Fostering Excellence in English Academic Writing Among Health Profession Students and Lecturers: An Action Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Academic writing is a critical skill for researchers and educators. However, many, especially in nonnative English-speaking contexts, face challenges in mastering it. This study employed action research (AR) involving 27 participants to address these challenges through the design and implementation of an academic writing workshop for postgraduate students and lecturers from the Faculties
of Medicine, Health Sciences, and Pharmacy. The AR workshop integrated hands-on learning, structured guidance, and innovative tools such as ChatGPT to enhance participants’ academic writing self-efficacy. A validated self-efficacy writing scale and a structured open-ended feedback form were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the AR intervention. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed self-efficacy scores increased significantly from 48.39 (SD = 6.71) to 59.07 (SD = 7.27) after the workshop (p < 0.001; mean difference = 10.68, 95% CI: 8.37 to 12.99). The main effects of gender and role (student versus lecturer) were not significant. Nevertheless, interaction effects revealed that male participants and students improved significantly more than
female participants and lecturers. Using McNiff’s AR framework analysis, the thematic synthesis revealed key barriers to academic writing, such as challenges in initiating and structuring ideas, and highlighted the importance of engaging environments and the integration of artificial intelligent (AI) tools. Institutional support is crucial for addressing logistical and methodological challenges,
including obtaining ethics approval and raising awareness of the AR research paradigm. While the findings illuminate the path for targeted interventions to enhance academic writing, demographic disparities and systemic barriers warrant further investigation. This study offers actionable insights for developing inclusive, adaptable writing programmes for diverse learners in higher education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
McCrory-Churchill S, Clay L. Academic writing in the health professions: a comparison of two writing-intensive course models within a cross-disciplinary course. Imagining SoTL. 2021;1:25–40. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl535
Fogarty M. Centralised supports for writing in higher education and their applicability to research, teaching and learning contexts. J Acad Writ. 2020;10(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.583
Fadiji AW, Eloff I. Student wellbeing and academic support in higher education. Front Educ. 2024;9:1119110. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1119110
Ibaguner S [Internet]. ResearchGate; 2024 [cited 2026 May 19]. Common misconceptions about writing philosophy. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381828860_COMMON_MISCONCEPTIONS_ABOUT_WRITING_PHILOSOPHY.
Kozak M. Academic writing, and how to learn how to write. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(3):373–4. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00154.1
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 7th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2020.
Mohammad N [Internet]. ResearchGate; 2022 [cited 2026 May 19]. Bahana mengejar KPI, kompetensi dan profesionalisme pensyarah terjejas. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362944122_Bahana_mengejar_KPI_kompetensi_dan_profesionalisme_pensyarah_terjejas
Azmar K, Razali AB. Teaching and learning of English academic writing in a public university in Malaysia: a case study. Int J Instr. 2024;17(4):645–68. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17436a
Marković VB. Academic skills: a guide to academic writing. 1st ed. Belgrade: Singidunum University; 2022.
Lekamge R, Rajavarathan J. Enhancing academic writing proficiency among English as a second language users at the undergraduate level: a comparative analysis of student-lecturer perspectives and strategies. Res Educ. 2024;10:37–76. https://doi.org/10.56177/red.10.2024.art.4
Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. Creating logical flow when writing scientific articles. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(40):e275. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e275
Henshall C, Lewin T. Academic writing retreats for nurses and allied health professionals: developing engagement, dissemination and collaboration opportunities. Nurse Res. 2022;30(3):19–27. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1846
Anderson I. Avoiding plagiarism in academic writing. Nurs Stand. 2009;23(18):35–7. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2009.01.23.18.35.c6739
McNiff J. Action research: all you need to know. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. 15. OpenAI. ChatGPT 4.0 [software]. San Francisco: OpenAI; 2025. Available from: https://chatgpt.com/
Lo CK. What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Cotton DRE, Cotton PA, Shipway JR. Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2024;61(2):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
UCL Institute of Education [Internet]. London: University College London; c2017 [cited 2024 Nov 17]. Academic writing centre. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-andcentres/centres/academic-writing-centre
Bruning R, Dempsey M, Kauffman DF, McKim C, Zumbrunn S. Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
Addinsoft. XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution [software]. New York: Addinsoft; 2022.
Sulaiman SH. Students’ ways of understanding academic writing. J Gen Educ Humanit. 2022;1(4):163–74. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i4.32
Street BV. Academic writing: theory and practice. J Educ Issues. 2015;1(2):110–6. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v1i2.8314
Adams J, Ari M, Cleeves M, Gong J. Reflective writing as a window on medical students’
professional identity development in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(2):117–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1687303
Shen M, Feng Z. Continuing nursing education: an action research study on the implementation of a nursing training program using the Holton Learning Transfer System Inventory. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:610. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05552-6
Scott KM, Hughes M, Davids J. Facilitating health professional education research development; an action research approach. Clin Teach. 2021;18(6):614–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13428
Mahama I, Baidoo-Anu D, Eshun P, Ayimbire B, Eggley VE. ChatGPT in academic writing: a threat to human creativity and academic integrity? An exploratory study. Indones J Innov Appl Sci. 2023;3(3):228–39. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i3.1005