Implementing Blended Learning in Health Professional Education: A Scoping Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This systematic scoping review analysed the current status of blended learning (BL) in health professions education (HPE). The benefits and feasibility of implementing BL in HPE were documented. Literature screening identified the essentials of implementing BL in HPE. This study implemented the recommended frameworks for conducting scoping reviews. A search strategy was established using keywords associated with the defined participants: health professions education students, blended learning, and entry-level graduate programmes. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Emcare, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Education Research Information Center (ERIC), and ScienceDirect. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence software. Data were extracted from the included records using a predetermined data extraction form by two independent reviewers. The extracted data were evaluated and summarised in tabular and diagrammatic formats. A total of 164 full texts were screened, of which 59 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the report synthesis. Most of the studies were conducted in developed countries. The majority of the included studies were conducted in medical and nursing courses. Most studies used a quasi-experimental or non-randomised experimental design, with only four randomised controlled studies. The included studies used various theoretical frameworks. There were only two mixed-methods studies. Various tools were used to assess the impact of BL. Low levels of student satisfaction, increased learning load, lack of faculty members’ readiness and high costs were the challenges documented. Advantages, challenges, feasibility and methods of implementing BL were identified. Research gaps pertaining to BL in HPE were documented. Implementing BL in HPE may be feasible if designed and implemented according to multimodal theory.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2004;7(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Okaz AA. Integrating blended learning in higher education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;186:600–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086
Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802108331
Dhonncha EN, Murphy M. Learning new ways of teaching and assessment: the impact of COVID-19 on undergraduate dermatology education. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46(1):170–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14364
Konrad S, Fitzgerald A, Deckers C. Nursing fundamentals - supporting clinical competency online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teach Learn Nurs. 2020;16(1):53–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.07.005
Thibaut D, Schroeder KT. A case-based learning approach to online biochemistry labs during COVID-19. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020;48(5):484–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21408
Boysen 2nd PG, Daste L, Northern T. Multigenerational challenges and the future of graduate medical education. Ochsner J. 2016;16(1):101–7.
Hyll M, Schvarcz R, Manninen K. Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1569-z
Roberts DH, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Twelve tips for facilitating Millennials’ learning. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):274–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2011.613498
Eckleberry-Hunt J, Lick D, Hunt R. Is medical education ready for Generation Z? J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(4):378–81. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00466.1
Desy JR, Reed DA, Wolanskyj AP. Milestones and millennials: a perfect pairing—competencybased medical education and the learning preferences of Generation Y. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(2):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.026
Chipps J, Pimmer C, Brysiewicz P, Walters F, Linxen S, Ndebele T, et al. Using mobile phones and social media to facilitate education and support for rural-based midwives in South Africa. Curationis. 2015;38(2):1500. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v38i2.1500
Diug B, Kendal E, Ilic D. Evaluating the use of twitter as a tool to increase engagement in medical education. Educ Health. 2016;29(3):223–30. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.204216
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1181
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1_suppl):6–20. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308576
Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(10):1386–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci. 2010;5(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Nagaraj C, Yadurappa SB, Anantharaman LT, Ravindranath Y, Shankar N. Effectiveness of blended learning in radiological anatomy for first-year undergraduate medical students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43(4):489–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02572-x
Eachempati P, Kiran Kumar KS, Sumanth KN. Blended learning for reinforcing dental pharmacology in the clinical years: a qualitative analysis. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016;48(Suppl 1):S25–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.193315
Berga KA, Vadnais E, Nelson J, Johnston S, Buro K, Hu R, et al. Blended learning versus face-to face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;96:104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622
Patel B, Taggar JS. Virtual teaching of undergraduate primary care small groups during COVID-19. Educ Prim Care. 2021;32(5):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2021.1920475
Nathaniel TI, Goodwin RL, Fowler L, McPhail B, Black Jr AC. An adaptive blended learning model for the implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):699–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2097
Teichgräber U, Ingwersen M, Mentzel H-J, Aschenbach R, Neumann R, Franiel T, et al. Impact of a heutagogical, multimedia-based teaching concept to promote self-determined, cooperative student learning in clinical radiology. Rofo. 2021;193(6):701–11.
