Fostering Excellence in English Academic Writing Among Health Profession Students and Lecturers: An Action Research

Main Article Content

Izzudeen Ayub
Megat Mustaqim Megat Iskandar
Siti Yusrina Nadihah Jamaludin
Yasrul Izad Abu Bakar
Mohd Salami Ibrahim

Abstract

Academic writing is a critical skill for researchers and educators. However, many, especially in nonnative English-speaking contexts, face challenges in mastering it. This study employed action research (AR) involving 27 participants to address these challenges through the design and implementation of an academic writing workshop for postgraduate students and lecturers from the Faculties
of Medicine, Health Sciences, and Pharmacy. The AR workshop integrated hands-on learning, structured guidance, and innovative tools such as ChatGPT to enhance participants’ academic writing self-efficacy. A validated self-efficacy writing scale and a structured open-ended feedback form were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the AR intervention. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed self-efficacy scores increased significantly from 48.39 (SD = 6.71) to 59.07 (SD = 7.27) after the workshop (p < 0.001; mean difference = 10.68, 95% CI: 8.37 to 12.99). The main effects of gender and role (student versus lecturer) were not significant. Nevertheless, interaction effects revealed that male participants and students improved significantly more than 
female participants and lecturers. Using McNiff’s AR framework analysis, the thematic synthesis revealed key barriers to academic writing, such as challenges in initiating and structuring ideas, and highlighted the importance of engaging environments and the integration of artificial intelligent (AI) tools. Institutional support is crucial for addressing logistical and methodological challenges,
including obtaining ethics approval and raising awareness of the AR research paradigm. While the findings illuminate the path for targeted interventions to enhance academic writing, demographic disparities and systemic barriers warrant further investigation. This study offers actionable insights for developing inclusive, adaptable writing programmes for diverse learners in higher education. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Izzudeen Ayub, Megat Mustaqim Megat Iskandar, Siti Yusrina Nadihah Jamaludin, Yasrul Izad Abu Bakar, and Mohd Salami Ibrahim. 2026. “Fostering Excellence in English Academic Writing Among Health Profession Students and Lecturers: An Action Research”. Education in Medicine Journal 18 (Supp. 1): 41-56. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2026.18.s1.4.
Section
Short Communication

References

McCrory-Churchill S, Clay L. Academic writing in the health professions: a comparison of two writing-intensive course models within a cross-disciplinary course. Imagining SoTL. 2021;1:25–40. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl535

Fogarty M. Centralised supports for writing in higher education and their applicability to research, teaching and learning contexts. J Acad Writ. 2020;10(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.583

Fadiji AW, Eloff I. Student wellbeing and academic support in higher education. Front Educ. 2024;9:1119110. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1119110

Ibaguner S [Internet]. ResearchGate; 2024 [cited 2026 May 19]. Common misconceptions about writing philosophy. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381828860_COMMON_MISCONCEPTIONS_ABOUT_WRITING_PHILOSOPHY.

Kozak M. Academic writing, and how to learn how to write. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(3):373–4. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00154.1

American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 7th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2020.

Mohammad N [Internet]. ResearchGate; 2022 [cited 2026 May 19]. Bahana mengejar KPI, kompetensi dan profesionalisme pensyarah terjejas. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362944122_Bahana_mengejar_KPI_kompetensi_dan_profesionalisme_pensyarah_terjejas

Azmar K, Razali AB. Teaching and learning of English academic writing in a public university in Malaysia: a case study. Int J Instr. 2024;17(4):645–68. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17436a

Marković VB. Academic skills: a guide to academic writing. 1st ed. Belgrade: Singidunum University; 2022.

Lekamge R, Rajavarathan J. Enhancing academic writing proficiency among English as a second language users at the undergraduate level: a comparative analysis of student-lecturer perspectives and strategies. Res Educ. 2024;10:37–76. https://doi.org/10.56177/red.10.2024.art.4

Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. Creating logical flow when writing scientific articles. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(40):e275. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e275

Henshall C, Lewin T. Academic writing retreats for nurses and allied health professionals: developing engagement, dissemination and collaboration opportunities. Nurse Res. 2022;30(3):19–27. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1846

Anderson I. Avoiding plagiarism in academic writing. Nurs Stand. 2009;23(18):35–7. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2009.01.23.18.35.c6739

McNiff J. Action research: all you need to know. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. 15. OpenAI. ChatGPT 4.0 [software]. San Francisco: OpenAI; 2025. Available from: https://chatgpt.com/

Lo CK. What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Cotton DRE, Cotton PA, Shipway JR. Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2024;61(2):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

UCL Institute of Education [Internet]. London: University College London; c2017 [cited 2024 Nov 17]. Academic writing centre. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-andcentres/centres/academic-writing-centre

Bruning R, Dempsey M, Kauffman DF, McKim C, Zumbrunn S. Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692

Addinsoft. XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution [software]. New York: Addinsoft; 2022.

Sulaiman SH. Students’ ways of understanding academic writing. J Gen Educ Humanit. 2022;1(4):163–74. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i4.32

Street BV. Academic writing: theory and practice. J Educ Issues. 2015;1(2):110–6. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v1i2.8314

Adams J, Ari M, Cleeves M, Gong J. Reflective writing as a window on medical students’

professional identity development in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(2):117–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1687303

Shen M, Feng Z. Continuing nursing education: an action research study on the implementation of a nursing training program using the Holton Learning Transfer System Inventory. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:610. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05552-6

Scott KM, Hughes M, Davids J. Facilitating health professional education research development; an action research approach. Clin Teach. 2021;18(6):614–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13428

Mahama I, Baidoo-Anu D, Eshun P, Ayimbire B, Eggley VE. ChatGPT in academic writing: a threat to human creativity and academic integrity? An exploratory study. Indones J Innov Appl Sci. 2023;3(3):228–39. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i3.1005