Why Physics Matters: A Student View on Building Better Healthcare Professionals in Croatia
Main Article Content
Abstract
A comprehensive understanding of fundamental physical laws is essential for effectively using modern medical devices and comprehending the biological processes of organisms. This underscores the necessity of physics as a mandatory course in medical and healthcare studies. However, there is a lack of research regarding medical students’ motivation to learn physics and their awareness of its importance in healthcare, particularly among students in radiology and physiotherapy programmes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess students’ motivations for enrolling in healthcare programmes, their opinions about physics, and their perceived value of physics education for future career competencies. The sample comprised 157 undergraduate students from the physiotherapy and radiologic technology programmes at the Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Croatia. Data were collected using a standardised questionnaire and analysed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test. The research findings indicate that most students are enthusiastic about learning physics when they see its practical applications, especially in therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Additionally, students are primarily motivated by a desire to help others, positive high school experiences, career aspirations, and family influence. Final-year students particularly recognise the significance of physics in diagnostics and therapies. Furthermore, professors’ professionalism and the curriculum’s relevance to future job skills are key
motivators. These findings can be used to develop diverse teaching strategies to enhance student interest, ultimately cultivating experts who can advance healthcare and improve disease diagnosis and treatment.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adams WK, Perkins KK, Podolefsky NS, Dubson M, Finkelstein ND, Wieman CE. New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: the Colorado learning attitudes about science survey. Phys Rev - Phys Educ Res. 2006;2(1):010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010101
Alsufyani D. Students’ awareness of physics application in the medical field. Phys Educ. 2023;59(1):015005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acfebc
Stowers T, Lyndon MP, Henning MA, Hill AG, Webber M. Exploring factors that motivate and influence medical students to attend medical school. TAPS. 2019;4(3):3–12. https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2019-4-3/OA2097
Brophy J. Motivating students to learn. 3rd edition. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge; 2010.
Cervera VC. La excelencia en las profesiones sanitarias. Humanit Humanid Méd. 2007;(21):1–21.
Jelovica L, Alajbeg A. An overview of the characteristics of a modern school. Croat J Educ. 2022;25(3):1001–31. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v25i3.4902
Gao H, Wang X. Enhancing teaching competence of physics pre-service teachers in applied undergraduate institutions: reflections and exploration from a PCK perspective. Creat Educ. 2025;16(6):832–43. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2025.166051
Knight R. Five easy lessons: strategies for successful physics teaching. San Francisco, USA: Pearson; 2002.
Bao L, Koenig K. Physics education research for 21st-century learning. Discip Interdiscip Sci Educ Res. 2019;1(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Marušić M, Sliško J. Effects of two different types of physics learning on the results of LASS test. Phys Rev - Phys Educ Res. 2012;8(1):010107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107
Horvat Z. Motivacija u suvremenoj nastavi matematike. Poučak Časopis Za Metod Nastavu Mat. 2018;19(73):21–8.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [Internet]. Paris, France: OECD [cited 2025 July 8]. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/pisa.html
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) [Internet]. Chestnut Hill (MA): TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College [cited 2025 July 10]. Available from: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss-landing.html
Roungos G, Kalloniatis C, Matsinos Y. STEM education in Europe and the PISA test. Sci Educ J. 2020;8(3):177–87.
Faubert V. School evaluation: current practices in OECD countries and a literature review. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2009. p. 2–59.
Erceg N, Alajbeg A. Pre-service teachers’ preparedness for in-service science teaching in primary education – a case study in Croatia. Sci Educ Int. 2024;35(3):207–18 https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i3.4
Gupta AK, Chowdhury V, Khandelwal N. Diagnostic radiology: recent advances and applied physics in imaging. New Delhi, India: JP Medical Ltd; 2013.
Aithor [Internet]. Aithor; 2024 [cited 2025 July 8]. The importance of studying physics in understanding the natural world. Available from: https://aithor.com/essay-examples/theimportance-of-studying-physics-in-understanding-the-natural-world
Fagerstrom J. Medical physics topics as an anchor for physics learning. Int J Innov Sci Math Educ. 2023;31(4): 40–8. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.31.04.004
Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH. Diagnostic radiology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014.