Grundgeiger T, Ertle F, Diethei D, Mengelkamp C, Held V. Improving procedural skills acquisition of students during medical device training: experiments on e-Learning vs. e-learning with handson. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022;28(1):127–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10148-0
Park K-H, Yi Y. Mock trials and web-based education using malpractice cases: a randomised controlled trial. Collegian. 2023;30(2):293–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.09.014
Weimer A, Recker F, Vieth T, Buggenhagen H, Schamberger C, Berthold R, et al. Undergraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound training based on current national guidelines—a prospective controlled study on transferability. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06203-6
Liu Q, Yuan N, Wang Y, Sun B, Yang L, Wang Z, et al. A practice and exploration of blended learning in medical morphology during the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):719. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07280-x
Herrmann-Werner A, Weber H, Loda T, Keifenheim KE, Erschens R, Molbert SC, et al. “But Dr
Google said...” - training medical students how to communicate with e-patients. Med Teach. 2019;41(12):1434–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1555639
Jeganathan S, Fleming PS. Blended learning as an adjunct to tutor-led seminars in undergraduate orthodontics: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2020;228(5):371–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1332-1
Posey L, Pintz C. Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: successes, challenges and outcomes. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;26:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006
Ilic D, Nordin RB, Glasziou P, Tilson JK, Villanueva E. A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0321-6
Bridges S, Chang JWW, Chu CH, Gardner K. Blended learning in situated contexts: 3-year evaluation of an online peer review project. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014;18(3):170–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12082
Xu M-M, Tian Q, Yu S-H, Liu Y-T, Cao M-L, Zhang W. Cognitive engagement of nursing undergraduates in blended learning: a parallel mixed-methods study. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;130:105947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105947
Gellisch M, Morosan-Puopolo G, Brand-Saberi B, Schäfer T. Adapting to new challenges in medical education: a three-step digitisation approach for blended learning. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):585. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05503-1
Jaleel A, Iqbal SP, Cheema KM, Iftikhar S, Bashir MZ. Navigating undergraduate medical education: a comparative evaluation of a fully online versus a hybrid model. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):895. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05865-6
Yang Y, Chen H, Sun H. Nursing undergraduate students’ experiences and perceptions of blended learning in pediatric nursing: a mixed methods study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024;10:23779608241274214. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241274214
Khong ML, Tanner JA. Surface and deep learning: a blended learning approach in preclinical years of medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1029. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05963-5
Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Cannavina G. Evaluating a blended-learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school. J Dent Educ. 2007;71(2):269–78.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Knowles MS, Holton III EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Oxford: Elsevier; 2012.
Duque G, Demontiero O, Whereat S, Gunawardene P, Leung O, Webster P, et al. Evaluation of a blended learning model in geriatric medicine: a successful learning experience for medical students. Australas J Ageing. 2013;32(2):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00620.x
Blissitt AM. Blended learning versus traditional lecture in introductory nursing pathophysiology courses. J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(4):227–30. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160316-09
Custer T, Wampler K, Lambing L, Sayles H, Michael K. Lecture, online, flipped, and blended: a mixed-methods study on ultrasound student outcomes and perceptions. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2022;38(6):487–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793221106781
Fehl M, Gehres V, Geier AK, Mundt T, Klinge K, Frese T, et al. Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship - cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2028334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2028334
Doyle AJ, Murphy CC, Boland F, Pawlikowska T, Gabhann-Dromgoole JN. Education in focus: significant improvements in student learning and satisfaction with ophthalmology teaching delivered using a blended learning approach. PLoS One. 2024;19(7):e0305755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305755
Gong L, Song Y, Xu Y, Wang M, Ma H, Liu W, et al. The use of a technology-assisted and teacher supervised online discussion platform to promote academic progress in blended embryology courses. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):817. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03890-x
Shan Y, Zhou X, Qi W, Liu X, Huang C. Innovations in teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparisons of the impacts of different teaching approaches in psychiatric nursing on undergraduate nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):827. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04819-8
Green RA, Whitburn LY. Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):422–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1602
Sandars J, Patel RS, Goh PS, Kokatailo PK, Lafferty N. The importance of educational theories for facilitating learning when using technology in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1039–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1019438
de Fatima Wardenski R, de Espindola MB, Struchiner M, Giannella TR. Blended learning in biochemistry education: analysis of medical students’ perceptions. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2012;40(4):222–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20618
Sadiq F, Rasa SI, Shami N, Seemadaud S, Bhatti S. Comparing effectiveness of collaborative blended learning and traditional teaching using students’ final test scores. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2018;12(4):1428–31.
Howlett D, Vincent T, Watson G, Owens E, Webb R, Gainsborough N, et al. Blending online techniques with traditional face-to-face teaching methods to deliver final-year undergraduate radiology learning content. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(3):334–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.028
Ilic D, Nordin RB, Glasziou P, Tilson JK, Villanueva E. Development and validation of the ACE tool: assessing medical trainees’ competency in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-114
Shorey S, Kowitlawakul Y, Devi MK, Chen HC, Soong SKA, Ang E. Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:120–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011
Morton CE, Saleh SN, Smith SF, Hemani A, Ameen A, Bennie TD, et al. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
Langenau EE, Lee R, Fults M. Blended learning educational format for third-year pediatrics clinical rotation. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017;117(4):234–43. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2017.041
Shorey S, Siew AL, Ang E. Experiences of nursing undergraduates on a redesigned blended communication module: A descriptive qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:77–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.012
Hsu LL. Qualitative assessment of a blended learning intervention in an undergraduate nursing course. J Nurs Res. 2012;20(4):291–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e31827363bc
Green RA, Whitburn LY, Zacharias A, Byrne G, Hughes DL. The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(5):471–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1761
Gough D. Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Res Pap Educ. 2007;22(2):213–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189