Does One Size Fit All? Examining Learning Styles and Gamification in Radiographic Pathology Education

Main Article Content

Nur Rusydina Rohimi
Shahrani Janudin
Zanariah Mohd

Abstract

Traditional teaching methods, such as textbooks and lectures, often lack interactivity and engagement, which can hinder comprehension and knowledge retention. Gamification, an innovative educational approach, integrates game elements to enhance motivation and learning effectiveness. However, its impact on radiographic pathology education remains underexplored. This study evaluates medical imaging students’ perceptions of gamified learning and its effectiveness across different learning styles, based on the visual, aural, read/write, and kinaesthetic (VARK) model. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 130 students from a medical imaging programme. Respiratory disease quizzes were set up using Kahoot!. To allow participants to experience learning gamification. Data were collected using a validated VARK questionnaire (version 8.0) to determine learning styles, and perceptions were assessed using a validated questionnaire adapted from the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. No significant gender differences were found in perceptions of gamification aspects; both males and females held similar views. However, significant differences were observed by learning style such as aural learners perceived gamification aspects most positively, followed by visual and read/write learners. Kinaesthetic learners rated each aspect lowest, suggesting a need for more hands-on elements. The study indicated a need to personalise learning gamification according to individual learning styles, following the VARK model, while gender factors may be disregarded. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Rohimi, Nur Rusydina, Shahrani Janudin, and Zanariah Mohd. 2026. “Does One Size Fit All? Examining Learning Styles and Gamification in Radiographic Pathology Education”. Education in Medicine Journal 18 (2): 103-12. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2026.18.2.8.
Section
Original Article

References

Center for Devices and Radiological Health [Internet]. Medical imaging. 2018 August 28 [cited 2024 July 2]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/radiationemitting-products/radiation-emitting-products-and-procedures/medical-imaging

Kamal D. Ways to improve active learning in medical education: approaches at both institutional and individual levels. J Health Prof Educ Innov. 2024;1(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/JHPEI.2023.249122.1003

Zainuddin Z, Chu SKW, Shujahat M, Perera CJ. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Educ Res Rev. 2020;30:100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

Dichev C, Dicheva D. Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2017;14:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5

Wang YF, Hsu YF, Fang KT, Kuo LT. Gamification in medical education: identifying and prioritizing key elements through Delphi method. Med Educ Online. 2024;29(1):2302231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2302231

Hattie J, O’Leary T. Learning styles, preferences, or strategies? An explanation for the resurgence of styles across many meta-analyses. Educ Psychol Rev. 2025;37:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w

Oliveira W, Hamari J, Shi L, Toda AM, Rodrigues L, Palomino PT, et al. Tailored gamification in education: a literature review and future agenda. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28:373–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4

Mora A, Tondello GF, Nacke LE, Arnedo-Moreno J. Effect of personalized gameful design on student engagement. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2018. p. 1925–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363471

Codish D, Ravid G. Gender moderation in gamification: does one size fit all? Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2017. p. 2006–13.

Fleming ND, Mills C. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improv Acad. 1992;11:137–55.

Klock ACT, Gasparini I, Pimenta MS, Hamari J. Tailored gamification: a review of literature. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2020;144:102495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495

El-Saftawy E, Abdel Latif AA, ShamsEldeen AM, Alghamdi MA, Mahfoz AM, Aboulhoda BE. Influence of applying VARK learning styles on enhancing teaching skills: application of learning theories. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1034. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05979-x

Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422

Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–5. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Seal DB, Bag S. Effects of gamified learning on academic achievements: does gender matter? In: Omrane A, Patra G, Datta S, editors. Digital technologies for smart business, economics and education. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 225–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24101-7_13

Fuchs K. Bringing Kahoot! into the classroom: the perceived usefulness and perceived engagement of gamified learning in higher education. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2022;12(7):625–30. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.7.1662

Nylén-Eriksen M, Stojiljkovic M, Lillekroken D, Lindeflaten K, Hessevaagbakke E, Flølo TF, et al. Game-thinking; utilizing serious games and gamification in nursing education – a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06531-7

Yan H, Zhang H, Su S, Lam JFI, Wei X. Exploring the online gamified learning intentions of college students: a technology-learning behavior acceptance model. Appl Sci. 2022;12(24):12966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412966

Pazilah FN, Hashim H, Yunus MM. Benefits of gamification towards different learning styles in language learning. Int J Innov Creat Change. 2019;5(6):1136–48.

Goethe O. Visual aesthetics in games and gamification. In: Gamification mindset. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11078-9_8

Seyal AH, Rahman MNA. Understanding learning styles, attitudes and intentions in using e-learning system: evidence from Brunei. World J Educ. 2015;5(3):61–72. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n3p61

Pascu M. The contribution of students’ learning styles to competences development through the use of Kahoot! learning platform. Cogent Educ. 2024;11(1):2352320. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2352320

Buckley P, Doyle E. Individualising gamification: an investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Comput Educ. 2017;106:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009

Xiong Y, Wu N, Zhang Z, Wu W, Zhang X, Peng G, et al. Blended learning in practice-intensive medical education: a qualitative exploration of undergraduate medical imaging technology students’ experiences. Radiography. 2025;31(5):103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103115

Ganjitsuda K. Effect of practical training on radiography students’ CT exposure knowledge: a study in Japan. Radiography. 2025;31(2):102897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.102897