Bushong SC. Radiologic science for technologists. 12th ed. Houston, USA: Mosby; 2021.
Cahill MJ, Hynes KM, Trousil R, Brooks LA, McDaniel MA, Repice M, et al. Multiyear, multi instructor evaluation of a large-class interactive-engagement curriculum. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res. 2014;10(2):020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020101
Brewe E, Kramer L, O’Brien G. Modeling instruction: positive attitudinal shifts in introductory physics measured with CLASS. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 2009;5(1):013102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.013102
Sprawls P. Evolving models for medical physics education and training: a global perspective. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008;4(1):e16. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.1.e16
Jelovica L. Fizika na Preddiplomskom stručnom studiju Radiološke tehnologije. World Health. 2023;6(1):65–71.
Kralova E, Svetlikova-Martauzova L. Motivation of medical students to study sciences. New Trends Issues Proc Humanit Soc Sci. 2017 Nov 1;4(8):103–8.
Fakultet zdravstvenih studija Sveučilišta u Rijeci [Internet]. Rijeka, Croatia: Sveučilište u Rijeci [cited 2025 July 8]. Radiološka tehnologija. Available from: https://fzsri.uniri.hr/studiji/prijediplomski-strucni-studiji/radioloska-tehnologija/
Fakultet zdravstvenih studija Sveučilišta u Rijeci [Internet]. Rijeka, Croatia: Sveučilište u Rijeci [cited 2025 July 8]. Fizioterapija. Available from: https://fzsri.uniri.hr/studiji/prijediplomskistrucni-studiji/fizioterapija/
Lekić A, Mance D. Miskoncepcije i stavovi o fizici kod studenata fizioterapije. Med Flum. 2023;59(1):48–56. https://hrcak.srce.hr/292449
Crnković I, Perković D, Babić J, Dobrić D. Poznavanje fizikalnih zakonitosti u kreiranju fizioterapijskog procesa. J Appl Health Sci. 2017;3(2):273–84. https://hrcak.srce.hr/191062
Zrnčić I. Stavovi studenata prijediplomskih stručnih studija Fizioterapija i Radiološka tehnologija o učenju fizike [bachelor thesis]. Sveučilište u Rijeci, Fakultet zdravstvenih studija, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 13]. Available from: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:166939
Hernandez-Sanchez M, Macias-Gonzalez S, Iturbe-Sanchez E, BarragÁN-Cruz A, Hernandez Carrasco LH. Physics applications: their impact on students’ motivation and perspective of STEM. ASDEE 2022 Annual Conference Excellence Through Diversity. Minnesota, US: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); 2022.
Samsun, Sarifah I, Margono G. The development of a non-cognitive instrument to measure learning motivation in physics among students of the radiology engineering program. JUPE J Pendidik Mandala. 2024;9(4):1253–9. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i4.7943
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London, UK: Routledge; 2017.
Rashid M, Joy A, Raja K, Mathew J. Exploring physiotherapy students’ experiential learning with physical modalities and their relationship to knowledge, attitudes, and practices: a mixed-methods investigation. Health Prof Educ. 2024;10(4):388–94. https://doi.org/10.55890/2452-3011.1308
Johnson RB, Christensen LB. Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. USA: SAGE Publications; 2013.
