasser T, Donato A, Alweis R. Reliability and acceptability of a five-station multiple mini-interview model for residency program recruitment. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2013;3(3–4):21362. https://doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v3i3-4.21362
Rees EL, Hawarden AW, Dent G, Hays R, Bates J, Hassell AB. Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 37. Med Teach. 2016;38(5):443–55. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799
Yusoff MSB. Multiple mini-interviews as an admission tool in higher education: insights from a systematic review. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019;14(3):203–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.03.006
Langer T, Ruiz C, Tsai P, Adams U, Powierza C, Vijay A, et al. Transition to multiple mini interview (MMI) interviewing for medical school admissions. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9(4):229–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00605-0
Abrams M, Olvet DM, Ellenbogen L, Bird JB, Fazio C, Caprioglio L, et al. Comparison of the multiple mini-interview and the traditional interview in medical school admissions: lessons learned using a hybrid model at one institution. Acad Med. 2023;98(5):606–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005127
Dore KL, Kreuger S, Ladhani M, Rolfson D, Kurtz D, Kulasegaram K, et al. The reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S60–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ed442b
Suksathien R, Charussuriyong P, Ingkasuthi K, Vongvachvasin P. The multiple mini-interview for physical and rehabilitation medicine residency admissions: reliability and acceptability. ASEAN J Rehabil Med. 2023;33(2):93–100.
Campagna‐Vaillancourt M, Manoukian J, Razack S, Nguyen LHP. Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(1):91–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24122
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen YS, Fall AA, Khoo C, Nadarajah VD. The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training – a systematic review. Med Teach. 2013;35(12):1027–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.829912
Husbands A, Dowell J. Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini‐interview. Med Educ. 2013;47(7):717–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12193
Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood TJ, Norman GR. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA. 2012;308(21):2233–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.36914
Wildermuth A. Predictive ability of multiple mini-interviews in admissions on programmatic academic achievement: a systematic review. J Allied Health. 2022;51(2):154–9.
Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, Peterson EM, et al. Do admissions multiple mini-interview and traditional interview scores predict subsequent academic performance? A study of five California medical schools. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):388–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002440
Knorr M, Hissbach J. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ. 2014;48(12):1157–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12535
Yamada T, Sato J, Yoshimura H, Okubo T, Hiraoka E, Shiga T, et al. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z