Fuente-Vidal A, March-Amengual JM, de Souza DLB, Busquets-Alibés E, Sole S, Cañete S, et al. Factors influencing student choice of a degree in physiotherapy: a population-based study in Catalonia (Spain). PeerJ. 2021;9:e10991. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10991
Saeedi M, Ghafouri R, Tehrani FJ, Abedini Z. The effects of teaching methods on academic motivation in nursing students: a systematic review. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:271. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1070_20
Arrigoni C, Micheletti P, Grugnetti AM, Ferrari P, Borrelli P, Montomoli C, et al. The students’ reasons to choose a nursing degree program: an Italian exploratory study. Ann Ig. 2014;26(6):570–7. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2014.2016
Witter S, Wurie H, Namakula J, Mashange W, Chirwa Y, Alonso-Garbayo A. Why do people become health workers? Analysis from life histories in 4 post-conflict and post-crisis countries. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33(2):449–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2485
Rand DG, Brescoll VL, Everett JAC, Capraro V, Barcelo H. Social heuristics and social roles: intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016;145(4):389–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154
Gotlib J, Białoszewski D, Opavsky J, Garrod R, Fuertes NE, Gallardo LP, et al. Attitudes of European physiotherapy students towards their chosen career in the context of different educational systems and legal regulations pertaining to the practice of physiotherapy: implications for university curricula. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(1):76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.02.003
Saavedra B, Segarra P. Interest in physics courses for biological and health science students in high school. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1929(1):012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012025
Vrdoljak I, Šipraga T. Implementation of physiotherapeutic methods utilizing forces and pressures. Croat Reg Dev J. 2024;5(2):37–51.https://doi.org/10.2478/crdj-2024-0007
den Hertog R, Boshuizen HPA. Learning professional knowledge: Bachelor Nursing students’ experiences in learning and knowledge quality outcomes in a competence-based curriculum. Vocat Learn. 2022;15:21–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09274-4
Hellberg R, Fauskanger E. Learning of quality improvement theory – experiences with reflective learning from a student perspective. Int J Lean Six Sigma. 2022;14(6):1207–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2022-0090
Latif E, Miles S. Students’ perception of effective teaching. J Econ Econ Educ Res. 2013;14:121–30.
Su KD, Yeh SC. Effective assessments of integrated animations to explore college students’ physics learning performances. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;176:588–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.514
Zeynali S, Pishghadam R, Fatemi AH. Identifying the motivational and demotivational factors influencing students’ academic achievements in language education. Learn Motiv. 2019;68(2):101598.
Rastegarimehr B, Mahboubi M, Raoofi S, Beigi S, Teymourlouy AA. Identifying the factors influencing the quality of education from the perspective of nursing students: a qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. 2024;13:422. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1235_23
Fischer HE, Horstendahl M. Motivation and learning physics. Res Sci Educ. 1997;27(3):411–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461762
Hattie J. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge; 2009.
Stoll L. Mijenjajmo naše škole. Zagreb, Croatia: Educa; 2000.
Sogunro OA. Motivating factors for adult learners in higher education. Int J High Educ. 2014;4:22–37. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p22
Brahmia SW, Olsho A, Smith TI, Boudreaux A, Eaton P, Zimmerman C. Physics inventory of quantitative literacy: a tool for assessing mathematical reasoning in introductory physics. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 2021;17:020129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020129
Abril OLC, Arevalo DFV. Interaction in the classroom based on typologies of experiments and mathematization in physics teaching. Rev Mex Física E. 2024;21(2):020208. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.21.020208
Dörnyei Z. Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Krapp A, Prenzel M. Research on interest in science: Theories, methods and findings. Int J Sci Educ. 2011;33:27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
Uran S. A review of high school physics education in the United States of America. Sci J Educ. 2015;3(6):126–30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20150306.12
Jakopovic Z. Kurikulum i nastava fizike. Zagreb, Croatia: Školska knjiga; 2015.
European Commission [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission [cited 2025 July 8]. Digital Education Action Plan. Available from: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focustopics/digital-education/action-plan
Peciuliauskiene P. Instructional clarity in physics lessons: students’ motivation and self-confidence. Cogent Educ. 2023;10(2):2236463. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236463
Alles M, Seidel T, Gröschner A. Toward better goal clarity in instruction: How focus on content, social exchange and active learning supports teachers in improving dialogic teaching practices. Int Educ Stud. 2017;11(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p11
Liu T, Sun H. Building a system for cultivating excellence in physics teacher training based on university-school collaboration. Int J Eng Appl Sci Technol. 2022;7(5):233–6.
Erceg N, Jelovica L, Mešić V, Nešić L, Beljan IP, Nikolaus P. Causes of the shortage of physics teachers in Croatia. Educ Sci. 2023;13(8):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080788